al Message -
From: Boldacious Web Design
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on
Win2k/CMX6.1
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
MX with no problems?
===
acious Web Design
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
MX with no problems?
You wrote
rvices.com
__
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Sabir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 8:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re:(CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Hi all,
I have recently installed CFMX 6.1
You will love Oracle 10g then!
Important: This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that any review, re-tran
Yeah and I've been using CF for 8 years now. Obviously over time you learn
much more and need to adapt more.
Important: This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to legal or parliamentary privilege. I
11:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on
Win2k/CMX6.1
So far it's been fine for me - no problems I can't trace to my own
stupidity.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Boldacious Web Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesd
altogether.
Stace
_
From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 3, 2003 7:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Macromedia was enthusiastic in responding to issues when 6.1 was first
released,
and now it appears that they have gone back into t
So far it's been fine for me - no problems I can't trace to my own
stupidity.
Jim Davis
-Original Message-
From: Boldacious Web Design [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Lea
CMFX has been running really well for us since the 6.1 release. No
complaints about stability.
Brook
At 03:53 AM 11/4/2003, you wrote:
>What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
>MX with no problems?
>
> You wrote
>
> >>I suggest the user
Hi all,
I have recently installed CFMX 6.1 in a high traffic production
environment, and I can say that I haven't experienced this memory leak
problem.
I am getting quite a few deadlock errors and service too busy error,
but I suspect thats an issue with the questionable code that we
inherited.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 4:37 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Macromedia was enthusiastic in responding to issues when 6.1 was first released,
and now it appears that they have gone back into their shell. Contacting Tech
support has likewise re
Might be easier to ask how many people are having serious problems with MX.
Ken
Boldacious Web Design wrote:
> What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
> MX with no problems?
>
>
> You wrote
>
>
>
>>>I suggest the user with problem
job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Boldacious Web Design" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: [Reply To] (CF 6 reliability) from Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
| What are ot
What are other people's views on this - how many people are using
MX with no problems?
You wrote
>>I suggest the user with problems with the server product, to
uninstall >>it completely and revert to CF 5.0, until Macromedia
gets its act
>> together. Whil
satisfied with my service, my job isn't done!
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Jordahl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
|
| You need to work through Mac
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:44 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Well we have major issues with our server locking up every day. EVERY Day.
We've applied the SQL Patch, where you revert to the drivers used in 6.0.
We've seen jrun.ex
Sorry I haven't seen the whole thread...but perhaps this would help:
http://www.bpurcell.org/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=967
-Stace
_
From: Mike Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 1, 2003 1:44 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Well we h
ge-
From: Adam Churvis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 1 November 2003 6:02 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Check this out, Joe:
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/conn_pool_hotfix.h
tm
I applied it yesterday. Very straightforward.
quot;CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 1:49 PM
Subject: Re: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
> I think there is a Major Issue with CFMX 6.1 DataBase Connections. The
Connection pooling
> Engine seems to have Changed from CFMX 6.0 and most the posts point to
rev
mentioned they might look into putting a
BUG Database together, dont think this was every worked out.
Joe Eugene
- Original Message -
From: cf-talk
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 11:31 AM
Subject: RE: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Michael,
I've been running 200
Michael,
I've been running 2003 and MX6.1 for a long time now and no problems
I did a fresh install of the box and fresh install of MX... did you do
an upgrade or something? I'm just trying to identify any differences
for you.
-Novak
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kear [mailto
Are you running SQL Server? If so, then there is a known issue in the SQL
Drivers used in 6.1 try and regress back to the drivers used in CFMX U3 and
see if it makes any difference.
See if this matches your issues...
http://www.macromedia.com/support/coldfusion/ts/documents/cfmx61_sqlserver_
22 matches
Mail list logo
