Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread Charlie Griefer
e - Original Message - From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 11:25 AM Subject: Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question > Ya I haven't looked too closely yet at "tab

Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread Rafael Bleiweiss
>I've seen the various css layout sites (http://www.csszengarden.com/ being >one of my favorites), and they're all great to show what could be done...but >IMO it's still not practical to try and develop a full site using only CSS >for layout. Completely agree! Building three sites, all on limite

RE: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread Sandy Clark
Try these sites for some good css/layouts. http://glish.com/css/ http://www.bluerobot.com/web/layouts/ http://realworldstyle.com/ http://www.fu2k.org/alex/css/layouts/3Col_OrderedAbsolute.mhtml Keep in mind though that when using web standards, you have to be designing for web standard compatibl

Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread jonhall
Tuesday, August 12, 2003, 1:53:25 PM, you wrote: IS> You bring up something that I have debated in my head many times. How can IS> anybody bring about better browser compliance so that it is easier to make IS> good clean and accessible web pages. IS> I have been working on a project for the last

Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread Bryan Stevenson
; for the browser manufacturers to be held somewhat accountable. > Again...naive/idealistic view? Perhaps. The alternative is none to > appealing, unfortunately. > > charlie > > > - Original Message - > From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > T

Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread Bryan Stevenson
Ya I haven't looked too closely yet at "tableless" page design yet, but I know some folks locally have gone full blown CSS only. Now I've seen this approach totally blow up (yes Netscape). The problem there was that it wasn't just a bit different between IE and NSin NS all content was crammed

Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread Charlie Griefer
ind of supporting the standards is like kind of being a little bit pregnant. charlie - Original Message - From: "Sandy Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 12:09 PM Subject: RE: Crossborwse

Re: RE: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread ksuh
Don't forget http://www.oswd.org - Original Message - From: Sandy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:09 pm Subject: RE: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question > Try these sites for some good css/layouts. > > > http:

Re: Crossborwser support WAS: Simple html question

2003-08-14 Thread Rafael Bleiweiss
Forgive me if anyone mentioned this: http://www.css-discuss.org/ hundreds of posts to this group's list are typical in a given day... full wiki on the site... LOTS of opinions about should and shouldn'ts, GREAT for help - almost as high a quality help as CF-TALK! - :-) OH - and if you want