http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=studio+mx
--
Exciteworks, Inc
Expert Hosting for less!
*Ask for a free 30 day trial!*
http://exciteworks.com
Plans starting at -$12.95- including MS SQL Server!
Mickael wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>Is there anyone on this list can point me to a place where
Hi All,
Is there anyone on this list can point me to a place where I can buy a Boxed version
of Studio MX with Flash Pro cheaper than I can from the Macromedia site? I am in
Toronto Canada
Sorry for being OT
Mike
~|
The
> Can any tell me what the latest version numbers of Studio MX
> , Dreamweaver MX and Flash MX are.
>
> I need to put into to get a upgrade to our installed Studio
> MX and our software ordering dept, is asking me for specific
> version numbers.
They are all version 7. Howe
MX is 6.x, MX2004 is 7.x. The x is 0 or 1, depending on the updaters you've
applied.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Ciliotta, Mario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 1:35 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Question about Studio MX
Hi,
Can any tell me what the latest version numbers of Studio MX , Dreamweaver MX
and Flash MX are.
I need to put into to get a upgrade to our installed Studio MX and our
software ordering dept, is asking me for specific version numbers.
Thanks
Mario
[Todays Threads]
[This Message
The DW updater is really worth, the team fixed literally many hundreds of
bugs.
I felt DW 2004 was pushed out of the door too early, but the update send a
strong message to the userbase about how much the DW's team is committed to
deliver a quality product
Of course, if you don't like DW before,
Hot off the press: the Updater for Dreamweaver MX 2004 is now available.
With the release of the Dreamweaver Updater, all Macromedia Studio MX 2004
products have been optimized for better quality and performance.
New Studio MX 2004 purchases will include all of the updated products.
Existing
eCost ( www.ecost.com ) is usually much cheaper
than MM.
--
Michael Wolfe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
From: Burns, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 12:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Studio MX 2004 with Flash Professional
Does anyone know where to get Studio MX
You might want to do a search at any of the comparison shopping sites.
Shopping.com and CNet come to mind.
Christian
-Original Message-
From: Burns, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 January 2004 15:19
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Studio MX 2004 with Flash Professional
Does anyone know
3:19 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Studio MX 2004 with Flash Professional
Does anyone know where to get Studio MX 2004 w/ Flash Professional for
less than on Macromedia's site? I'm looking to purchase it and was
curious if anyone had any leads on a cheaper source. Thanks!
John Burns
__
Does anyone know where to get Studio MX 2004 w/ Flash Professional for
less than on Macromedia's site? I'm looking to purchase it and was
curious if anyone had any leads on a cheaper source. Thanks!
John Burns
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscrib
Sam
--
Blog: http://www.rewindlife.com
Chart: http://www.blinex.com/products/charting
--
-Original Message-
From: Candace Cottrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 11:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Studio MX
So, I am wondering if I am the only one in this boat...
We bought 2 years of upgrade protection on Studio MX.
Flash MX 2004 Pro comes out and it's not included in upgrade
protection.
Ok, I can understand that. We need to buy upgrades to Pro.
BUT... according to CDW, we LOSE the
If you bought Macromedia Studio MX between July 26, 2003 and 60 days after the first
ship date of Macromedia Studio MX 2004, you should be eligible for a free upgrade to
Macromedia Studio MX 2004.
http://www.macromedia.com/software/studio/productinfo/faq/#item-16
http://www.macromedia.com
Wednesday, September 10, 2003 3:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Upgrade of purchase of Studio MX
Hi all,
Today we purchased Studio MX. When we purchased it we were told that MX
2004 wasn't available yet. Is there a window that we would get and
upgrade to 2004?
I would be really ticked
Never mind. Forget the whole question.
When we ordered this morning we were told 2004 wasn't available. When we
received the electronic confirmation it lists the software as Studio MX
version 2004.
Thanks though.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: DURETTE, STEVEN J (AIT)
Hi all,
Today we purchased Studio MX. When we purchased it we were told that MX
2004 wasn't available yet. Is there a window that we would get and upgrade
to 2004?
I would be really ticked if we tried to purchase MX2004 told we couldn't
have it yet and then have to turn around and
I saw someone telling you to try again. If that does not work, maybe
restart and try to install. If that doesn't work, you can contact me and I
can try to help out. Sorry you are having an issue.
_
Matt Brown
ECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 25, 2002 12:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Studio MX install issues - help on upgrade
Heya, folks,
OK, so wanting to support my favorite software company, I purchased
Studio
MX (I'll admit, I use CF Studio for everything, but I figured I might as
well get the whole
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Studio MX install issues - help on upgrade
Heya, folks,
OK, so wanting to support my favorite software company, I purchased
Studio
MX (I'll admit, I use CF Studio for everything, but I figured I might as
well get the whole bundle and finally sit down and learn how to c
Heya, folks,
OK, so wanting to support my favorite software company, I purchased Studio
MX (I'll admit, I use CF Studio for everything, but I figured I might as
well get the whole bundle and finally sit down and learn how to create Flash
goodness). According to the upgrade chart, since I ha
hanged names, but for anyone worrying, we are actually guardedly
optimistic with Studio MX. I think we are pretty happy with the product and
the sales. Not to say we wouldn't like to sell more or make the products
even better, but things are certainly doing as well or better t
Specialists
-Original Message-
From: Tilbrook, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: Macromedia Studio MX
MM (Macromedia - not Mere Male) have apparently sold more than 250,000
copies of Studio MX since its June introduction
il: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work: 206.575.1717
Cell: 206.351.3948
-Original Message-
From: Tilbrook, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2002 9:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: SOT: Macromedia Studio MX
MM (Macromedia - not Mere Male) have apparently sold more than 250,000
copies
MM (Macromedia - not Mere Male) have apparently sold more than 250,000
copies of Studio MX since its June introduction - making it MM's most
popular product yet. Pretty good result really. And if you are considering
upgrading to MX it's available for US$799 until December 31 (US$100 ch
Jeffry Houser wrote:
> >Note: never, ever compare boolean expressions to 0 or 1 (or false /
> >true), especially to 1 (true). is not always equivalent to
> > - precisely because people can be lazy about mixing
> >numbers with real booleans.
>
> I am completely confused by this.
> What should
Watts [mailto:dwatts@;figleaf.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2002 6:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Studio MX
> > Pedantry can be dangerous. While Len returns an
> > integer, CF treats non-zero integer values as
> > boolean "true" values when they're used in boolean
> &g
I changed the subject because we're way off track from Studio MX (and
have been for several posts).
On Sunday, Nov 10, 2002, at 03:30 US/Pacific, Jeffry Houser wrote:
> At 03:41 PM 11/9/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>> Note: never, ever compare boolean expressions to 0 or 1 (or f
At 03:41 PM 11/9/2002 -0800, you wrote:
>Note: never, ever compare boolean expressions to 0 or 1 (or false /
>true), especially to 1 (true). is not always equivalent to
> - precisely because people can be lazy about mixing
>numbers with real booleans.
I am completely confused by this.
What s
> > Pedantry can be dangerous. While Len returns an
> > integer, CF treats non-zero integer values as
> > boolean "true" values when they're used in boolean
> > expressions.
>
> Yes, so does C and C++ but that doesn't make it good
> style, IMO.
No, but it doesn't make it "bad" style, either. O
On Saturday, Nov 9, 2002, at 15:10 US/Pacific, Dave Watts wrote:
> Pedantry can be dangerous. While Len returns an integer, CF treats
> non-zero
> integer values as boolean "true" values when they're used in boolean
> expressions.
Yes, so does C and C++ but that doesn't make it good style, IMO.
> So I'm just left looking for a claification on this
> part of my question:
>
> "I assume there is a demo/single-license version of MX
> server I can download. Would my best option be to just
> stick with Studio5 and download the MX server?"
Yes, I think so. I'd recommend that you try out Dre
>
> >
> > And, really, I would use this:
> >
> >
> >
>
> should be
>
>
>
> BECAUSE Len() DOES NOT RETURN A BOOLEAN!
>
>
Pedantry can be dangerous. While Len returns an integer, CF treats non-zero
integer values as boolean "true" values when they're used in boolean
expressions.
Now, yo
> There are THREE (3) core reasons that people whom have been in use of
> ColdFusion Studio have as a problem with Dreamweaver MX:
>
> 1) It is SLOOW. Slow, as in molasses-slow.
Very true.
Personally I don't care too much since I always used DW side by side with a
text editor (HomeSite or wh
ens, Howard [mailto:HOwens@;insidevc.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:44 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Studio MX
>
>
> Thanks for the input.
>
> So far, you all got me leaning toward sticking with Studio5.
> It would be fun to have the integrated tools of StudioMX, bu
t: Thursday, November 07, 2002 12:49 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Studio MX
>
>
> I assume there is a demo/single-license version of MX server I can
> download.
> Would my best option be to just stick with Studio5 and download the MX
> server? If I do this, is there
Bryan Stevenson wrote:
> Ergwrite less efficient code for the sake of possible future
> developers!!!???
>
> How about keeping the more efficient code and commenting it so those future
> developers will understand it ;-)
For a little fun I wrote some code to test the performance difference
be
Original Message -
From: "Rick Root" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: Studio MX
> Kreig Zimmerman wrote:
> > No. Len() is evaluated as a Boolean because in CF, True/False, Yes/No,
rk A. Kruger - CFG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:12 AM
Subject: RE: Studio MX
> Robert,
>
> Pound signs are used to "output" variables where you want them "display"
or
> (in some c
19 N., Ste. C
Clearwater, FL 33761
www.trxi.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Moretti [mailto:stephen@;cfmaster.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:19 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Studio MX
>
>
>
> >
> > And, really, I would use
Kreig Zimmerman wrote:
> No. Len() is evaluated as a Boolean because in CF, True/False, Yes/No,
> and 1(+)/0 are all evaluated as Boolean pairs.
>
> Trust me. I use this everywhere in my own code.
I used to do this a lot too, but I found that spelling it out makes the
code more legible to oth
: Studio MX
>
> And, really, I would use this:
>
>
>
should be
BECAUSE Len() DOES NOT RETURN A BOOLEAN!
I'll go away now..
Stephen
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?fo
Rick,
Yes - and it also adds a big "ick" factor to your code.
-mk
-Original Message-
From: Rick Root [mailto:rroot@;wakeinternet.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Studio MX
Mark A. Kruger - CFG wrote:
> CF code very poor. It actualll
m: Robert Polickoski [mailto:rpolickoski@;isrd.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Studio MX
I am fairly new to CFML (3 months). You mentioned the "rookie use
of pound signs." How else do you identify variables?
Robert J. Polickoski
Senior Programm
Nah... I think you are giving him too much credit .
-Original Message-
From: Mike Townend [mailto:mike@;cfnews.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Studio MX
I think stephen was thinking more future wise Len() actually returns
an Integer (or maybe
: Friday, November 8, 2002 16:29
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Studio MX
No. Len() is evaluated as a Boolean because in CF, True/False, Yes/No,
and 1(+)/0 are all evaluated as Boolean pairs.
Trust me. I use this everywhere in my own code.
Stephen Moretti wrote:
>
>
>
>>And, really, I
http://vvmx.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: Kreig Zimmerman [mailto:kkz@;foureyes.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:14 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Studio MX
OK.
Enough of the sermonizing as to why people are using this that and the
other; why coders are coders and designers are desig
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: Studio MX
>
> And, really, I would use this:
>
>
>
should be
BECAUSE Len() DOES NOT R
No. Len() is evaluated as a Boolean because in CF, True/False, Yes/No,
and 1(+)/0 are all evaluated as Boolean pairs.
Trust me. I use this everywhere in my own code.
Stephen Moretti wrote:
>
>
>
>>And, really, I would use this:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>should be
>
>
>
>BECAUSE Len() DOES NOT
It absolutely causes better performance. As of CFMX, that is.
The underlying Java translation is much quicker if it is not doing an
absolute string comparison.
Lofback, Chris wrote:
>drop the pound signs for clarity and--I think--better
>performance.
>
>
>
--
Kreig Zimmerman : Sr. Web Prog
>
> And, really, I would use this:
>
>
>
should be
BECAUSE Len() DOES NOT RETURN A BOOLEAN!
I'll go away now..
Stephen
~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription:
http://www
OK.
Enough of the sermonizing as to why people are using this that and the
other; why coders are coders and designers are designers and the twain
shall never meet; and all sort of idiotic posturing.
There are THREE (3) core reasons that people whom have been in use of
ColdFusion Studio have as
t made me wonder if
> CF server
> >folks were involved in the creation of the CF wizards at all.
> >
> >-mk
> >
> >P.S. - Studio 5 rocks.
> >
> >
> >
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Rick Root [mailto:rroot@;wakeinternet.com]
Developer
TRX Integration
28051 US 19 N., Ste. C
Clearwater, FL 33761
www.trxi.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Polickoski [mailto:rpolickoski@;isrd.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:42 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Studio MX
>
>
> I am fair
;Rick Root" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 8:59 AM
Subject: Re: Studio MX
| David Adams wrote:
| > Everyone I know is still using studio and if in a pinch Homesite MX. In
| > our lives we need more simplicity no
oo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Polickoski [mailto:rpolickoski@;isrd.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 10:42 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Studio MX
>
>
> I am fairly new
What he is talking about is inside, lets say the cfif tag, cf variables
do not need pound signs around them.
Clint
-Original Message-
From: Robert Polickoski [mailto:rpolickoski@;isrd.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Studio MX
I am fairly new to
Mark A. Kruger - CFG wrote:
> CF code very poor. It actuallly did this on the validation:
>
>
> validate blah
>
>
> Notice the rookie use of the pound signs. It made me wonder if CF server
> folks were involved in the creation of the CF wizards at all.
Hahahahha... isn't that o
he rookie use of the pound signs. It made me wonder if
CF server
>folks were involved in the creation of the CF wizards at all.
>
>-mk
>
>P.S. - Studio 5 rocks.
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Rick Root [mailto:rroot@;wakeinternet.com]
>Sent: Friday, Nove
ilto:rroot@;wakeinternet.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Studio MX
David Adams wrote:
> Everyone I know is still using studio and if in a pinch Homesite MX. In
> our lives we need more simplicity not complexity.
I guess I missed the rest of this thread b
November 2002 2:00 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Studio MX
David Adams wrote:
> Everyone I know is still using studio and if in a pinch Homesite MX. In
> our lives we need more simplicity not complexity.
I guess I missed the rest of this thread but I thought I'd chime in with
my opinion.
I d
Howard,
I forced myself to switch to Studio MX from Cold Fusion Studio 5 when it
was released. Months later, and a jar full of complaints, I can honestly
say that Dreamweaver MX does not meet the high standards that Studio 5
set.
Dreamweaver is great for designers and n00bs. Like Forta said at
David Adams wrote:
> Everyone I know is still using studio and if in a pinch Homesite MX. In
> our lives we need more simplicity not complexity.
I guess I missed the rest of this thread but I thought I'd chime in with
my opinion.
I don't like Dreamweaver MX. We have a Site License for it here
ell.
Dave Adams
CFUG Ottawa
-Original Message-
From: Robertson-Ravo, Neil (REC)
[mailto:Neil.Robertson-Ravo@;csd.reedexpo.com]
Sent: November 8, 2002 5:37 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Studio MX
I certainly wouldnt say integrated... I would say 'replaced' as DWMX
-Original Mess
I certainly wouldnt say integrated... I would say 'replaced' as DWMX
-Original Message-
From: Jason Lees (National Express)
[mailto:Jason.Lees@;NationalExpress.Co.uk]
Sent: 08 November 2002 08:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Studio MX
My understanding is that there is no longer a
Sent: 08 November 2002 08:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Studio MX
My understanding is that there is no longer a CF Studio, its now fully
integrated with Dreamweaver MX.
Jason Lees
Systems Developer
National Express Coaches Ltd.
-Original Message-
From: Owens, Howard [mailto:HOwens@;insidev
: Studio MX
I'm trying to decide the best upgrade path ...
Some time in the next year, we'll upgrade our servers to MX, so I will want
to upgrade my development environment, too.
Currently, I have Studio5 and the dev version of the server for 5.0. I also
have UltraDev, but rarely use it. I
all of my coding (and very little
design) in Studio. That's the way I like it.
Should I upgrade to Studio MX? Will I like it if I love the current version
of Studio, or does the "homesite" aspect of Studio disappear? If it does,
but I get MX anyway, can I retain the install of St
For software, I usually start with:
www.bigclearance.com
www.buycheapsoftware.com
Don't know what they sell studio for.
Regards,
Bob Haroche
O n P o i n t S o l u t i o n s
www.OnPointSolutions.com
__
Get the mailserver that
-
From: "Double Down" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2002 2:37 PM
Subject: Studio MX
> Does anyone know of a good place th
today at www.macromedia.com/go/devcon2002
-Original Message-
From: Double Down
To: CF-Talk
Sent: 9/12/2002 11:37 AM
Subject: Studio MX
Does anyone know of a good place that has studio MX for a good price?
TIA
DDINC
Does anyone know of a good place that has studio MX for a good price?
TIA
DDINC
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http
, but they don't seem to budge on it). I have searched
online and keep running into dead ends.
What problems would we have if this person used CF Studio MX with the CF
Enterprise 5.0 (obviously any newer feature won't work, but would they be
compatible at all)?
Does anyone know where
I've been using fireworks since 4.0. I love it and have never gone back to
the resource hogging photoshop.
- Original Message -
From: "Bill Wheatley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:54 P
oper
Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer
EDIETS.COM
954.360.9022 X159
ICQ 417645
- Original Message -
From: "Dave Hannum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 1:43 PM
Subject: Re: homes
bject: Re: Studio MX and Homesite - Where is Homesite?
You should be able to in DWMX, just hit cntrl-f and take a look at your
options there.
~Todd
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Matthew R. Small wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just bought MX Studio - where is Homesite? I need to do a
> site-wide fi
On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 07:42 , Matthew R. Small wrote:
> I just bought MX Studio - where is Homesite? I need to do a
> site-wide find and replace. Can I do it in DWMX?
Yes, DWMX will do site-wide find and replace.
Note that Dreamweaver MX - part of the Studio MX bundle - co
look in the homesite+ directory on the studio MX cd ;)
i had the same issues.
Now you're going to have to download the VTM & HELP files from the web
becuase homesite+ doesnt come with CF HELP *go figure*
if you need those links i can try to dig them up if vern doesnt have them
handy
You should be able to in DWMX, just hit cntrl-f and take a look at your
options there.
~Todd
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Matthew R. Small wrote:
> Hi all,
> I just bought MX Studio - where is Homesite? I need to do a
> site-wide find and replace. Can I do it in DWMX?
>
> Matthew Small
> IT Su
Hi all,
I just bought MX Studio - where is Homesite? I need to do a
site-wide find and replace. Can I do it in DWMX?
Matthew Small
IT Supervisor
Showstopper National Dance Competitions
3660 Old Kings Hwy
Murrells Inlet, SC 29576
843-357-1847
_
Howdy,
I have a full commercial version of CF MX Professional edition, SKU
CPD060D000, that I would like to sell or swap for a copy of
Macromedia Studio MX, SKU WSW060D000 (for Windows). The CF MX box is
still shrinkwrapped/unopened. If anyone wants to do a swap, the
Studio MX box
> With the MX suite of applications, why is it that everything else,
> Dreamweaver MX, Flash MX go into the macromedia folder on the startup
> menu. But CFMX has to have its own folder? Nit picking, yes... But it
> would have made better sense to keep everything together, and not like
> this!
Pro
together, and not like
this!
-Original Message-
From: Peter Tilbrook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 3 June 2002 2:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
How long before we can order the files on CD I wonder
How long before we can order the files on CD I wonder :)
-Original Message-
From: Shawn Grover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 30 May 2002 1:15 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
And then CFTalk goes deathly quiet as everyone rushes off to
ursday, May 30, 2002 9:09 PM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
> >oi do you say this because you've tried it?!! It's necessary to ask
these
> >questions since they won't let us see it!!
>
> I had it when I was in the Kojak beta program
> From: Andrew Tyrone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday,
> -Original Message-
> From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 4:33 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
>
>
> No, sorry, I didn't make it clear.
>
> HomeSite+ is a HomeSite5 bas
alk
> Subject: Re: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
>
>
> > HomeSite+ is HomeSite5 plus the CF VTMs & help/reference
> for CF stuff. So,
> if you want to see in general what HomeSite+ will look like,
> take a look at
> the HomeSite5 trial.
>
> Does
Broadvision.
We are in the process of transitioning to our own servers.
mike chambers
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Ken Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:19 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX / Studio M
>oi do you say this because you've tried it?!! It's necessary to ask these
>questions since they won't let us see it!!
I had it when I was in the Kojak beta program and was able to download
Homesite+ separately. I can tell you that there is virtually no difference
between CF Studio and Homesit
> HomeSite+ is HomeSite5 plus the CF VTMs & help/reference for CF stuff.
> So, if you want to see in general what HomeSite+ will look like, take
> a look at the HomeSite5 trial.
Did the release version change from what was available with the
DreamweaverMX beta? If not, then Homesite+ is actuall
oi Owen!!
yeap,I had it installed during the dwmx beta, and it's identical to
CFStudio 5.0 I [[assume]] there are only minor bug fixes, but there is nothing
different in the appearance of it. Database tabsqlquery builder.
and still the bug when you create a folder via rds
> oi Owen!!
>
> homesite+ is basically your CFStudio 5.1 etc etc
oi do you say this because you've tried it?!! It's necessary to ask these
questions since they won't let us see it!!
-- Owen
> OL> Does that mean that HomeSite+ lacks advanced tools like the Databases
> OL> resource windo
I think you should check out Dreamweaver MX... I am a die hard CF Studio
Fan and I got to tell you Dreamweaver MX is my new development tool of
choice...
At 02:40 PM 5/30/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>oi Owen!!
>
>homesite+ is basically your CFStudio 5.1 etc etc
>
>
>--
>Critz
>Certified Adv. C
> HomeSite+ is HomeSite5 plus the CF VTMs & help/reference for CF stuff. So,
if you want to see in general what HomeSite+ will look like, take a look at
the HomeSite5 trial.
Does that mean that HomeSite+ lacks advanced tools like the Databases
resource window, debugging tools, Query Builder, etc?
It's JSP pages.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
> I think that's just high traff
HomeSite+ is not available as a trial, it only comes with the purchase of DWMX Win (or
Studio MX Win).
HomeSite+ is HomeSite5 plus the CF VTMs & help/reference for CF stuff. So, if you want
to see in general what HomeSite+ will look like, take a look at the HomeSite5 trial.
Vernon V
nt: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:10 PM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
> OK, here's the info on DWMX & HS+:
>
> HomeSite+ comes with all purchases of Dreamweaver MX for Windows.
>
> It's on the CD, and if you buy online via download, it'
> I think that's just high traffic, some requests get
> through, others don't.
Hmm, that's comforting. Can you reassure us that this is NOT running CFMX?
:)
Ken
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: ColdFusion MX / Studio MX now available!
I think that's just high traffic, some requests get through, others don't.
I'll double check on that for you though.
-
1 - 100 of 124 matches
Mail list logo
