Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-26 Thread Ian Buzer
Google does treat SES URLs slightly differently in that it will spider pages at a significantly slower rate if it thinks the pages are dynamic. It is designed that way so that it doesn't bring the site down by over enthusiastic spidering. I redeveloped an existing application into fusebox, so

Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-26 Thread Bert Dawson
: 25 April 2005 13:34 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary? I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from a table of vanity URLs. It evaluates the last value of a list separated by / and searches the database for the url... Simple enough

Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread Al Everett
For those of you taking a lot of time getting your dynamic site URLs to look like static ones, this article may be of interest to you: http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/4/emw232456.htm (I am in no way affiliated with the site. It just happened to come up in a Google Alert and covers a

RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread Kerry
Subject: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary? For those of you taking a lot of time getting your dynamic site URLs to look like static ones, this article may be of interest to you: http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/4/emw232456.htm (I am in no way affiliated with the site. It just

RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread Jeff Garza
, April 25, 2005 6:18 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary? Yeah, I think search engines are happier about querystrings now, but: We have customers who put their URLs in printed marketing materials, so there is no way we are going to have users typing in: /index.cfm

RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread kola.oyedeji
Subject: RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary? I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from a table of vanity URLs. It evaluates the last value of a list separated by / and searches the database for the url... Simple enough for me. HTH, Jeff -Original

Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread Kay Smoljak
On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from a table of vanity URLs. It evaluates the last value of a list separated by / and searches the database for the url... You realise that when a search engine hits a 404 it turns around

RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread James Smith
Couldn't you combine it with a cfheader statuscode=200 or something though? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2005 14:44 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary? Jeff, While that works, doesn't

RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread kola.oyedeji
My point exactly ;-) ~k -Original Message- From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 April 2005 13:44 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary? On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use a custom 404 handler that does

Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread Keith Gaughan
Al Everett wrote: For those of you taking a lot of time getting your dynamic site URLs to look like static ones, this article may be of interest to you: http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/4/emw232456.htm (I am in no way affiliated with the site. It just happened to come up in a

RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread sean farrow
I use a similar setup to Jeff purely for search engine optimisation. You can set the HTTP status code to 200 and googlebot does index. Another point is that while google may index sites with complex URL's this in itself does not constitute search engine optimisation but rather is just a

Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread Jeff Garza
Message - From: Kay Smoljak [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:44 AM Subject: Re: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary? On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from

RE: Are search engine safe URLs really necessary?

2005-04-25 Thread Phillip B. Holmes
This is an excellent product for SEF URLS: http://helicontech.com/linkfreeze/ Best part about it is that you do not have to modify your existing url key pair schema. Just my 2 cents. Phil --- [This E-mail has been scanned for viruses.]

Re: search engine safe URLs

2004-09-17 Thread Nathan Wells
Just finished my article. Enjoy http://www.fusionauthority.com/Article1.cfm/ArticleID=4226 Great article Michael.I tried to implement the code you posted, and found one thing people should be aware of. The use of a colon in a URL may not be allowed if you're using Microsoft IIS.It seems that

Re: search engine safe URLs

2004-07-08 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Just finished my article. Enjoy http://www.fusionauthority.com/Article1.cfm/ArticleID=4226 [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

RE: search engine safe URLs

2004-07-07 Thread Stephen Milligan
? http://cfeclipse.tigris.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Dinowitz Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 9:44 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: search engine safe URLs I have. When I redid the HoF site in SES urls, the amount of search agents

RE: search engine safe URLs

2004-07-07 Thread dave
thats why u stick your dynamic content in your meta tags been that way 4 yrs now [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

RE: search engine safe URLs

2004-07-07 Thread Raymond Camden
http://www.mysite.com/index.cfm?page=productSummarycatID=12 however, most search engines will only index the index.cfm page sine the remainder of the url is dynamic. This seems to be a commonly voiced fear but searching on various search engines simply doesn't seem to back this

search engine safe URLs

2004-07-06 Thread Chris Alvarado
Hello all, I have an app that calls pages dynamically via switching statements and url variables similar to early fusebox applications. Something like: http://www.mysite.com/index.cfm?page=productSummarycatID=12 however, most search engines will only index the index.cfm page sine the remainder

Re: search engine safe URLs

2004-07-06 Thread Robert Munn
however, most search engines will only index the index.cfm page sine the remainder of the url is dynamic. I wonder how much that is still true. Admittedly, I do mostly intranet-based work, but I recently built a site for my wife's real estate business and had no problems with URLs for a Fusebox

Re: search engine safe URLs

2004-07-06 Thread Sean Corfield
http://www.mysite.com/index.cfm?page=productSummarycatID=12 however, most search engines will only index the index.cfm page sine the remainder of the url is dynamic. This seems to be a commonly voiced fear but searching on various search engines simply doesn't seem to back this up and I

Re: search engine safe URLs

2004-07-06 Thread simeon
It doesnt take much searching on google or yahoo to see that dynamic pages DO get indexed. I read somewhere recently that its not an issue of dynamic pages being indexed, however, the issue is that the search engines will not spider pages from a dynamic url. This is not something that i have

Re: search engine safe URLs

2004-07-06 Thread Michael Dinowitz
, 06 Jul 2004 22:36:24 -0700 Subject: Re: search engine safe URLs To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] It doesnt take much searching on google or yahoo to see that dynamic pages DO get indexed. I read somewhere recently that its not an issue of dynamic pages being indexed, however, the issue

search engine safe urls question

2003-10-03 Thread Ketan Patel
Has anybody tried this FriendlyURL Servlet. http://www.spike.org.uk/go/friendly-urls If yes please email me some sites whicha re using that. Ketan Patel G3 Technology Group, LLC http://www.instantposition.com [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User

Re: search engine safe urls question

2003-10-03 Thread Stephen Moretti
www.ukcfug.org Spike does good stuff. Stephen Ketan Patel wrote: Has anybody tried this FriendlyURL Servlet. http://www.spike.org.uk/go/friendly-urls If yes please email me some sites whicha re using that. Ketan Patel G3 Technology Group, LLC http://www.instantposition.com [Todays

Re:RE: Search engine safe urls

2003-08-04 Thread jlangevin
reap, but by the seeds you plant. --Robert Louis Stevenson Reply Separator Subject:RE: Search engine safe urls Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 8/3/2003 10:50 PM I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that works so I'm going to ask

RE: Search engine safe urls

2003-08-03 Thread Dave Watts
I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that works so I'm going to ask here. In the release notes for the updater it says as one of the features fixed: Search engine safe URLs of the form *.cfm/* did not work properly, so a URL such as http:/server/test.cfm/alpha/beta would

Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz
I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that works so I'm going to ask here. In the release notes for the updater it says as one of the features fixed: Search engine safe URLs of the form *.cfm/* did not work properly, so a URL such as http:/server/test.cfm/alpha/beta would not execute

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Matt Robertson
Michael, Just a shot in the dark: is your web server software intercepting the urls and pumping out 404's before CF can get hold of them? -- --- Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com

RE: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Heald, Tim
safe urls I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that works so I'm going to ask here. In the release notes for the updater it says as one of the features fixed: Search engine safe URLs of the form *.cfm/* did not work properly, so a URL such as http:/server/test.cfm/alpha/beta would

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Johan Steenkamp
: Search engine safe urls I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that works so I'm going to ask here. In the release notes for the updater it says as one of the features fixed: Search engine safe URLs of the form *.cfm/* did not work properly, so a URL such as http:/server/test.cfm

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Pablo Varando
Michael, check this tutorial out: http://tutorial90.easycfm.com/ Pablo - Original Message - From: Heald, Tim [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:41 PM Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls The two main things I have heard about this are: 1

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz
28, 2003 3:41 PM Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls The two main things I have heard about this are: 1. Make sure to have a base tag in you head 2. Uncheck the check for files existence (or something like that) in Internet Services Manager Home Directory Configuration So far

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz
Nope. A 500: http://lotauctions.com/index.cfm/name=a The server encountered an error and was unable to complete your request. Message: ISAPI DLL D:\CFusionMX\runtime\lib\wsconfig\2\jrun.isa returned error status for this request. Basically, the url is being passed to the CF engine and it has no

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Matt Robertson
I have something that works here for me in CFMX with the latest updater. Its a modification of Ben Forta's cf_FakeURL, which threw a 500 when I just tried it a second ago. So did Pablo Varando's code. The problem is cgi.path_info is coming back as the same value as what I'd expect to see

RE: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Barney Boisvert
-Original Message- From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls I have something that works here for me in CFMX with the latest updater. Its a modification of Ben Forta's cf_FakeURL, which

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz
So does this code work for you? I'm running on the internal web server, but as I said its throwing the identical error you reported. Nope. I've used my original code as well as new tests and the core problem is that the url is not being recognized as containing a valid template by CFMX. It

RE: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Mosh Teitelbaum
To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls Nope. A 500: http://lotauctions.com/index.cfm/name=a The server encountered an error and was unable to complete your request. Message: ISAPI DLL D:\CFusionMX\runtime\lib\wsconfig\2\jrun.isa returned error status for this request. Basically

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz
, July 28, 2003 4:55 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls Nope. A 500: http://lotauctions.com/index.cfm/name=a The server encountered an error and was unable to complete your request. Message: ISAPI DLL D:\CFusionMX\runtime\lib\wsconfig\2\jrun.isa returned error

RE: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Mark Johnson
To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls I think your missing the point and origin of SES urls. Basically, it goes back to 96 or 97 and has to do with a small 'feature' where anything AFTER the file name would be pumped into the CGI.path_info. It didn't matter if it had question marks, equal

Re: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Michael Dinowitz
: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:08 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls I think your missing the point and origin of SES urls. Basically, it goes back to 96 or 97 and has to do with a small 'feature' where anything AFTER the file name would be pumped into the CGI.path_info

RE: Search engine safe urls

2003-07-28 Thread Mark Johnson
://somedomain.com/test.html/name/value Mark -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:43 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls Did you do something to IIS or to CFMX? Are you on a single site machine or multi-homed? I'm

FW: Search engine safe urls in CFMX

2003-06-30 Thread Jerry Staple
Hi Can anyone tell me how you turn urls into search engine safe urls in Coldfusion Mx i.e TURN index.cfm?user=Joe Bloggsbgcolor=bluecounty=2 INTO index.cfm/user=Joe Bloggs/bgcolor=blue/county=2 etc etc Thanks in Advance Jerry Staple Web Application Developer Certified

RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX

2003-06-30 Thread Taco Fleur
descriptionfile creates url variables from search engine safe urls/description /fileInfo --- cfswitch expression=#thisTag.executionMode# cfcase value=start cfloop list=#caller.cgi.path_info# index=item delimiters

RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX

2003-06-30 Thread Hugo Ahlenius
Message- | From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 13:15 | To: CF-Talk | Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX | | | You could form al your links like index.cfm/var=foo | | And use the custom tag I wrote, remove the cf_error tag

RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX

2003-06-30 Thread Taco Fleur
anything else, so a good spot for it would be in the application.cfm file. Taco Fleur -Original Message- From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 30 June 2003 9:15 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX You could form al your links like index.cfm/var=foo

RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX

2003-06-30 Thread Taco Fleur
Interesting.. -Original Message- From: Hugo Ahlenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 30 June 2003 9:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX Taco, Your documentation/header seems invalid, if it is supposed to be XML: you forgot to close the createDate tag