-Original Message-
> > From: Jeff Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 25 April 2005 13:34
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: RE: Are "search engine safe" URLs really necessary?
> >
> > I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup
Google does treat SES URLs slightly differently in that it will spider pages at
a significantly slower rate if it thinks the pages are dynamic. It is designed
that way so that it doesn't bring the site down by over enthusiastic spidering.
I redeveloped an existing application into fusebox, so ev
This is an excellent product for SEF URLS:
http://helicontech.com/linkfreeze/
Best part about it is that you do not have to modify your existing url key
pair schema.
Just my 2 cents.
Phil
---
[This E-mail has been scanned for viruses.]
~~~
ginal Message -
From: "Kay Smoljak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:44 AM
Subject: Re: Are "search engine safe" URLs really necessary?
> On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I use a custom
I use a similar setup to Jeff purely for search engine optimisation. You can
set the HTTP status code to 200 and googlebot does index.
Another point is that while google may index sites with complex URL's this in
itself does not constitute search engine optimisation but rather is just a
compone
Al Everett wrote:
> For those of you taking a lot of time getting your dynamic site URLs
> to look like static ones, this article may be of interest to you:
>
> http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/4/emw232456.htm
>
> (I am in no way affiliated with the site. It just happened to come up
> in
My point exactly ;-)
~k
> -Original Message-
> From: Kay Smoljak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 April 2005 13:44
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Are "search engine safe" URLs really necessary?
>
> On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Couldn't you combine it with a or something
though?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 April 2005 14:44
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Are "search engine safe" URLs really necessary?
>
> Jeff,
&g
On 4/25/05, Jeff Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from a table of
> vanity URLs. It evaluates the last value of a list separated by "/" and
> searches the database for the url...
You realise that when a search engine hits a 404 it turns aro
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Are "search engine safe" URLs really necessary?
>
> I use a custom 404 handler that does a database lookup from a table of
> vanity URLs. It evaluates the last value of a list separated by "/" and
> searches the database for the u
nt: Monday, April 25, 2005 6:18 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Are "search engine safe" URLs really necessary?
Yeah, I think search engines are happier about querystrings now, but:
We have customers who put their URLs in printed marketing materials, so
there is no way we are going to
Subject: Are "search engine safe" URLs really necessary?
For those of you taking a lot of time getting your dynamic site URLs
to look like static ones, this article may be of interest to you:
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/4/emw232456.htm
(I am in no way affiliated with th
For those of you taking a lot of time getting your dynamic site URLs
to look like static ones, this article may be of interest to you:
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2005/4/emw232456.htm
(I am in no way affiliated with the site. It just happened to come up
in a Google Alert and covers a topic
>Just finished my article. Enjoy
>http://www.fusionauthority.com/Article1.cfm/ArticleID=4226
Great article Michael. I tried to implement the code you posted, and found one thing people should be aware of. The use of a colon in a URL may not be allowed if you're using Microsoft IIS. It seems that
Just finished my article. Enjoy
http://www.fusionauthority.com/Article1.cfm/ArticleID=4226
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
>
> > http://www.mysite.com/index.cfm?page=productSummary&catID=12
> >
> > however, most search engines will only index the index.cfm
> page sine
> > the remainder of the url is "dynamic".
>
> This seems to be a commonly voiced fear but searching on
> various search engines simply doesn't see
thats why u stick your dynamic content in your meta tags
been that way 4 yrs now
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
o you cfeclipse? http://cfeclipse.tigris.org
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Dinowitz
>Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 9:44 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: search engine safe URLs
>
>I have. When I redid the HoF
;
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2004 22:36:24 -0700
Subject: Re: search engine safe URLs
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It doesnt take much searching on google or yahoo to see that dynamic
pages DO get indexed.
I read somewhere recently that its not an issue of dynamic pages being
indexed, however, the i
It doesnt take much searching on google or yahoo to see that dynamic
pages DO get indexed.
I read somewhere recently that its not an issue of dynamic pages being
indexed, however, the issue is that the search engines will not spider
pages from a dynamic url.
This is not something that i have been
> http://www.mysite.com/index.cfm?page=productSummary&catID=12
>
> however, most search engines will only index the index.cfm page sine the
> remainder of the url is "dynamic".
This seems to be a commonly voiced fear but searching on various
search engines simply doesn't seem to back this up and
>however, most search engines will only index the index.cfm page sine the
>remainder of the url is "dynamic".
I wonder how much that is still true. Admittedly, I do mostly intranet-based work, but I recently built a site for my wife's real estate business and had no problems with URLs for a Fusebo
Hello all,
I have an app that calls pages dynamically via switching statements and
url variables similar to early fusebox applications.
Something like:
http://www.mysite.com/index.cfm?page=productSummary&catID=12
however, most search engines will only index the index.cfm page sine the
remainder
www.ukcfug.org
Spike does good stuff.
Stephen
Ketan Patel wrote:
> Has anybody tried this FriendlyURL Servlet.
> http://www.spike.org.uk/go/friendly-urls
> If yes please email me some sites whicha re using that.
>
> Ketan Patel
> G3 Technology Group, LLC
> http://www.instantposition.com
>
[T
Has anybody tried this FriendlyURL Servlet.
http://www.spike.org.uk/go/friendly-urls
If yes please email me some sites whicha re using that.
Ketan Patel
G3 Technology Group, LLC
http://www.instantposition.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settin
by the harvest you reap, but by the seeds you plant.
--Robert Louis Stevenson
Reply Separator
Subject:RE: Search engine safe urls
Author: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8/3/2003 10:50 PM
> I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer
> I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that
> works so I'm going to ask here. In the release notes for
> the updater it says as one of the features fixed:
> Search engine safe URLs of the form *.cfm/* did not work
> properly, so a URL such as ht
://somedomain.com/test.html/name/value
Mark
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls
Did you do something to IIS or to CFMX? Are you on a single site machine or
multi-homed? I&#
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:08 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls
>
>
> I think your missing the point and origin of SES urls. Basically, it goes
> back
> to 96 or 97 and has to
2003 3:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls
I think your missing the point and origin of SES urls. Basically, it goes
back
to 96 or 97 and has to do with a small 'feature' where anything AFTER the
file
name would be pumped into the CGI.path_info. It didn't matter i
PROTECTED]
> WWW: http://www.evoch.com/
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:55 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls
> >
> >
> > Nope. A
Tel: (301) 942-5378
Fax: (301) 933-3651
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.evoch.com/
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:55 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls
>
>
> So does this code work for you? I'm running on the internal web server, but
as I said its throwing the identical error you reported.
Nope. I've used my original code as well as new tests and the core problem is
that the url is not being recognized as containing a valid template by CFMX. It
neve
entral.com
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Robertson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Search engine safe urls
>
>
> I have something that works here for me in CFMX with "the latest
> updater"
I have something that works here for me in CFMX with "the latest updater". Its a
modification of Ben Forta's cf_FakeURL, which threw a 500 when I just tried it a
second ago. So did Pablo Varando's code.
The problem is cgi.path_info is coming back as the same value as what I'd expect to
see fr
Nope. A 500:
http://lotauctions.com/index.cfm/name=a
The server encountered an error and was unable to complete your request.
Message: ISAPI DLL D:\CFusionMX\runtime\lib\wsconfig\2\jrun.isa returned error
status for this request.
Basically, the url is being passed to the CF engine and it has no c
ECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:41 PM
> Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls
>
>
> > The two main things I have heard about this are:
> >
> > 1. Make sure to have a base tag in you head
> >
> > 2.
Michael, check this tutorial out:
http://tutorial90.easycfm.com/
Pablo
- Original Message -
From: "Heald, Tim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 3:41 PM
Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls
> The two
: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 8:27 AM
Subject: Search engine safe urls
> I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that works so I'm
going to
> ask here. In the release notes for the updater it says as one of the
features
> fixed:
> Search engine safe URLs of the
-Talk
Subject: Search engine safe urls
I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that works so I'm going
to
ask here. In the release notes for the updater it says as one of the
features
fixed:
Search engine safe URLs of the form *.cfm/* did not work properly, so a URL
such
Michael,
Just a shot in the dark: is your web server software intercepting the urls and pumping
out 404's before CF can get hold of them?
--
---
Matt Robertson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSB Designs, Inc. http://mysecretbase.com
-
I've looked high and low and I can't find an answer that works so I'm going to
ask here. In the release notes for the updater it says as one of the features
fixed:
Search engine safe URLs of the form *.cfm/* did not work properly, so a URL such
as http:/server/test.cfm/alpha/beta wo
Interesting..
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Ahlenius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 30 June 2003 9:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX
Taco,
Your documentation/header seems invalid, if it is supposed to be XML:
you forgot to close the createDate tag
:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX
You could form al your links like index.cfm/var=foo
And use the custom tag I wrote, remove the cf_error tag
Message-
| From: Taco Fleur [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 13:15
| To: CF-Talk
| Subject: RE: Search engine safe urls in CFMX
|
|
| You could form al your links like index.cfm/var=foo
|
| And use the custom tag I wrote, remove the cf_error tag
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Staple [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 30 June 2003 8:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: FW: Search engine safe urls in CFMX
Hi
Can anyone tell me how you turn urls into search
Hi
Can anyone tell me how you turn urls into search engine safe urls in
Coldfusion Mx
i.e
TURN
index.cfm?user=Joe Bloggs&bgcolor=blue&county=2
INTO
index.cfm/user=Joe Bloggs/bgcolor=blue/county=2
etc etc
Thanks in Advance
Jerry Staple
Web Application Developer
C
make sure anything that might have special characters or spaces uses
URLEncodedFormat()
> -Original Message-
> From: Eron Cohen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 9:56 AM
> To: Cf-Talk
> Subject: Search Engine Safe URLs
>
>
> Sorry tha
Sorry that this may be a repeated question, but I still haven't figured out
how to properly accomplish Search Engine Safe URLs with fusebox. Can anyone
give me a brief rundown on how to do this, or tell me where to find the
resources on how to do this. Right now, my URLs are all
49 matches
Mail list logo
