/morpheus/blog
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 12:37 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Caching cfc objects in the appl
Did this get fixed by CFMX 6.1?
On Tuesday, Jul 8, 2003, at 03:20 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, Jul 7, 2003, at 06:49 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
>>> Ok, so I ran the test using the server scope and was able
>> to reproduce
>>> the problems there as well. Very odd that
-
> From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 3:20 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
>
>
> >
> > On Monday, Jul 7, 2003, at 06:49 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> > > Ok, so I ran the
>
> On Monday, Jul 7, 2003, at 06:49 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> > Ok, so I ran the test using the server scope and was able
> to reproduce
> > the problems there as well. Very odd that it didn't show up on your
> > end.
>
> Well, that's good to know (in a way). Could it perhaps... pos
On Monday, Jul 7, 2003, at 06:49 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> Ok, so I ran the test using the server scope and was able to reproduce
> the problems there as well. Very odd that it didn't show up on your
> end.
Well, that's good to know (in a way). Could it perhaps... possibly...
be some s
rfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 11:56 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
>
>
> On Friday, Jul 4, 2003, at 22:03 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> > While I agree that the load I encountered was minima
t; From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 4:40 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
>
>
> Raymond,
>
> In this code here the array is only populated in the first
> position. So it
> would onc
y.com/morpheus/blog
>Yahoo IM : morpheus
>
>"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, July 06, 2003 5:51 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > S
y, July 06, 2003 5:51 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
>
>
> That's what confuses me - if the code did create an error, it
> should do it every single time, that is, of course, assuming
> that this branch of code is running
oo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 10:46 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
>
>
On Saturday, Jul 5, 2003, at 18:04 US/Pacific, Brook Davies wrote:
> You have attempted to dereference a scalar variable of type class
> java.lang.Double as a structure with members. The error occurred on
> line 78.
I'd be interested to see the code around line 78...
Sean A Corfield -- http://www
he Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 10:30 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
> >
>
it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 10:30 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
>
>
> Hi Sean,
>
> The code (at line 78) is inside a cfloop
Hi Sean,
The code (at line 78) is inside a cfloop. Prior to the cfloop, I
initialize this local var (at the top of the method):
Then the cfloop looks like this:
Then comes line 78:
It works about 99% of the time and maybe 1 out of 1000
I have a CFC in the application scope that periodically returns this error:
You have attempted to dereference a scalar variable of type class
java.lang.Double as a structure with members. The error occurred on
line 78.
The CFC works with submitted form variables and copies them to a new
struct
On Friday, Jul 4, 2003, at 22:03 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> While I agree that the load I encountered was minimal, the odd thing is
> that I _was_ able to recreate it, but only using a load tool like MS
> WAST (is that the name) and the Apache one (can't remember it's name as
> well). As s
>
> Right, which is really very low traffic - that's why I don't
> think it's
> a load issue per se (because we didn't hit any problems under much
> higher load when we were using application scope - we changed
> to server
> scope for most things prior to deployment simply because server scop
On Friday, Jul 4, 2003, at 06:15 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
>> Can you perhaps quantify a little in terms of the level of
>> stress that you have found to trigger this "behavior"?
> In my case, the errors were occuring on cflib and my blog. I think
> cflib.org gets around 2.5k requests per d
> Can you perhaps quantify a little in terms of the level of
> stress that you have found to trigger this "behavior"?
In my case, the errors were occuring on cflib and my blog. I think
cflib.org gets around 2.5k requests per day. My blog gets a lot less.
> If it does turn out to be a "bug" and i
05:41
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
> On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 08:53 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> > It does improve performance. However, I (and others) have
> found issues
> > with CFCs that are cached and under load. (And I do
On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 21:40 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> The bugs I found were confirmed by MACR engineering, however, they were
> always stored in the application scope, so maybe that had an impact.
> Actually, since it was so easy for me to reproduce the bugs locally
> with
> a str
> On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 08:53 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> > It does improve performance. However, I (and others) have
> found issues
> > with CFCs that are cached and under load. (And I don't mean
> big honkin
> > amazon.com load, just medium level load.) Issues like:
>
> "It do
On Thursday, Jul 3, 2003, at 08:53 US/Pacific, Raymond Camden wrote:
> It does improve performance. However, I (and others) have found issues
> with CFCs that are cached and under load. (And I don't mean big honkin
> amazon.com load, just medium level load.) Issues like:
"It does improve performan
>
> 1. What's the best way to copy a cfc into the application
> scope? I've seen people do this in different ways?
> Structcopy? Duplicate?
You can't duplicate a CFC. Well, you can, but you don't end up with a
CFC. You can, however, write your own Duplicate function. However, the
easier soluti
r your response,
Rich
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 11:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Caching cfc objects in the application scope
It does improve performance. However, I (and others) have found issues
with CFCs that are c
It does improve performance. However, I (and others) have found issues
with CFCs that are cached and under load. (And I don't mean big honkin
amazon.com load, just medium level load.) Issues like:
1) Methods not working anymore - in other words, you call foo() and the
CFC forgets it has foo() (Thi
26 matches
Mail list logo
