First make sure you have java installed.. go to java.com and install
the latest version..
If that doesn't work, go into IE's tool menu, then internet options,
then advanced and allow the java stuff!
At 05:03 PM 11/26/2007, you wrote:
>How can I get IE7 to stop protecting me from my CF administ
> How can I get IE7 to stop protecting me from my CF
> administrator's evil attempts to allow me to browse the file
> system to set up mappings, ect.
> with Java applets.
Add your CF Administrator URL to IE's "Trusted Sites" zone? I think that'll
do it.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http:
ithin this
communication are not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Feb 08 22:45:28 2007
Subject: Re: IE7 vs IE6
>>Yeah, IE7 standalone is *not* an installed and wo
Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08 February 2007 22:45
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 vs IE6
>>Yeah, IE7 standalone is *not* an installed and working copy of IE7, it
cannot be trusted (for developing, not in general!)
Ok, then what's about standard IE7 + IE6 stand alone? Is
>>Yeah, IE7 standalone is *not* an installed and working copy of IE7, it
cannot be trusted (for developing, not in general!)
Ok, then what's about standard IE7 + IE6 stand alone? Is it possible?
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.co
website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Jacob Munson
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Feb 08 21:53:31 2007
Subject: Re: IE7 vs IE6
I've found that these standalone IE installs don't do things the same
way that IE does. I tested CFQuickDocs with a standalone IE 7 beta
inst
I've found that these standalone IE installs don't do things the same
way that IE does. I tested CFQuickDocs with a standalone IE 7 beta
installer (before it was released), and most of my JS stuff didn't
work. But it works fine with the official IE 7. Microsoft has also
noted this in a blog entr
>>However, you might find this helpful:
It sure helps. Thanks
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks.
> From: Claude Schneegans [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Has any one tried IE7, and is it possible to run both version IE6 and
> IE7 concurrently on the same machine?
> Question of verifying code for both versions of course.
There is a standalone version of IE6 floating around, Google "IE6
Standalon
I run IE7 on my machine and IE6 through a Virtual Machine. I use VMWare
Player http://www.vmware.com/products/player/
Sandra Clark
==
http://www.shayna.com
Training in Cascading Style Sheets and Accessibility
-Original Message-
From: Claude Schneegans [mailto
> Has any one tried IE7, and is it possible to run both version IE6 and
> IE7 concurrently on the same machine?
I've installed IE 7 on most of the machines I use.
I haven't tried installing it while keeping IE 6. IE 7 will, by default,
remove and replace IE 6. However, you might find this helpful
Got it. For some reason, IE7 wouldn't accept my javascript function
calls directly within the script tag.Once I placed them inside a
"window.onload = function(){}", it seemed to like me again.
Odd that it logged me out as well Maybe one of the new security
features?
I <3 Inte
On 10/19/06, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> All in all, I uninstalled it and got IE 6 back, but frankly I'll personally
> call up M$ and tell them to eat a bowl of my nuts if they try and force this
> on me with a patch...
As an interesting side, that I wouldn't mind getting confirm
gmail is flopping around on a continuous refresh of a blank screen
today. Works great in FF but in IE7 its dead as a doornail
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Janitor, MSB Web Systems
mysecretbase.com
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Qu
Village, KS
913-748-8044 ext 4703
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Eric Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 11:54 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
They are hard to see...plus they are in a totally different location
from
other versions. It'
e not necessarily those expressed by Reed Exhibitions."
Visit our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Aebig
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Fri Oct 20 04:40:23 2006
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
>> It isn't rocket science moving the toolbars.
That's the problem. Eve
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 October 2006 18:35
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
- People can't find the Stop and Refresh buttons to save their lives
Umm.. it's right next to the address bar on the right. You know, the green
circle of arrows thing and the red X? :)
-Content man
different that the tabbed browsing in Firefox or Opera. You open a new
window and it opens a new tab...how is it any different in implementation?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 October 2006 16:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
Kevi
Nope...you can only have one or the other...
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 October 2006 14:17
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
Does anyone know if IE7 plays nice with IE6 still on the system?I
couldnt afford not to have a
How is it different?
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 October 2006 13:39
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
Good point... but ignoring them because they simply haven't been implemented
yet (Firefox) is a lot different than s
That's usually what software companies do...
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 19 October 2006 07:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: IE7 ?
Has anybody heard if MS is going to offer a version for windows 2000? I was
at their download page and they o
k.
!k
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:40 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
All due respect but not really a "review" and on the whole totally anti
Microsoft just "because".
It isn'
O god I wish. =]
!k
-Original Message-
From: Douglas Knudsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 5:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
You can thank MS though when the checks start rolling in from bilking, I
mean billing, your clients for 'upgrade' w
All of our software is browser based. We average approximately 3000 logins a
day over 8 applications.
!k
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
Not sure what "clients"
On 10/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - People can't find the Stop and Refresh buttons to save their lives
>
> Umm.. it's right next to the address bar on the right. You know, the green
> circle of arrows thing and the red X? :)
ummm yourself. Try sitting someone with bare m
- People can't find the Stop and Refresh buttons to save their lives
Umm.. it's right next to the address bar on the right. You know, the green
circle of arrows thing and the red X? :)
-Content management systems; particularly the wysiwyg editor pages,
are going to require a dedicated IE7 upgrade
s for the rant... got a little carried away there.
>
> Cheers,
>
> !k
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:07 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: IE7 ?
>
> From: "Kevin Aebig" &l
On 10/19/06, Munson, Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IIRC, IE5 was almost the same as IE6. The interface certainly didn't
> change much.
No it certainly didn't. IE6 fixed IE5's bugs, for the most part as I
recall and that was it.
What we're seeing so far:
- People can't find the Stop and Re
eil (RX) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:28:36 +0100
To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
I am suprised Microsoft Money makes any erm... Money :-)
And why is ColdFusion involved?! If at all.
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richm
edexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Oct 19 23:08:25 2006
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
I work on the team that handles (Edited to avoid any NDA issues) the web
based portion of a program which is made to help small buisness owners to
keep track of their finan
> As a side note, I'm sure people using IE 6 said the same
> thing about the
> change from IE 5 to IE6.
IIRC, IE5 was almost the same as IE6. The interface certainly didn't
change much.
-
"EMF " made the following annotations.
, 19 Oct 2006 22:57:41 +0100
To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
Which division of Microsoft do you work in?
"This e-mail is from Reed Exhibitions (Gateway House, 28 The Quadrant,
Richmond, Surrey, TW9 1DN, United Kingdom), a division of Reed Business,
Registered in En
our website at http://www.reedexpo.com
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Aebig
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Oct 19 22:45:08 2006
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
We have over 1750 direct clients and 1 indirect clients. Guess who
they're going to call when this shows up unexpectedly.
I honestly don'
TECTED]
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Oct 19 22:51:22 2006
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
I may be biased working at Microsoft and all, but I too had to update and
didn't like it. But after working with it for a day or so and getting used
to it again, I find it's MUCH better then IE6.
But then again, I'
. :)
Seriously though, give it a few days and play around with it. You may find
that you like it.
Original Message:
-
From: Mike Tangorre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 17:07:16 -0400
To: cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
From: "Kevin Aebig" <[EM
As a side note, I'm sure people using IE 6 said the same thing about the
change from IE 5 to IE6.
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .
~
m the
one getting to pick up the pieces.
My apologies for the rant... got a little carried away there.
Cheers,
!k
-Original Message-
From: Mike Tangorre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
From: "Kevin Aebig" <[
-
From: Kevin Aebig
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Oct 19 21:51:38 2006
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
FYI --
IE 7 is a complete piece of trash. I downloaded and installed it today to
test our software. Some reasons why:
- Poorly laid out & I can't seem to unlock the toolbars to move them
- Just like th
Kevin, like it or not, it's coming. I t's going to steamroller over
the top of you if you dont start running in the same direction as it's
going.
You mightn't like it, but in a surprisingly short time, a HUGE
proportion of your users are going to be using it, thanks to windows
update.
Whether yo
From: "Kevin Aebig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> All in all, I uninstalled it and got IE 6 back, but frankly I'll
> personally
> call up M$ and tell them to eat a bowl of my nuts if they try and force
> this
> on me with a patch...
>
> Wow... crap.
Tell us how you really feel!
Seriously though, why ar
> - It's completely a rip-off of the best GUI features of Opera, Firefox
Is that a criticism?
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta,
Chicago, Baltim
ally
call up M$ and tell them to eat a bowl of my nuts if they try and force this
on me with a patch...
Wow... crap.
!k
-Original Message-
From: Cutter (CFRelated) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 1:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
http://tredoso
ed)
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thu Oct 19 20:55:35 2006
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
Yes, November 1st.
Cutter
http://blog.cutterscrossing.com
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
> Ah, I don't bother about Windows Update ;-)
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Doug Bezona
don't bother about Windows Update ;-)
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Doug Bezona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 19 October 2006 16:22
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: IE7 ?
> >
> > But it isn't in Windows Update yet - that'
http://tredosoft.com/IE7_standalone
Cutter
http://blog.cutterscrossing.com
Mike Kear wrote:
> Does anyone know if IE7 plays nice with IE6 still on the system?I
> couldnt afford not to have a working IE6 on my machine.
>
> Cheers
> Mike Kear
> Windsor, NSW, Australia
> Adobe Cert
gt; To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: IE7 ?
>
> But it isn't in Windows Update yet - that's still a couple of weeks out.
>
>
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:Neil.Robertson-
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Thursday,
Mike:
http://ray.camdenfamily.com/index.cfm/2006/10/18/Oh-look--IE7-is-released
in the comments, somebody posted a link to http://browsers.evolt.org/,
where you can apparently download "standalone" versions of older IE
browsers. i'm sure they're stripped down to a point...but they likely
work we
2006 3:17 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: IE7 ?
>
> Does anyone know if IE7 plays nice with IE6 still on the system?I
> couldnt afford not to have a working IE6 on my machine.
>
> Cheers
> Mike Kear
> Windsor, NSW, Australia
> Adobe Certified Advanced Col
I don't know for sure, but I know that IE 6 removed the previous
version. I was able to find an installer on the web that would let me
keep IE 6 while testing IE 7 beta.
http://techfeed.net/blog/index.cfm/2006/7/17/IE-7-beta-3-standalone
You might be able to find something similar for IE 7 final.
Does anyone know if IE7 plays nice with IE6 still on the system?I
couldnt afford not to have a working IE6 on my machine.
Cheers
Mike Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
Adobe Certified Advanced ColdFusion Developer
AFP Webworks
http://afpwebworks.com
ColdFusion, PHP, ASP, ASP.NET hosting from AUD$15
>>but ignoring them because they simply haven't been implemented
yet (Firefox) is a lot different than simply ignoring them because you want
your way of doing things to become the standard (M$).
Right, however, when you look at the so called W3 standards, and see how
stupid
sometimes they are, y
On 10/19/06, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good point... but ignoring them because they simply haven't been implemented
> yet (Firefox) is a lot different than simply ignoring them because you want
> your way of doing things to become the standard (M$).
>
> !k
Yup... and safari is next
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 12:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
>
> W3C standards != M$ standards
>
Since when has any browser stuck to the standards.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages o
>
> W3C standards != M$ standards
>
Since when has any browser stuck to the standards.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting,
up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to
Good point. However, I checked CFQuickDocs in one of the betas, and
nothing worked. But I tried it in IE 7 last night and most of it worked
fine. Microsoft probably got a lot of complaints, because IE 7 was
aggressively blocking javascript events, which are common in Ajax sites.
> -Origina
their work with the final release.
!k
-Original Message-
From: Mingo Hagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
however the beta was here a couple of months ago, and a couple of RC's
between then and now as well, so you
however the beta was here a couple of months ago, and a couple of RC's
between then and now as well, so you could have checked a lot of your
sites already.
Mingo.
Kevin Aebig wrote:
> Because it's being released as a patch in the next couple of weeks and I
> want to make sure all the standards
Ah, I don't bother about Windows Update ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Bezona [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2006 16:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
But it isn't in Windows Update yet - that's still a couple of weeks out.
> -Original M
But it isn't in Windows Update yet - that's still a couple of weeks out.
> -Original Message-
> From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) [mailto:Neil.Robertson-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 11:18 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: IE7 ?
>
&g
Couple of weeks? IE7 is out now...
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/default.mspx?mg_ID=10010&CM=Features&CE=
Large
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2006 16:06
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
Because it's being released
No shit...They will just release IE8 and you will have to do it all over
again...:)
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Chiverton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:49 AM
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
> On Thursday 19 October 20
: Thursday, October 19, 2006 8:49 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
On Thursday 19 October 2006 15:21, Ray Champagne wrote:
> busy/lazy to deal with a complete reinstall. I guess the IE7 release will
> force the upgrade upon me)
Why bother ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to assertively lead inter
On Thursday 19 October 2006 15:21, Ray Champagne wrote:
> busy/lazy to deal with a complete reinstall. I guess the IE7 release will
> force the upgrade upon me)
Why bother ?
--
Tom Chiverton
Helping to assertively lead interdependent action-items
***
Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:57 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: IE7 ?
> Importance: High
>
> Extended support means that Microsoft will only provide security patches
for
> the OS. Which means your copy of IE6 will still have patches created as
> security vulnerabilities are fo
>> Has anybody heard if MS is going to offer a version for
>> windows 2000? I was at their download page and they only have
>> it for XP and 2003 server.
Ever used MS Money?
Once a version "runs out", it simply won't connect to your accounts any
more and you *HAVE* to upgrade, whether you want
Doug Brown wrote:
> Has anybody heard if MS is going to offer a version for windows 2000? I was
> at their download page and they only have it for XP and 2003 server. What's
> up with this? I am so sick of MS they just want you to upgrade their OS
> everytime a new version of windows comes out.
On Thursday 19 October 2006 14:31, Doug Brown wrote:
> "DEAL" with it...Lord knows a little piss-ant like myself dont matter to
> MS.
MS only cares about companies who by thousends at a time every 3 years -
witness it's attempts to *undercut the price of pirated versions of windows*
(!) in some
Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote:
> LOL... I suppose then your answer is...I bet you could get IE7 to run on
> Windows 2000 (even if it is standalone) but it would not be supported.
>
I'm betting the only way you will get to run IE7 on Win2000 is in a VM
running XP...or in a VM running linux wit
On 10/19/06, Ray Champagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not incite a fight, but why does this page say 2010? Do you have a link
> that says 2006 somewhere?
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3071
>
My bad... I though my initial research was pulling up correct data. Even so,
Extended
Buy an SPLA license from someone, then it wont cost you a fortune.
Russ
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2006 14:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
Well, I suppose my point is this. Netscape builds their browser to be
supported on just
day, October 19, 2006 6:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
Not incite a fight, but why does this page say 2010? Do you have a link
that says 2006 somewhere?
http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3071
> -Original Message-
> From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is extended support... usually means large corporations etc who buy it.
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifepolicy
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2006 14:47
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
Not incite a fight, but why does this
Not incite a fight, but why does this page say 2010? Do you have a link
that says 2006 somewhere?
http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3071
> -Original Message-
> From: Casey Dougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 9:02 AM
> To: CF-Talk
&
LOL... I suppose then your answer is...I bet you could get IE7 to run on
Windows 2000 (even if it is standalone) but it would not be supported.
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 October 2006 14:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
I did not
> Has anybody heard if MS is going to offer a version for
> windows 2000? I was at their download page and they only have
> it for XP and 2003 server. What's up with this?
I suspect that it has dependencies on the XP version of the Explorer shell.
> I am so sick of MS they just want you to upgr
s-ant like myself dont matter to MS.
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:25 AM
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
> Yeah, I know what you mean but they can get away with it to a certain
Sent: 19 October 2006 14:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: IE7 ?
Well, I suppose my point is this. Netscape builds their browser to be
supported on just about any platform, as does firefox and others. MS is the
only one I know of that builds their browser to be OS dependant. Just kinda
sucks in my opinion,
On Thursday 19 October 2006 14:13, Doug Brown wrote:
> Well, I suppose my point is this. Netscape builds their browser to be
> supported on just about any platform, as does firefox and others.
Are you confusing 'supported' with 'runs on' ?
> only one I know of that builds their browser to be OS d
now it is considered a dinasour and no more updates etc etc...Just venting I
suppose.
Doug
- Original Message -
From: "Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 7:06 AM
Subject: RE: IE7 ?
> Well
Well you can't blame them; this is standard product lifecycle process.
Windows 2000 is now in extended support before being deemed End of Life (no
patches, upgrades etc). For all intents and purposes Windows 2000 is dead.
MS do not plan on shipping an IE7 for Windows 2000 as far as I know.
-
On 10/19/06, Doug Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anybody heard if MS is going to offer a version for windows 2000? I was
> at their download page and they only have it for XP and 2003 server. What's
> up with this? I am so sick of MS they just want you to upgrade their OS
> everytime a n
81 matches
Mail list logo
