oops, forgot to paste,
on the top.
> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
>
>
>
> var doSomething = function() {
> document.getElementById('populateMe').value = 'You just clicked on
> #URL.param1#';
> }
>
>
>
Please try the following code, you'll see URL.param1 is not available upon
Button click. On the other hand, the cfdebug has the following info:
"
info:http: Replacing markup for element: testWin_body from URL
test.cfm?param1=cat with params _cf_containerId=testWin_body
info:widget: Navigating t
Let me re-phrase the question, does anyone know of a way to suppress cfajax
related err msg? I don't care about the err msg because the flow and data are
ok. tks.
> Hi,
>
> I'm in the process of converting an older version cf app to cf8.
> cfwindow is a 'star' tag for the new version. Form
Hi,
I'm in the process of converting an older version cf app to cf8. cfwindow is a
'star' tag for the new version. Form submission/process goes to the same page.
The previous form looks like this:
form
e1, e2,
function 1 (using input type="submit" name="myFunction1" value="Do A")
function 2 (
Hi,
I'm looking for some whitepaper-like writing on the intricacy of cf8's UI tags
such as cflayout, cfwindow, cfpod, then, for the presentation part,
cfpresentation etc.
Adobe's devnet has some basic thing going... googling results unsatisfactory,
any thoughts/points would be much appreciated.
on thread titled "cfthread nor not? -- any best practice out there?", my two
follow-up posts yesterday did not show up, so, just want to post a quick note
to say thanks. After some documentation digging I know now why the "threaded"
one initially did not load fast as expected, problem resolved.
I'm using cffeed for a bunch of rss feeds (specifically 4 feeds for now). For
code reuse, I have a component which has a function for passing parameters
including source (as a structure).
One approach (named A):
Not using cfthread, execution seems reasonably fast.
http://24.254.1.94:8000/cf8/sm
Thanks for the input on its technicality, probably I'll be ok, used to write
DOS batch files, even comfortable with Unix shell scripting, cshell? kshell?
More likely the former... But I won't have competitive advantage getting back
to heavy javascripting if AIR requires that (ADOBE docs haven't
Are you 'miniking' my time management app, http://www.mytata.net/, probably
not, more likely coincidence, google "measure time management" see what you
get...
>Here is an AIR app/widget we created specifically for a business need.
>
>http://timer.vertabase.com
>
>Its to track time on projects or
Thanks for your input.
>You can create HTML AIR applications using the SDK and the Aptana IDE.
>
>Steve "Cutter" Blades
>Adobe Certified Professional
>Advanced Macromedia ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 softwar
I know I need air but do I need Adobe's AIR or not? Please provide some
business case other than the Adobe's sample app links, and better your own AIR
app (hopefully not too slow).
Thank you.
P.S. I don't have FLEX nor graphics designer's background.
~
http://www.briankotek.com/blog/index.cfm/2006/7/24/Adobe-Should-Stop-Trying-To-Make-CF-Like-Java
Though it's over a year old I still like its thoughts/POVs, btw, I'm just
getting back to the cf world...
~|
Adobe® ColdFusion® 8
> > spending money).
>
> There are free (and/or very cheap) CF hosts.
My concern is the IP protection, not too sure if the free/cheap CF hosts truly
protect what I host there, if bad thing happens law suit? I'd rather stay away
from hassle...
> > Were you not able to access my semantic search
> On Tuesday 11 Dec 2007, d l wrote:
> > The thing is my ISP blocks port 80
>
> Is this because you're not meant to be running any|production services
> on it,
> by any chance ?
> I choose my ISP because they explictly *did* allow running servers
> over
> On Monday 10 Dec 2007, d l wrote:
> > -- The previous url has been replaced by a permanent one,
> > http://web.mytata.net:8000/TextSearch/search.cfm
>
> Not port 80 ? This may cause some people problems...
>
> --
> Tom Chiverton
> Helping to augmenta
I share your sentiment about Verity's capability though I appreciate its speed.
And that's the very reason why I tried something else.
The semantic search technique that I'm using now, imho, provides better search
results, record rendering even with cf4.5 against a ms sql server 2000 database
Update:
-- The previous url has been replaced by a permanent one,
http://web.mytata.net:8000/TextSearch/search.cfm
-- More impotantly, it's now on cf8 and SPEED has improved SUBSTANTIALLY.
-- The key scoring algothrithm is to calculate and assign each term a score,
adding them up for each target d
Problem resolved by the workaround of placing cfc files under IIS web server's
root directory, but that's nuts, Adobe's CF8 project manager were not doing a
good job, imho...
> Additional note:
> Per the thread of ajaxproxy, http://www.houseoffusion.
> com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid:5405
Additional note:
Per the thread of ajaxproxy,
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid:54051,
have just tried the approach of copy ajax related folders and files to my IIS
web root directory or its subdirectory of 'scripts' to no avail neither.
> Using Ben's sample, callin
Using Ben's sample, calling a cfc:ajax_functionA.methodB({cfautosuggestvalue})
from a cf template serviced by jrun internal web server would work while
attempting to have IIS 5 to service the same CF template would fail.
Some facts:
-- The same IIS 5 web server works fine with other CF8 templates
"Obviously we will deploy on a nice new server,"
that's because you have more resources while I don't.
>Dear all
>
>We've been merrily running quite a big intranet on CF 5.1 for years but
>it's time to take advantage of some of the new stuff in CF8.
>
>Obviously we will deploy on a nice new server
Richard,
A couple of notes may be of reference to you since I "just" installed cf8
standard trial edition on an XP box with an existing cf4.5 supporting a
"simple" app and yes they now seem to live happily together using the same IIS
5 web server.
a) be very careful about various firewall/anti-
>So is this an app that you will host or will you potentially release it?
>
>If you will only host is it available as a webservice?
>
>Is it commercial or General use? etc..
Richard,
I've whipped cf8 to do its job (have set up a Web Service for this
semantic/conceptual search component), send me
Man, too many hidden firewalls...
> Hi,
>
> A web service on my cf8 box works fine when accessed locally (even
> invoking with regular Internet protocol for the box like
> webservice="http://24.254.xx.xx:8000/ws/provideThing.cfc?wsdl";).
> What this service does is to run a query and to re
the err msg of "Invalid object name 'CDN100'" seems to suggest that the driver
may be expecting something like [dbName].[dbOwner].[tableName] notation, try
that, I know JDBC driver likes that; also, everyone else's notes all make some
sense...
>CF5.0 - SQL2k
>
>I am getting a "Base table not fo
rt a new,
> clearer one here,
> ---
> Jochem van Dieten12/04/2007 12:57 PM
> Link: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.
> cfm/threadid:54412#294176
> d l wrote:
> > Another thing, most likely the CF Admin migration would look at some
&
Update:
Problem mostly resolved. Read, read, dig, dig...
However, the FQDN mapping mysteriously messed up... I'll figure it out with my
service provider...
> Status:
> -- my xp box has cf4.5 installed using IIS5.1 web server at port 8000
> and it's desirble to keep cf4.5 running at least for
For some odd reason my follow-up was not posted, so, start a new, clearer one
here,
---
Jochem van Dieten12/04/2007 12:57 PM
Link:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/thread.cfm/threadid:54412#294176
d l wrote:
> Another thing, most likely the CF Ad
Status:
-- my xp box has cf4.5 installed using IIS5.1 web server at port 8000
and it's desirble to keep cf4.5 running at least for now.
-- cf8 standard 30day trial version for Windows is currently running and it
points to its internal jrun web server (web port:8501, jrun and its web server
co
>d l wrote:
>
>This port is not for the communication between CF and JRun, but between
>IIS and JRun.
>
>
>
>No, that is not needed.
>
>
>> Also, netstat indicates that 6 instances of
>> TCP jrun is listening at port 1012
>
>1012 is a privileged
> d l wrote:
> > And I would think the following would tell Jrun or the like NOT to
> use its internal web server,
> >
> >
> >
> > 8501
> > *
> > true
>
> Try it?
>
>
> > Then, move on to use an external web
Thanks, Jochem, and good to hear from you after these years ...
more below...
> d l wrote:
> > And I would think the following would tell Jrun or the like NOT to
> use its internal web server,
> >
> >
> >
> > 8501
> > *
> > tru
Could we consider this file as a configuration file for CF8 (my box OS is
Windows XP)?
And I would think the following would tell Jrun or the like NOT to use its
internal web server,
8501
*
true
...
Then, move on to use an external web server part and I would think the f
> 1. Installation Error (from the log file)
> "Web Server Connector Configuration Error
> Status: ERROR
> Additional Notes: ERROR - JNDI port 2930 for server coldfusion is not
> active
> "
> netstate -ab revealed that
> this box has 4 copies of
1. Installation Error (from the log file)
"Web Server Connector Configuration Error
Status: ERROR
Additional Notes: ERROR - JNDI port 2930 for server
coldfusion is not active
"
netstate -ab revealed that
this box has 4 copies of jrun running incl
I figured it out. It's working as I expected in my original post. Some
overhead, mainly a browser needs an extension that supports W3C XForms
standard. Very useful technology imho.
>You're going to have to have SOME sort of processing engine to use in saving
>the content. Javascript can't writ
This is beyond ColdFusion and I apologize if it's totally OT.
Here's the thing. I'd like to caputure simple user data via a web brower
without a web server.
More detail:
a) give a user an xhtml interface file or the like, who
opens it with IE6/7 or Firefox(1.5/2.0);
b) the user fills the for
> On Thursday 29 Nov 2007, d l wrote:
> > > But for one site 'energy' bringing back 'geothermal' may be OK,
> but on
> > > another
> > > site 'zen' would be a much better choice.
> > Excellent point! We need to know our audi
>So is this an app that you will host or will you potentially release it?
>
>If you will only host is it available as a webservice?
>
>Is it commercial or General use? etc..
I'm shooting to host it as sort of SaaS service offering a free trial period
and then charge a reasonable fee, and to be h
Thanks for the great input and the SA pointer. And as you imply in reality
things are easier said than done. Also, some times one may opt for more
relevant results than more accurate results while others may differ... or it
depends on context etc. etc.
Don
P.S. I remember you, hope you're doi
> On Thursday 29 Nov 2007, d l wrote:
> > "my own set of domain knowledge / weightings "
> > Sure, imho, the "key word" here is "good enough", and probably cost
> > effective as well.
>
> Maybe.
> But for one site 'energy'
>What's are you offering?
A better database search service on a small scale.
And consider to ignore the noise of google this and google that (no one says
google is bad nor people are not appreciative of their service...)
~|
"my own set of domain knowledge / weightings "
Sure, imho, the "key word" here is "good enough", and probably cost effective
as well.
> On Tuesday 27 Nov 2007, d l wrote:
> > I know Verity and Google search etc. etc. Try the following if
> you'
James,
Got your email, will send you email tomorrow. Thks.
Don
> DL,
>
> You can find my email address here:
>
> http://www.omnibrow.com/deleteme.txt
>
> sorry for the runaround, but I don't want to post it online
> permanently and as soon as you email me, i will be taking it down.
>
>
-- find sql env
select @@version;
--Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818 (Intel X86)
-- dll
create table #tmp (sYear int, sNum int);
-- dml test data population
insert into #tmp
values(1950,12);
insert into #tmp
values(1950,9);
insert into #tmp
values(1955,11);
-- dml solution
-- looks like yo
Update:
-- Have improved query performance substantially;
-- Add additional notes...
-- If we're talking about searching against a specific set of data, say, a
particular
data column in a database's table then, this approach, imho, kicks ass. So,
probably
one could consider to use it against the
James,
Yes, it would cost money but not expensive...
It has nothing to do with Verity nor Google. What's your email address? We
could discuss more offline.
Don
> dl,
>
> I was the one who posted about Verity.
>
> Sadly, I didnt understand your email or find any more information on
> your w
Greetings to all,
I know Verity and Google search etc. etc. Try the following if you're
interested in the topic, but before you begin let me issue some warnings:
a) I'm not implementing some of the stuff that a beginner programmer would have
implemented such as telling peole, oh query does not
48 matches
Mail list logo