Ditto's .. it makes for lazy programming .. very much like the Netscape
debate that took place last week .. if something ain't right, CF lets you
know it...
02
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
http://www.quilldesign.com
SiteDirector v2.0 - Commerce Builder
> > However, what I'd like to see is for
> However, what I'd like to see is for cf to allow for
> variables to be used if they aren't declared. Sort of
> like in PHP. The variable $var1 exists as null if it
> gets called.
This would, in my opinion, be a very very bad thing. The ability to use
variables without declaring them is a hug
ent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
Personally, I don't know about any others, but I want my ECMA syntax for
CFScript (It can't be that tall of an order can it!?), perhaps reverse
compatability could be put in, but the GT-LT-thing bites me
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Silcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF's Most Wanted ::
(Features, that is...)
With all this talk of learning other languages to flesh out your portfolio,
and more importantly your knowle
Shawn Grover wrote:
> With the below messages in mind, is there any way to configure IIS to spool
> form data to disk, rather than memory? specifically the File Form elements.
Don't think so. However, what might make a difference is calling CF not
as an ISAPI extension (iscf.dll), but as a cgi e
Shawn Grover wrote:
> In terms of standards, I agree. If a standard already exists that does the
> job, then it should not be changed.
>
> However, the HTTP upload standard is slightly flawed. Or at least the
> current implementations of it are. If I upload a 100 Megabyte file (and
> there are
> And I don't recall any setting in CF Administrator (or
> IIS) that allows you to specify if form data is stored
> to disk or memory. Am I missing something here?
No, I don't think so. I don't think you can do that with CF - you're stuck
with the architecture that MM gave you. All I was saying
Couldn't this be done using a flash component?
John Venable
Director of Web Architecture
Epilepsy Foundation
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden
To: CF-Talk
Sent: 4/23/02 12:20 PM
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael (Alan Bl
]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 11:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: IIS Configuration? (was RE: CF's Most Wanted ::)
> With the below messages in mind, is there any way to
> configure IIS to spool form data to disk, rather than
> memory? specifically the File Form elements.
When you P
> With the below messages in mind, is there any way to
> configure IIS to spool form data to disk, rather than
> memory? specifically the File Form elements.
When you POST data to a CF page, I think that IIS simply hands off the
entire request to CF, which is then responsible for where the data
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
> However, the HTTP upload standard is slightly flawed. Or
> at least the current implementations of it are. If I
> upload a 100 Megabyte file (and there are occasional
> cases where this is needed), then the server MUST have
> 100 Megabytes
> However, the HTTP upload standard is slightly flawed. Or
> at least the current implementations of it are. If I
> upload a 100 Megabyte file (and there are occasional
> cases where this is needed), then the server MUST have
> 100 Megabytes of available memory. Now tie that upload
> in with o
result, we have limited the system to one file at a time.
My two cents worth.
Shawn Grover
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF's Most Wanted ::
Shawn Grover wrote:
> On the
Thanks Ray, in fact everytime I do type session, application or server,
I actually say that phrase "repeat after me..."
Thanks for that; I get strange looks now and people are moving desks ;)
__
Get the mailserver that powers
Shawn Grover wrote:
> On the topic of CFFILE and uploading, I would luv to see some kinda of
> reliable, efficient tool to allow uploading of multiple files/folder
> structures.
>
> The only way to handle this currently is to either include multiple File
> Input boxes on your form, or use a third
> -Original Message-
> From: Rafael (Alan Bleiweiss) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
>
>
> My all-time favorite request: Drag and drop file upload into
> a web base
My all-time favorite request: Drag and drop file upload into a web based
CF Form
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofit
rom a CFFile
tag somehow.
Maybe it's just wishful thinking on my part, but, that's the idea of this
thread isn't it?
Shawn Grover
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 9:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF's Most Wan
You can send multiple attachments in cf4.5+ - using cfmailparam tag.
---
Billy Cravens
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 10:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF's Most Wanted ::
Hmmm why is this one going on so lo
is a journey, not a destination!!"
Doug Brown
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 7:09 AM
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
> Already there:
>
>
> mimeattach=&q
> 4. Make CFQuery more powerful...I wan't the ability to
> scroll up and down through recordsets. I want the ability
> to have recordsets be updated with new data from the
> database without having to requery.
While I understand you can do this in ADO, it seems to me that much of the
complexit
5 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF's Most Wanted ::
(Features, that is...)
With all this talk of learning other languages to flesh out your
portfolio, and more importantly your knowledge, along with the looming
release of NEO/CFMX, I've been trying to think of the features that I
currently mi
>>I use XFile from SoftArtisans, and like it very
>>much, but it's ActiveX, so it wont work in Netscape. Javascript
file://
>>validation does not work in NS4.
SA has a Java version of XFile, JFile, that works with NS.
---
Billy Cravens
Already there:
---
Billy Cravens
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 6:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF's Most Wanted ::
You have to uplaod files to the server, before you can use them in
the mail tag Billy. Th
Hi Peoples
Well, I can say, since its public knowledge in some circles that locking
will no longer be required with Neo - the server will handle this side
of things. CFMX has addressed the fact that failure to lock shared
scope vairables will not cause memory corruption while a write operation
i
At 11:41 PM 4/22/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Just a wish list,no need to pick it apart, but my respones are inline :)
I didn't mean to offend. ;)
> >>4. Make CFQuery more powerful...I wan't the ability to scroll up and
> >>down through recordsets. I want the ability to have recordsets be
> >>upda
At 08:24 PM 4/22/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> > Are there any systems in existence where two separate systems can
>share
> > the same RAM? What is wrong with using Client Variables for this
>purpose?
> >
>I think you misunderstand what he is looking for. He wants to persist
>data across server node
ser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:56 PM
>Subject: Re: CF's Most Wanted ::
>
>
> > At 07:26 PM 4/22/2002 -0700, you wrote:
> > >Ok, my turn
> > >
> > >1) No more
sage-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 23 April 2002 3:18 p.m.
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
>
>
> You can with JavaScript.
>
> You could have a hidden form field, when the page is Submitted some
> JavaSc
Just a wish list,no need to pick it apart, but my respones are inline :)
Jeffry Houser wrote:
> At 09:55 PM 4/22/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>Trying to stay out of NeoLand...here is my wishlist:
>>
>>1. Integrated client-side file uploading tool, that is not an applet or
>>aciveX. Probably meaning
LOL. Thanks. Guess this old dog could still learn some new tricks. Or are those
"old" tricks...hehe
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffry Houser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:56 PM
Subjec
You can't do this with most browsers because of the JavaScript security
sandbox.
-Matt
> -Original Message-
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 8:18 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
>
> Yo
> Are there any systems in existence where two separate systems can
share
> the same RAM? What is wrong with using Client Variables for this
purpose?
>
I think you misunderstand what he is looking for. He wants to persist
data across server nodes. The storage method, in-memory, file system, or
Yes, you can do that much. Pretty sure you can't write to the field
using JS. I'd love to see a demo!
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 23 April 2002 3:18 p.m.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
You can with JavaScr
You can with JavaScript.
You could have a hidden form field, when the page is Submitted some
JavaScript takes the value of the File box and stores it in the form field,
then submits the form.
It allows you to grab the exact text and the file content.
>It's quite hard to work with if you are b
> What is wrong with ? It is not an
> applet nor activeX.
It's quite hard to work with if you are building a form with validation.
There's no way to put an address in to it, thus no way to reload the
form with the field filled.
Regards,
Matthew Walker
/*
Cabbage Tree Creative Ltd
At 09:55 PM 4/22/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Trying to stay out of NeoLand...here is my wishlist:
>
>1. Integrated client-side file uploading tool, that is not an applet or
>aciveX. Probably meaning it would have to be Flash.
What is wrong with ? It is not an
applet nor activeX.
>2. A multi-ser
At 07:26 PM 4/22/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Ok, my turn
>
>1) No more funky "dock-all" button for studio. Instead, fix it so that we
>can re-order the tabs on our resource windows to our
>liking.
Right click on the tab and drag?
--
Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need a Web Develope
Ok, my turn
1) No more funky "dock-all" button for studio. Instead, fix it so that we can
re-order the tabs on our resource windows to our
liking.
2) Make CF smart enough to use "=" and "!=" in the cfif comparison statements. This
shouldn't be that difficult, should it?
Trying to stay out of NeoLand...here is my wishlist:
1. Integrated client-side file uploading tool, that is not an applet or
aciveX. Probably meaning it would have to be Flash.
2. A multi-server in memory variable scope. If the site has multiple
servers, and even if the content is being served
gt; >-Original Message-
> >From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: 23 April 2002 00:05
> >To: CF-Talk
> >Subject: Re: CF's Most Wanted ::
> >
> >
> >You have to uplaod files to the server, before you can use them in
> >the ma
gt;
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 3:16 PM
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
> Huh? You can already attach files - and what would server-side
code be
> "uploading" to?
>
> ---
> Billy Cravens
>
>
> -Original Messa
I'd like to see more robust CFCASE performance: the ability to handle ranges, and
ranges+items, rather than just items. I ran into this when porting an auto insurance
rating system over to CF and this was the biggest pet peeve.
You can work around the limitation, of course, but its a lot nicer
o: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
> Abilty to resize images on the fly, store in cache, read
> dimensions, etc.
> (should be a cinch with Macromedia's expertise in graphic
> products [yea, right])
There are plenty of CFX tags out there that do this. I'm
u still
have to play games with your host's support.
---
Billy Cravens
(who thinks there is such a thing as TOO MUCH out of the box
functionality)
-Original Message-
From: Rick Eidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF's
79-2844 fax: (203)879-6254
http://www.uxbinternet.com/
http://dennis.uxb.net/
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 11:23 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
> And if there is a need for cflock, why doesn't client v
Huh? You can already attach files - and what would server-side code be
"uploading" to?
---
Billy Cravens
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF's Most Wanted ::
I would like t
ahemyeah that too
"Success is a journey, not a destination!!"
Doug Brown
- Original Message -
From: "Jeff Green" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:49 PM
Subject: RE: CF&#
How about a rock solid dependable cfmail :)
jeff
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 2:09 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF's Most Wanted ::
I would like to see an uplaod feature built in to for
attachments!!!
"Su
ags without having to
plonk ugly
> cfoutput tags inside each invocation.
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tyler Silcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:05 AM
> Subject: CF's Most Wan
riginal Message -
From: "Tyler Silcox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2002 2:05 AM
Subject: CF's Most Wanted ::
> (Features, that is...)
>
> With all this talk of learning other languages to flesh out your
p
il 22, 2002 10:17 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
>
>
>I think would be great to start seeing some of the custom tags built in to
>new versions of CF. I have some sites that are hosted on servers I do not
>control so I can't use some cutome tags or i
> Raymond
> >>There will _always_ be
> >>a need for "logical" type locks.
>
> why will there always be a need for using cflock with session
> variables.
> Should they manage muliple access automatically?
I wasn't talking about always needing locks for session vars. I'm
talking about issues like
> And if there is a need for cflock, why doesn't client vars
> use them?
There aren't any concurrency issues for Client variables. They're not stored
in memory. They're typically stored in a database or registry, which will
provide its own concurrency controls, or in cookies, which have no
concu
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 22 April 2002 15:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
> Abilty to resize images on the fly, store in cache, read
> dimensions, etc.
> (should be a cinch with Macromedia's experti
.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder & Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Eidson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 7:17 AM
Subject: RE:
, 2002 10:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
I think would be great to start seeing some of the custom tags built in to
new versions of CF. I have some sites that are hosted on servers I do not
control so I can't use some cutome tags or it takes me day's to get sup
-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted ::
> Abilty to resize images on the fly, store in cache, read
> dimensions, etc.
> (should be a cinch with Macromedia's expertise in gr
> Abilty to resize images on the fly, store in cache, read
> dimensions, etc.
> (should be a cinch with Macromedia's expertise in graphic
> products [yea, right])
There are plenty of CFX tags out there that do this. I'm not saying we
shouldn't do it - just that solutions exist already.
Sorry, I meant CFGRID.
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: CF's Most Wanted ::
> Yes, those of you in NEO land, please make sure that CFGRAPH is a
> stable, full
> Yes, those of you in NEO land, please make sure that CFGRAPH is a
> stable, fully developed feature.
>
Why not buy an add-on that is intended as a graphing product, rather than a
bolt on??
__
Signup for the Fusion Authority n
Yes, those of you in NEO land, please make sure that CFGRAPH is a
stable, fully developed feature.
- Matt Small
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Silcox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 10:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: CF's Most Wanted ::
(Features, that is...)
(Features, that is...)
With all this talk of learning other languages to flesh out your portfolio, and more
importantly your knowledge, along with the looming release of NEO/CFMX, I've been
trying to think of the features that I currently miss in my ColdFusion. And I thought
what better way t
63 matches
Mail list logo
