I really hate being a bad guy. I try to be good, I try to be nice, but once
in a while someone does something to really upset me and I get the urge to
be bad. This 'something' that a person can do is usually something stupid.
Yes, I said stupid. People who act without thinking really upset me and
as far as I can tell, house of fusion mailing lists still do not
have a Precendence: bulk header in them, informing most
vacation programs not to reply ...
--
Larry W. Virden mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.purl.org/net/lvirden/>
Even if explicitly stated to the contrary, nothing in this
eroga
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 8:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
I really hate being a bad guy. I try to be good, I try to be nice, but once
in a while someone does something to really
MAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 8:43 AM
Subject: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
> I really hate being a bad guy.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the offic
If this was an isolated incident on a single, fringe list I'd agree but in
almost all cases the person is subscribed to either CF-Talk or JRun-Talk
only.
I recognize that there's a need for a new interface and will place one up
today.
> The only thing I have to say to this is that with all the l
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 07:44
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
>
> [snip of the rant]
> The major problem other than having a TON of garbage posts abo
ED]]
> Sent: 15 January 2001 13:44
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
>
>
> I really hate being a bad guy. I try to be good, I try to be
> nice, but once
> in a while someone does something to really upset me and I get the urge to
> be bad. This '
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 10:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
I am totally in agreement with this - it really annoys me when you get 20-30
"I'm on holiday" messages within the first hour of a day
If I had more time I would
eron
Cameron Childress
elliptIQ Inc.
p.770.460.7277.232
f.770.460.0963
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:39 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
>
> Beyond that, I think its a good thing to stay current on lists over
> vacation. I know that Outlook also has the option to do some advanced
> filteringso I'll try to be more careful in the future.
>
I'll agree with that. However, then don't set a 'macro / agent / autoresponder /
whate
>However, I'm not sure the proposed solution will work. MSOutlook (who I
>suspect is the primary 'culprit') has an option to send the OOO notice only
>once to each email address.
But each post in cf is posted as the mail sender; BFlynn, Robert Everland,
Gavin Myers. So MS Outlook will reply to e
one... :)
-Cameron
Cameron Childress
elliptIQ Inc.
p.770.460.7277.232
f.770.460.0963
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:39 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: (Admin) Vacations a
Cameron Childress wrote:
> AFAIK, autoresponders are a mail server function,
> not a mail client function. This setting will most likely only
> be available to people using Exchange Server w/Outlook or some
> other server/client software such as Lotus.
I was about to say the same thing. People
Jeff
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 12:43 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
>
>
> > However, I'm not sure the proposed solution will work.
> MSOutlook (w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron,
While this thread has demonstrated why autoresponders should remain
on the server side, Outlook does have the capability to be an
autoresponder. For example, if I go on vacation I can leave my
computer on, have my mail client pop the server
Michael
Maybe there is a way to give intelligent people (like most of those
on this list) the best of both worlds:
Be able to set a simple autoresponder for an email address, easily, whenever
they are not available
Have the lists be able to detect a token in the subject & not propagat
Subject: OT RE: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Cameron,
While this thread has demonstrated why autoresponders should remain
on the server side, Outlook does have the capability to be an
autoresponder. For example, if I go on vacation I can leave my
co
Like someone's going to follow a standard for auto-responders. ;)
Don't get me wrong, I think the idea has merit but the same people who set
their auto-responders on a list also tend to be the same people who don't
use subject headers.
I'm going to take all messages with certain subjects and have
Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 January 2001 15:49
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Suggestion was: Re: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
Michael
Maybe there is a way to give intelligent people (like most of those
on this list) the best of both worlds:
Be able to set a simple autoresponder f
>I'm going to take all messages with certain subjects and have them stored
>without being sent to the list. A moderator will then be able to come in and
>check if a message is list-worthy or garbage. This allows an auto-sweeper
>solution with human intervention to avoid mistakes, the best of both
> -Original Message-
> From: Cameron Childress [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 11:43
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: (Admin) Vacations and being banned
>
> [deleteia]
Actually, with Microsoft Exchange Server 5.5, this setting is PURELY o
Ryan wrote:
> >I'm going to take all messages with certain subjects and have them stored
> >without being sent to the list. A moderator will then be able to come in and
> >check if a message is list-worthy or garbage. This allows an auto-sweeper
> >solution with human intervention to avoid mist
22 matches
Mail list logo
