Brute force attacks are not feasible remotely, unless the password
is extremely weak.
This is simply not true, although we may disagree on what
feasible means.
I don't know how the major databases handle remote connections, but most
secure systems won't allow more than a handful of
Most database login mechanisms, by themselves, do not
constitute secure
systems. Most common database platforms do not lock accounts
or timeout
access. Most common database platforms also have some known,
common logins.
To the extent that MS SQL Server is configured to allow only Windows
I had used Viux for a couple of years under their shared hosting plan
(up to 20 sites for a flat-rate of $75/mo) when I found a client who
paid me enough in maintenance that I could afford a co-located
solution and got my own box. Not the most robust of servers, it was
still mine alone
Why not have a look at www.forta.com for the reviews of hosts.
We do quite well on here, CFMx Hosting doesn't have a single
bad review :-)
Good idea. Last I tried Ben's app it didn't work on Firefox/Linux. But
today I'm on windows, and it works.
I can't remember, are you with CrystalTech?
Second, the security concerns of you and your ISP may differ
somewhat. Your
ISP is probably more concerned that their servers will be
rooted. You may be
more concerned about the integrity of your data. Granting
remote access to
your database may not be a security issue for your ISP, even
You can also look at Ant, a simple scripting language that Eclipse
people use for these kind of things. Here's a good example of what Ant
can do from Rob Rohan's blog:
http://tinyurl.com/ddtzg
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Why on earth would I do that, when I can just ask here? :P
Seriously though, yeah thanks for the tip. His initial link
to CF ISP's though, returns a broken link. After that, he
has a pretty extensive list of over 600 companies, I don't
know how up to date it is. A couple of the
For instance, they don't allow anything at all custom-tag-wise.
Nothing. You can't even pay extra to have it enabled.
That's the only
thing that I've run into that is a big problem (for me). I
have to use
some kind of custom tag to be able to manage images that are uploaded
on-the-fly,
Like server-side resizing and saving, etc? I've never heard of that.
Maybe I'll go Googling tonight when I get home
Well, I meant client side. But like I said, its just something I think
I heard on a list somewhere. Not sure if its vaporware or not. But if
it is possible in the client,
I'd say it depends on the browser. I know that Firefox 1.5 stores pages
in memory, so when your user clicks back, they aren't hitting your
server (if they use FF 1.5). The browser is just pulling the page from
memory.
From: Roberto Perez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15,
But the HTML page with the redirect, for instance: does that
kind of page always get bypassed when the back broswer is
clicked? Or, is it a matter of how many seconds the redirect
is set to?
Good question. Maybe it depends on if you are doing a cflocation or a
http meta refresh? Have you
Would it be a safe assumption that I could build standard web
apps using
Flex 2 that look and behave in a much more robust way (than
HTML and cross
browser of course due to SWFs) without having to know a tonne
of Flash (but
would have to pick ip AS 3)?
Flex uses MXML. But the
Is it possible to use a CFX tag file without actually registering it
in the CFIDE?
You can put a custom tag in the same directory as the calling page and
it will work without registering it in the administrator.
[INFO] -- Access Manager:
This transmission may contain information that is
After months of reviewing - we have confirmed (with the help
of Microsoft)
that there is a problem with the JRun connector when in use
with IIS.
Of course Microsoft would love the problem to be in JRun because it's
not their software, it's a competitor's. ;)
I wonder if someone should start a separate mailing list or forum for
discussing the development of this shopping cart.
[INFO] -- Access Manager:
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable
Yea, I've been using their interface on the web. It's *Ok*,
but I hate
not being able to manage my databases in a central place.
All of the hosts I've used so far don't allow remote db administration,
except through a web interface. I have only been on a few, but I think
this is standard
I use Xtreme Hosting (Linux), and I have been happy so far. There are a
couple of quirks here and there (I.E., I don't think they have robust
error messages enabled in the CF servers), but you can't beat the price.
And their support has been quick and helpful. I haven't noticed any
service
Some people over on Sean Corfield's blog suggested I add the comments
sections from LiveDocs. These have now been added.
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are
Some people over on Sean Corfield's blog suggested I add the comments
sections from LiveDocs. These have now been added.
I suppose I should have included the link for those that missed the
earlier thread:
http://www.techfeed.net/cfQuickDocs/
[INFO] -- Access
From: Ryan Guill
Great job on this. Its defiantely much snappier than the
actual livedocs.
Thanks!
Just one observation though, and it doesnt really matter, its just
cosmetic, but on my screen at 1900x1200, the header and form are
slightly to the left, while the results come up
I'm assuming since they don't mention OS this is Windows only? Also, CF
6.1? No CF 7?
-Original Message-
From: Stan Winchester [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 2:45 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Great Web Host and Great Service!
Regularly I see posts from
I'm just looking for a
good solution
that works in the majority of cases and does not make it too
difficult for
the user.
ActiveX will cut out a good portion of your market. According to the
latest survey by OneStat IE is down to 85% world wide, and in the
US/Canada it's only got about
might not work in Safari.
-Original Message-
From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 6:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: cfQuickDocs
On 11/7/05, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll look into this tonight and try to escape or replace
From: John C. Bland II
Selecting a combo, FF Beta 1, shows all of the functions for
that selection
(ex - selecting arrays show all array functions, etc). What
would be nice is
searching within the selected combo selection. Currently it
resets the como
every time I type. You prob
don't know about CFAJAX but you can surely use AJAX with
Safari 1.2 I believe.
Thanks
Qasim
On 11/8/05, Sean Corfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/8/05, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last night I took care of the spaces in the category
names. I'm just
replacing them
From: John C. Bland II
Selecting a combo, FF Beta 1, shows all of the functions for
that selection
(ex - selecting arrays show all array functions, etc). What
would be nice is
searching within the selected combo selection. Currently it
resets the como
every time I type. You prob
Good point. I looked up the virus he posted, and it takes advantage of
a hole MS patched with the September or October patch Teusday (I can't
remember which). It's a worm that doesn't require any user intervention
to spread, but I wasn't able to find how it does spread...scanning IPs
for an open
And ActiveX would mean IE only, which may or may not bad, depending on
your target audience. Not to mention that ActiveX is extremely disabled
in the newest versions of IE, for security reasons.
-Original Message-
From: Big Mad Kev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November
I am hosing with Xtreme Hosting, http://www.xtreme-host.com/. I don't
do the reseller stuff, but I have been pleased with their regular
hosting. Their reseller accounts start at $17/mo for Linux and $18/mo
for Windows.
-Original Message-
From: Anne Girardeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You could use cfexecute to run dtsrun from the command line:
cfexecute name = C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL
Server\80\Tools\Binn\dtsrun.exe
arguments = /Sserver /E /Ndts_package
variable = DTSOutput
timeout = 1
/cfexecute
(change the params to match your setup)
-Original
Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 1:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: executing a DTS from coldfusion
You could use cfexecute to run dtsrun from the command line:
cfexecute name = C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL
Server\80\Tools\Binn
You should check out http://www.perlmonks.org/ if you haven't already.
-Original Message-
From: Burns, John D [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 12:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: PERL form email with attachment?
I'm trying to come up with a little comparison
I recently created a CFAjax based view of livedocs, which I thought
people might be interested in. I store the data in a query object that
sits in memory for quick access. It allows you to quickly lookup CF
tags and functions. There is also a simple search interface for the
docs, which also
/05, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently created a CFAjax based view of livedocs, which
I thought
people might be interested in. I store the data in a
query object that
sits in memory for quick access. It allows you to quickly
lookup CF
tags and functions
The category drop-downs don't seem to behave how I would
expect - how are they meant to work?
They should give you all the tags/functions that match the category you
clicked. Is it not doing that for you?
This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
Ah, several of the categories are empty then.
That is strange. I get tags/functions under every category. But I
noticed that all of the categories that return data for you are single
words. I wonder if its an issue with Safari (assuming you're using
that, Sean). I've tested this on Firefox,
I'll look into this tonight and try to escape or replace the spaces in
the category names, I'll bet that fixes it.
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 4:52 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: OT: cfQuickDocs
Ah, several
http://news.com.com/Autonomy+to+buy+competitor+Verity/2100-1011_3-593289
5.html
Verity is being acquired by Autonomy for $500 million.
From the article, Analysts have commented that Cambridge-based Autonomy
is paying a premium for California-based Verity--a 30 percent rise over
Thursday's
Sounds like its time for Linux. jk ;)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: (OT) server rebooting after virus
The House of Fusion box picked up a virus somehow and even
after I've
Maybe for data integrity checks? A record has to be dated in 2005 or
2004, but not both, and not before 2004? Of course then a data range
would work just as well...
That is an odd one, it doesn't seem like it would be used a whole lot.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wouldn't think this would happen. Many federal agencies have a large
commitment to ColdFusion, if it goes open source (with no single
authoritative source for support IE: Adobe) It'll leave
theses agencies with
a product that they'll drop like a bad habit.
That's too big of a single
Thats a big ditto. From the Oracle Express FAQ:
-supports up to 4gb of user data
-single instance only on a server
-only uses and executes on one processor
-can use up to 1GB of RAM
FYI, those are identical restrictions to the MS SQL Server Express
restrictions (but this time MS was
First to announce, but not first to deliver - the final version of SQL
Server 2005 hasn't been released yet.
Oracle XE is beta right now, and SQL Server 2005 is available right now
if you have the right connections, otherwise you can wait 6 days for the
official launch date. Did Oracle say
Give this a go:
cfset myStr = $${POD[1]}
cfdump var=#myStr#br /
cfset myStr = ReReplace(myStr,\$\${(.*?)},!--\1--,all)
cfdump var=#myStr#br /
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 12:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: another regex
If you can move to CFMX 7, and use the event gateways, they've got SMS
support built in. The demos I've seen are pretty sweet. So people
could send an SMS message and get a response from your CF server.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
So I know I need to set a timeout for a cfhttp, but I'm not sure what to
do if a timeout does occur. Here's what I've got now:
cfhttp url=#feedUrl# method=get timeout=3/
cfif cfhttp.errorDetail eq
/cfif
Do I need to have the cfif to make sure I don't have a timeout, or do I
just use
by CFDUMPing the CFCATCH structure.
M!ke
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 11:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: cfhttp timeout
So I know I need to set a timeout for a cfhttp, but I'm not
sure what to
do if a timeout does occur
Another good idea! :)
I just made a page with a cfloop that runs for a long time, and I was
able to test my try/catch around cfhttp.
-Original Message-
From: Dawson, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 11:16 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfhttp timeout
I don't know what DBMS you are using, but should you have quotes around
all of the values in your IN clause, like so:
AND table_1.table_id IN ('value1','value2','value3')
-Original Message-
From: Jillian Koskie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2005 4:12 PM
To:
http://labs.macromedia.com/technologies/flexbuilder2/
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 2:58 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Inline frames a good alternative for creating
web applications?
Flex 2. Don't have a URL,
Claude Schneegans
May be, but this one was not: converting a database to a form usable
under CF is a problem many
of us had to deal with.
Scenario 1:
I have a nasty virus on my PC, and I can't code in CF until its
fixed...will you help me?
Scenario 2:
I couldn't get my car to run this
My pet peeve with the CF-Talk list? Folks who go way off the topic of
the original post but leave the subject heading intact.
Very good point, I'll do that in the future.
As far as using Gmail, I agree that its pretty sweet for the reasons you
stated. I use it at home, but not on this list.
My pet peeve with the CF-Talk list? Folks who go way off
the topic of
the original post but leave the subject heading intact.
Very good point, I'll do that in the future.
Er, what I meant was that I'll change the thread's subject if I change
the subject in the future.
This transmission
Roberto,
Maybe its because you have Application capitalized in your filename?
Maybe if you change it to adapplication.cfm or ad_application.cfm.
-Original Message-
From: Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2005 9:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:
Any Ideas?
Yeah, go ask this question on a mailing list that has MySQL experts, not
a CF mailing list.
[INFO] -- Access Manager:
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the
intended
Andy Matthews
That was rude. If you don't want answer his question, or
don't know the
answer then simply remain silent. Or you could politely
suggest that he try
another forum.
Ok, sorry. I was rude, but I just get frustrated with this mailing
list, which sends me hundreds of messages
Adkins, Randy
Why not change your settings to view the treads on the website.
Or maybe the Daily Digest.
There are other alternatives..
I've tried digest mode before, but the problem remains. I just get a
lot of OT messages all at once, instead of one at a time. Going to the
website is
Raster, Tim
Change your list options to one of the digest versions.
As I said before, the digest versions don't help. I'd still get all of
the OT messages.
I just went over to HoF to check out the situation, and I see that there
are 10 mailing lists to choose from when deciding where to
Thomas Chiverton
On Tuesday 25 October 2005 15:08, Munson, Jacob wrote:
Ok, sorry. I was rude, but I just get frustrated with this mailing
list, which sends me hundreds of messages a day, and a
large portion of
them are
Huge great signature blocks :-)
LOL. Yeah, and those crazy
If you read the file in using cffile, you can loop over the contents
line by line using a cfloop like this:
cfloop list=#DataFile# index=curLine
delimiters=#chr(10)##chr(13)#
!--- do your work using the variable curLine ---
/cfloop
hth
-Original Message-
From: Richard Colman
Don't know if you need more people chiming in, but I am very interested
in AJAX. I have been playing with CFAjax for the last few weeks, and I
LOVE it. It definitely has its quirks (debugging can be a pain in the
___), but the end results are by FAR worth it, IMO. My biggest question
is this:
From: Joe Rinehart
Right - you just have to use a clumsy workaround for testing which
browser people are on, hoping ActiveX is enabled on IE, and that any
new browsing stuff people use supports it, and that they're not on a
mobile (hi, Flash Lite!).
Why the heck should I care of ActiveX is
-Original Message-
From: Dave Carabetta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you ever looked at the standard code developers use to access
the XmlHTTPRequest object?
Nope, and I've never used it myself. So I learned something new today.
:) So far my Ajax apps have been fairly simple
Tim Blair
No, but because the current version of IE doesn't support
XMLHttpRequest
you have to use something like the following:
xmlhttp = new ActiveXObject(Microsoft.XMLHTTP);
Ok, my ignorance stems from this: I use CFAjax. Apparently CFAjax must
have a provision for IE that
I would recommend James Holmes, a member of this list. He's posted some
good stuff to his blog lately. As far as I'm concerned, its darn hard
to convince a developer to make good documentation, so once you find one
you need to take advantage of it! :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Oh no, I totally knew you were joking. I was just making the point
that even avid Firefox users such as myself might choose to use IE for
AJAX-heavy applications until memory leaks and such are fixed on
client sites.
Another issue to keep in mind is that ActiveX is a virus/spyware magnet.
If
Ok, I totally understand why this conversation is OT, and why it should
be banned. But what about the thousands of other OT messages that fly
around here? I'm not perfect about obeying the 'rules' of staying on
topic, but what exactly are the rules? I have seen very little
enforcement of a 'CF
Keep in mind that Microsoft will be making future versions of document
formats XML, but they will NOT be compatible with OpenDocument. Last I
heard they are still fighting against even letting people know what's
going on in their document formats. For them XML is a good way to help
themselves
From: Damien McKenna
Microsoft has promoted their formats as being XML for several
years, the
only problem is that their view of XML means lots of this:
xmlbinarydata/xml
Yeah, which only helps them. It is easier for excel to read a .doc, but
forget about getting inside the .doc yourself.
I'm a member of the effort, and I haven't heard anything about if for a
month or so. They kind of moved their communications to a forum (which
makes sense, considering the project), and I prefer email. So it could
be that I've been removed because of inactivity. :)
-Original Message-
I just got an email from Kevin Benore, the founder. He 'pulled the
plug' on cfopenbb. Its not as dire as it sounds though, he is asking
someone in the existing cfopenbb community to step in as the project
manager and take over the assets, including the developer mailing list
and cfopenbb.com.
]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 12:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfopenbb
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2005 2:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfopenbb
I just got an email from Kevin Benore, the founder. He
Well, if your sensitive data is in a cfsavecontent variable that gets
stored to your DB, I'm not sure I see why that is insecure. The CF
server won't let the user see that, so even if a miscreant manages to
find your security alert page, all they will see is the content you let
them see. But if
From: Mike | NZSolutions Ltd
i sue the following function for displaying the prices correctly...
Are you getting that upset with your code, that you're resorting to
litigation to keep it in line? ;) Sorry, I couldn't resist.
This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
I had a very funny experience with cftry/catch. I was taking
responsibility for a huge and kludgey application that was the result of
2-3 different developers over time. The developer before me had put
try/catches all over the place. They just caught 'any' and emailed him
the error. I wasn't
This guy thinks unit testing is way overrated and a waste of time:
http://wilshipley.com/blog/2005/09/unit-testing-is-teh-suck-urr.html
From the article:
How can I possibly ship a bug-free program and thus make enough money
to feed my tribe if I don't test my shiznit? The answer is, you can't.
better than that!!
Run that loop again LOL
On 10/19/05, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had a very funny experience with cftry/catch. I was taking
responsibility for a huge and kludgey application that was
the result of
2-3 different developers over time. The developer
Do you know if it will take any plugin? Because I like this idea
(Eclipse seems too Java oriented by default for my taste), but I use
Eclipse for more than just CF. I have a few non-CF plugins as well.
-Original Message-
From: John Wilker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
From: Tom Kitta
I hope this is not some kind of invitation to a flame war,
Not at all. In fact, I've been hoping to get into unit testing when I
have some free time. Now that I saw this blog entry stating that there
are much more efficient/effective ways to test your code, I'm not sure I
: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 1:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OT: Unit testing sucks?
On 10/19/05, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This guy thinks unit testing is way overrated and a waste of time:
Well, that's not really what he's saying... his real objection is that
unit testing
This should work:
ReFind((name)(=|)(.*?)\b,myString,1,false)
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 2:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Regex help.
I need to get formfield names from a plain html doc loaded as
a string.
.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2005 4:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Regex help.
This should work:
ReFind((name)(=|)(.*?)\b,myString,1,false)
-Original Message-
From: Emmet McGovern [mailto
Well, refind and friends all return a position in the string. I don't
know of a way to have the desired substring returned instead of the
position of the substring. Are you saying you can use a look ahead to
have a substring returned from refind?
-Original Message-
From: Taco Fleur
Ah, we are discussing the difference between 5 bytes and 1 byte in RAM?
Well, to each his own, whatever works. ;) Actually, to be honest I got
the positions/subexpressions idea from the MM docs, so I can't take
credit for that.
-Original Message-
From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL
the like part down to the
length that fits :)
On 17/10/05, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There may be a fix for this, or maybe it's a bug. But I've
had problems
doing QofQ before, and I normally just find a way to work around it.
I'd split the huge amounts of text your searching
That's odd...you responded to his question with a translation of his
question into Italian. I've never seen that before. ;)
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 10:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: try this again...
Yeah, you're right. They were denying stuff like 'JavaScript', but
allowing anything that wasn't on their deny list. The problem is they
want to allow as much stuff as possible to make it cool for the users,
while not allowing too much. It should be possible to only allow a
small set of
You'd have to play around with it, but I've created scripts for telnet
clients before. If you write a script for your favorite ssh/telnet
client to login to the linux server and execute the shell script, you
can then cfexecute that script.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Colman
You should also join and/or search the mailing list. There have been a
LOT of very helpful threads covering most of the basic help people need
when starting with CFE:
http://www.cfeclipse.org/go/project/lists
-Original Message-
From: Victor Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
related to dynamically creating a form for later
submission. If you are only outputting data, this will
probably work
cross-browser.
I guess one could determine this by viewing the DOM viewer
that comes
with FF's and IE's web developer toolbars.
M!ke
On 10/15/05, Munson, Jacob
Just trying to wrap my head around this one, because it looks
interesting. Not sure I'll be much help...
So, if the length of your string is between 190 and 193, the LIKE
section is fired and works fine? But if string length 193 the LIKE
section fires and you get a 200 error? That is strange,
Did you try cfsqltype=cf_sql_longvarchar instead of cf_sql_varchar?
-Original Message-
From: Jedi Homer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 9:43 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: QoQ, CFQueryParam and LIKE
Simplified version:
cfset qry = QueryNew(Copy) /
cfset
Win 2000) and CF 6.1
(running Linux)
On 17/10/05, Munson, Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you try cfsqltype=cf_sql_longvarchar instead of
cf_sql_varchar?
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web
I guess I'm confused...what do you mean by '..not quick enough to
display the new data'. Do you need to use cfflush to make sure the data
is output as it happens?
-Original Message-
From: CHANCE, JENNIFER M. (JSC-BJ) (BAS)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005
before the code that updates the
database in the cfinclude has had a chance to finish
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 2:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Cfinclude processing
I guess I'm confused...what do you mean
/41763D1 george a romeros land of the
dead dvd.htm
Any ideas? I have updated the connectors also. That did not help.
TIA
Jacob
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http
From: Robert Everland III
I have used CFEclipse and I have used Homesite +, they are
both alright
I beg to differ. CFEclipse is way beyond 'alright'. ;)
[INFO] -- Access Manager:
This transmission may contain information that is privileged, confidential
and/or exempt from disclosure
Michael,
I don't use much JS to do something with the cfajax results. I
preformat all the data in the CF function by stuffing HTML into the
variable that gets returned. Then I just use a simple function to stuff
all the HTML and data into a div or something:
//This function does the cfajax
Has anybody here used http://xtreme-host.com/? I found them recently,
and the base plan is $3.95/mo with CF, MySQL and all the other standard
features. I haven't ran into any CF coding restrictions yet, but there
may be some.
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL
Oh, and by the way, no setup fees, and no annual agreement (for
http://xtreme-host.com/). And so far their support has been timely and
very helpful (none of the 'Did you make sure you refreshed your
browser?' kind of crap).
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL
1201 - 1300 of 1532 matches
Mail list logo
