RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

It broke the CFX_Doc2HTML tag we needed for a clients site so I had to go back to 4.01 on our production server. Real pain! -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, 13 April 2000 4:21 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Is

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

In <001801bfa4ac$5acdf340$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Watts ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in a fit of unbridled passion, wrote: > > If this AOL/CF 4.5 problem is truly a problem between CF 4.5 > > and AOL and Allaire has admitted it, please post a URL so that > > I may eat my words. If I'm wrong, I'm definite

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

> If this AOL/CF 4.5 problem is truly a problem between CF 4.5 > and AOL and Allaire has admitted it, please post a URL so that > I may eat my words. If I'm wrong, I'm definitely curious as to > the technical details on this. I believe the cause of the problem might be with the use of the Page-Co

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

It's a fact, there was a known issue with the combination of WebSite, CF4.5 and AOL. I can't find any documentation on it at the moment, but there was definitely a problem which was reported several times on this and Website-talk lists, and which was confirmed by Allaire and O'Reilly. Regard

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

By the way-- If this AOL/CF 4.5 problem is truly a problem between CF 4.5 and AOL and Allaire has admitted it, please post a URL so that I may eat my words. If I'm wrong, I'm definitely curious as to the technical details on this. -- Reuben King Senior Web Consu

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

In <04c501bfa405$ebe4dee0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, WBB ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) in a fit of unbridled passion, wrote: > No Actually Reuben, unbridled passion is something you've not yet observed > from me, yet ;) > > > WBB, > > > > Your trashing of AOL rather bothers me. AOL is just an ISP like any > >

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

Original Message- > From: Yvette Ingram [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 11:32 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid > > Paul: > > You have to configure an RDS or FTP server for your localhost (username, > password

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

ColdFusion Programmer HWG TA, ColdFusion 4 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 21200397 - Original Message - From: Paul Ihrig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2000 10:43 AM Subject: RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid > > hey all having

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid (CF4.5 Is Brand New Code)

> I just want to point out something that I think is important > to note. CF4.5 is a basically a re-write from scratch. Previous > version of CF that worked on Solaris relied on a third-party > solution to emulate NT under Solaris. The reason they used the > Bristol solution, was so they could por

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

hey all having problems: I cant see any of my databasses on my localhost. uninstalled 4.5 then reinstalled 4.5.1 no luck it is still not working for my LocalHost. But it does work for my remote server. For my local host i get this error. Cold Fusion Studio 4.5.1 The connection to the server can

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid (CF4.5 Is Brand New Code)

ge- From: WBB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 8:25 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid If this was CF's first release it wouldn't bother me so much...however, Allaire had it right in versions 1.5-4.01 and in 4.51...they just flat screwed u

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

ey're able to build very specific trends by indexing the contents of the pages you are receiving, etc. etc. Big brother is watching. ;-) -Original Message- From: Reuben King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 5:46 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is 4.

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

why aren't I resisting sticking my nose into this thread? Urrrgh! > You're absolutely right...and it doesn't belong in this story because it > isn't an issue...all of our sites worked fine with AOL BEFORE AND AFTER CF > 4.5 so tell me where cross-platform browser compliancy enters the equation?

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

On 4/11/00, Jennifer penned: >So how do you determine which ISPs are large enough to justify doing this? >You say that they should do it for AOL because it's the largest modem >community, but what about the second largest and third largest and what >about non-modem communities? You are trying to s

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

Oops. Wrong button. But WBB after reading most of your post, your complete lack of logic and your inability to remember basic principles that have been mentioned repeatedly, you have convinced me that it isn't worth it to argue with you. You aren't worth the bandwidth. So congratulations, you

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

At 05:24 PM 4/11/00 -0700, you wrote: > > At 04:06 PM 4/11/00 -0700, you wrote: > > >Dear Janet (yes, that's a condescending 'Dear')...I've been married to >the > > >same woman for 27 years in two more days and I've come to realise that I > > >can't win arguments with the opposite sex once they'

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

> At 04:06 PM 4/11/00 -0700, you wrote: > >Dear Janet (yes, that's a condescending 'Dear')...I've been married to the > >same woman for 27 years in two more days and I've come to realise that I > >can't win arguments with the opposite sex once they've mad up their minds. > > Maybe there's a reas

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

Any ISP that offers Cold Fusion hosting should be included in the testing of new Cold Fusion server software on that ISP. However, all the testing in the world is never going to identify all the problems that will occur in a given environment and it is much easier for an ISP to point the fing

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

At 04:06 PM 4/11/00 -0700, you wrote: >Dear Janet (yes, that's a condescending 'Dear')...I've been married to the >same woman for 27 years in two more days and I've come to realise that I >can't win arguments with the opposite sex once they've mad up their minds. Maybe there's a reason for that.

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

Dear Janet (yes, that's a condescending 'Dear')...I've been married to the same woman for 27 years in two more days and I've come to realise that I can't win arguments with the opposite sex once they've mad up their minds. My point was that it didn't work with 20,000,00 browsers and my unsaid poin

AOL is pure evil (was RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid)

or the Internet community and for the companies that share the Net with them. They never have, they never will. They are Satan incarnate. Michael J. Sheldon Internet Applications Developer Phone: 480.699.1084 http://www.desertraven.com/ PGP Key Available on Request -----Original Message- From

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

At 01:09 PM 4/11/00 -0700, you wrote: >Hi Jennifer, > > > > At 09:02 AM 4/10/00 -0700, you wrote: > > >Hi Dick, > > > > > >We upgraded to 4.51 and it seemed to cure quite a few ills. So far no > > >damage. We had previously installed the hot fixes for CFHTTP and CFMAIL >and > > >had switched some

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

No Actually Reuben, unbridled passion is something you've not yet observed from me, yet ;) > WBB, > > Your trashing of AOL rather bothers me. AOL is just an ISP like any Gee, I'm sorry...if I responded to everything that bothered me that I read in news groups I wouldn't have a life. > other an

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

WBB, Your trashing of AOL rather bothers me. AOL is just an ISP like any other and if your application breaks when someone from AOL attempts to use it, then I would suggest the problem lies flatly on your end for your failure to support even the most basic of cross-browser compatibilities.

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

Hi Jennifer, > At 09:02 AM 4/10/00 -0700, you wrote: > >Hi Dick, > > > >We upgraded to 4.51 and it seemed to cure quite a few ills. So far no > >damage. We had previously installed the hot fixes for CFHTTP and CFMAIL and > >had switched some CFMAIL calls off to another machine so we didn't have

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

-Original Message- From: Jennifer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 1:59 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid At 09:02 AM 4/10/00 -0700, you wrote: The really funny calls were the AOL users who said "What do you mean you don't do te

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2000 10:59 AM Subject: Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid > At 09:02 AM 4/10/00 -0700, you wrote: > >Hi Dick, > > > >We upgraded to 4.51 and it seemed to cure quite a few ills. So far no > >damage. We had previously installed t

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

At 09:02 AM 4/10/00 -0700, you wrote: >Hi Dick, > >We upgraded to 4.51 and it seemed to cure quite a few ills. So far no >damage. We had previously installed the hot fixes for CFHTTP and CFMAIL and >had switched some CFMAIL calls off to another machine so we didn't have many >problems there. It no

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

4.5.1 service release is available from Allaire. - Steve -Original Message- From: Lauchlan Mackinnon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 6:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid >> The ISP who hosts many of my client's sites is

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

It was released last week and the CF 4.5 password works with it making it an upgrade. I've been using 4.5.1 for a while with much success, but results may vary. :) > > > >> The ISP who hosts many of my client's sites is considering switching > >> to 4.5.1 as the active CF platform. > > Are they

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

>> The ISP who hosts many of my client's sites is considering switching >> to 4.5.1 as the active CF platform. Are they selling 4.5.1 yet? I thought it was RC2. LM. -- Archives: http://www.eGroups.com/list/cf-talk To U

RE: Is 4.5.1 Solid

I should try to inflict our QA group here on Allaire as they NEVER LET ME GET AWAY WITH ANYTHING!!! ;-) -Original Message- From: WBB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 10, 2000 12:03 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid Hi Dick, We upgraded to 4.51 and it

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

Hi Dick, We upgraded to 4.51 and it seemed to cure quite a few ills. So far no damage. We had previously installed the hot fixes for CFHTTP and CFMAIL and had switched some CFMAIL calls off to another machine so we didn't have many problems there. It now does allow the 20,000,000 AOL users that c

Re: Is 4.5.1 Solid

- Original Message - From: "Dick Applebaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 08, 2000 11:24 PM > The ISP who hosts many of my client's sites is considering switching > to 4.5.1 as the active CF platform. > > There have been lots of threads re problems with various 4.5 version