Message -
From: paul smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 11:03 AM
Subject: RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes?
> I got the difference down to 15% by eliminating CFSETs
> in the Structure version. (Structure still sl
You mentioned eliminating CFSET's
is that the actually initalization
of the structures?
its not going to be very fair to do a cached
query just pulling data versus
setting and pulling the data.. im
assuming that is what you mean by
eliminating cfsets in the structure
version.
Also I n
Thanks! In an entirely different Structure/Cached Query application
comparison from the one where I earlier today posted the code here,
I'm seeing Structures are still 15% slower.
Dave Watts opined here that he didn't believe there really was a
limit to how many queries CF would cac
ewww... I hate long blocks of cfset's :)
Use cfscript instead when you have all those cfsets.. that'll speed
things up some more.
Additionally, a question: I've never had any problems with just
sticking data in a structure, but without "creating" the structure using
StructNew().. does anyone k
>>>Thanks! In an entirely different Structure/Cached Query application
comparison from the one where I earlier today posted the code here,
I'm seeing Structures are still 15% slower.
Without doing tests, I believe this is going to be the case. Structures are
more efficient f
,
Robert Hinojosa
WebDeveloper
512.912.3775
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.cirrus.com
-Original Message-
From: Billy Cravens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 12:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes?
ewww... I hate long blocks of cfset&#
Structure is more faster than query for example if you want to create a
shopping
cart, all information is saved in memory and you can add, delete, update
structures to change items and it is much faster than saving items in
database.
Cache query may be faster only for display.
At 09:38 AM 8/31
wrote:
>You mentioned eliminating CFSET's
>is that the actually initalization
>of the structures?
--
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion
Which is less efficient? I re-ran my test with
and saw no statistically
significant difference.
best, paul
At 12:48 PM 8/31/00 -0400, you wrote:
>Also I notice from the structure version you use
>APPLICATION.YPS["#Class_ID#"]["Pages"] IS "C">
>
>and then in the Query version you use
>
>
>
>Al
The purpose of my posting was
a heads up to those folks who really
know how to do this sort of thing.
But what I have done is a valid
indicator for my app. That is, I
was attempting to hold all things
constant except how the data was
stored in/read from memory.
In addition, consider the followi
In my case it is fair, since I'm only
interested in reads. Structures are
widely touted as a way to store a DB
in memory to speed things up. I was
surprised to find results that suggested
a cached query was faster.
BTW, note that if this result is valid,
it means stored procedures are
Interesting. FindNoCase had an effect on the Structure but
not the Cached version. Structure still slower, 194/180 = 8%
instead of 15%.
best, paul
At 11:42 AM 8/31/00 -0500, you wrote:
>As an aside, I'd be curious to know how FindNoCase would affect processing
>time if you replaced "eq" and "
This came up in the last two days.
Check the archives.
best, paul
At 12:31 PM 8/31/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Additionally, a question: I've never had any problems with just
>sticking data in a structure, but without "creating" the structure using
>StructNew().. does anyone know what the implicati
These CFSETs are one-time, when App is first accessed.
Their ms is not included in the timings I posted.
best, paul
At 12:31 PM 8/31/00 -0500, you wrote:
>ewww... I hate long blocks of cfset's :)
>
>Use cfscript instead when you have all those cfsets.. that'll speed
>things up some more.
>
>
>
Try CompareNoCase. ;)
-Original Message-
From: paul smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2000 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Andy Peterson
Subject: Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes?
Interesting. FindNoCase had an effect on the Structure but
not the
Brief test. I doubted, so I tried. At first I was a little misled... then
realized I wasn't testing properly. ;) Don't try doing this with a loops...
loops throw it off. And be sure to reset the ticks between each test.
CFSET x = 1 times:
1 cfset: 0 milliseconds
10 cfsets: 0 milliseconds
100 cfse
on the queries vs. structures discussion you're comparing apples and
oranges. If you have data that you're going to loop over and output, use a
query. That's what they're designed for. But if you're going to call
individual pieces of data (particularly organizati
ped queries. Essentially the same
>thing, but I like managing my own caching rather than allowing the server
>to determine what gets cached (based on the rotating list of "last used").
>Just a preference.
>
>But on the queries vs. structures discussion you're compari
It would depend a lot on how you're using the information now, that is, how
people are accessing it. Structures (particularly nested structures) are
great for drill down information. But if you're doing a lot of looping,
then queries might be faster.
What might work is the nested
o the same database table, see example.
What is the recommended limit for inserts using cftransction, the structures
that I want to insert en masse could total maybe 40 insert queries, is this
too much!
I've also considered keeping the next table id numbers for a given
application s
Hello,
I'm going to get around to testing this later, but I wonder if anyone knows
off the top of their head:
Prior to Updater 3, CFMX was unable to use webservice (communication
between 2 CFMX Servers) with a Query/RecordSet inside of a key in a
Structure. Does anyone know if this has been fi
for a query named qNames
where columnList="id,name,car"
Does this help at all?
Jerry Johnson
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/26/03 04:10PM >>>
Instead of me pasting code and trying to explain problem - could somebody
give me the breakdown on treating query objects a
-
> From: Cantrell, Adam
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:11 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: treating queries as structures/array
>
>
>
> Instead of me pasting code and trying to explain problem -
> could somebody give me the breakdown on treating query
the conversion to a list. What am I missing?
Adam.
> -Original Message-
> From: Cantrell, Adam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:11 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: treating queries as structures/array
>
>
> Instead of me pasting code and try
ariables4.html
CA> (I know that's from the docs, but it took a search for me to find it - hence
CA> the domain)
CA> Adam.
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Cantrell, Adam
>> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 3:11 PM
>> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTE
> Instead of me pasting code and trying to explain problem - could somebody
> give me the breakdown on treating query objects as structures/arrays one
> more time - like referring to records and columns using array notation,
> etc.
> There has to be an online resource that
ver
> overhead each operation incurs and a list has the lowest overhead per
> operation. You only want to use arrays or maps (structs) when you
> require random access to the data. Arrays tend to be a good way of
> representing different types of trees, which generally are the best data
>
tree tag in cf? lets talk
examples...
do you modify the array, ( ie inserting or deleting array members other
than from the end?) if not then u could index the array using structures
item_array=ArrayNew(1);
item_struct=StructNew();
x
aketree tag in cf? lets talk
> examples...
>
> do you modify the array, ( ie inserting or deleting array members other
> than from the end?) if not then u could index the array using structures
>
>
> item_array=ArrayNew(1);
> item_struct=StructNew();
>
>
>
If I understand you correctly, you are representing a hierarchical
relationship in a tabular manner. If there is another way you can store
this information I would suggest it highly as there are many data
structures much better suited for storage of hierarchical information.
For example, a tree
Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> You can see the code here:
> http://www.houseoffusion.com/_library/maketree.txt
> Your example will fail as there can be more than one item with the same
> 'parent', which is what we're looking for. No matter what, we have to do a
> search and the list search functions see
there is another way you can store
>this information I would suggest it highly as there are many data
>structures much better suited for storage of hierarchical information.
>For example, a tree would give you O(log N) vs. your current O(N)
>performance. As you can see, if N is large it ma
tara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 7:59 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Lists vs. Arrays vs. Structures
>
> As an aside to this co
On Monday, December 9, 2002, at 05:53 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:
> I highly recommend people look into a hierarchical engine for handle
> hierarchical information.
>
>
Any suggestions, recommendations?
TIA
Dick
~|
Archives: http:/
dent & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
> -Original Message-
> From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 10:00 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Lists vs. Arrays vs. Structures
>
> On
Yahoo IM : cfjedimaster
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Paolo Cesana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 9:37 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Sorting an array of structures
>
>
>
Can anyone see anything wrong with this code? I am trying to loop through
data to find the Sales Persons login id and for each sales person return the
activities, dates, contacts, etc. for them to see. The error is listed
below.
There are two pages to this.
The first page goes out and retrieve
ete all of the structures that were constructed for a page after it is
analyzed and before the next page is begun? Or is that not necessary?
Can anyone enlighten me?
Thanks,
-- Tim Dempsey
--
Archives: http://www.eGroup
Session, URL, form, etc variables e.g. FORM.MyVar is a variable stored in
the FORM scope. It just happens thas as from CF4.5 all FORM, URL, SESSION,
APPLICATION, COOKIE (etc.) scoped variables are stored as structures such
that you can use the various structure functions on them. Before
Jordahl
Macromedia
From: Chris Rice [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 5:19 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Problem using structures with SOAP...
Hi everyone,
I'm new to this list and I have a problem which is seriously holding
ba
I have seen this in MySQL editors, but does MS SQL have an export feature that will
export the table structures and such or an export that builds the CREATE TABLE syntax
for a list of tables.
Any help would be great!
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
yeah i think it's called "generate sql scripts" or something like that...
enterprise manager
-Original Message-
From: Paul Giesenhagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: MS SQL - Exporting table structures
I have see
CTED]]
>Sent: 20 May 2002 16:41
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: MS SQL - Exporting table structures
>
>
>yeah i think it's called "generate sql scripts" or something like that...
>enterprise manager
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Paul Giesenhagen [m
YER.ADDRESS" in dimension 1 of object
"Session.Intake.Guardian" cannot be found. Please, modify the member name"
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Olive, CIO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 7:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: N
both work.
-Original Message-
From: Eric Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 11:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Nested Structures and Arrays - Addendum
Sorry I miss typed the code, what I meant was
Session.Intake = struc
Hi Eric,
The code looks OK to me. A structure in CF is really an associated array,
and Cf only support for three dimensional arrays. Your code nested four
structures, so I am not sure if this is the problem. But I remember in the
CF advanced training course the instructor said by creating
tesimally quicker for CF to parse?
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Eric Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 4:35 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Nested Structures and Arrays - Addendum
Sorry I miss typed the code, what I meant was
Session.Intake =
"DeVoil,
Nick"To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Nested Stru
Structures seem totally useless to me. If they were two dimensional,
then I could see definite value. I'd love to see something like:
.. etc ...
As I understand it right now from reading the CF docs and Forta's books,
structures are nothing at all but a one dimensional
Hi all,
How do we create Array of Structures in ColdFusion? As an example I have a
query to get the list of employees and I need to create it as an array of
structures. How do you populate data and how can we retrieve it?
Example Query:
select ssn, firstName, lastName from employee
Thanks,
Ajoy
This works...
but this throws an error ("Invalid token found on line 2 at position 41" -
the apostrophe after LoggedIn)...
This doesn't throw an error, but dumping the session variable to screen
doesn't display a key called LoggedIn in the session variable...
Is it possible to use the
oi Critz!!
Bah, nevermind mei'm half asleep still!
--
Critter, MMCP
Certified ColdFusion Developer
Crit[s2k] -
-
Tuesday, November 13, 2001, 9:23:09 AM, you wrote:
C> oi Kola!!
C> I didn't think forms were a structure in versions LT 4.5 ?
C> I
Thanks All on your input array notation looks like the best route. I was
using dot notation since I am familiar with it more than any other.
Basically It would appear that my suspicion that it is a CF Language
limitation is correct, but only specific to adding nested structures to
arrays using
I believe you have the option of storing session variables in the registry
(not sure where) or in a specific datasource.
At 09:47 AM 11/25/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Once a structure has been created and populated, where is the data kept? I
>can't find it in the registry anywhere but it persists ac
t out of the
database and then serialize it into the structure. This is a good way to
build a clusterable application that uses client variables or other
structures for setting user preferences.
HTH
James McCullough
-Original Message-
From: Michael She [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sat
Session variables are stored in client side cookies and/or
server memory. They DO NOT get stored in the registry. The
variables that get stored in the registry are Client
variables. There is a BIG difference in the two. For
example you cant story a structure in a Client variable with
out using
> Session variables are stored in client side cookies and/or
> server memory. They DO NOT get stored in the registry. The
> variables that get stored in the registry are Client
> variables. There is a BIG difference in the two. For
> example you cant story a structure in a Client variable with
Then how would the persist across the reboots?
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 1:34 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: Structures: Where is data kept
>
>
&
> > Session variables are NOT stored in client-side
> > cookies. They're always
> > stored in memory. What is stored in cookies are
> > the two tokens CF uses to
> > associate a user's browser with those variables
> > stored in memory.
>
> Then how would the persist across the reboots?
They do
; Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> > Subject: RE: Structures: Where is data kept
> >
> >
> > > Session variables are stored in client side
> > cookies and/or
> > > server memory. They DO NOT get stored in the
> > registry. The
> > > varia
You know they don't and I know they don't, but earlier in
this thread the gentleman said they where making it across
"reboots". The only thing that would explain that is if the
data was being held in a cookie. Now I guess the question
is which machine is he talking about the reboot on. If it's
ry of the
browser?
Just a thought (or two..)
-Bill
/intraget
- Original Message -
From: Bill Killillay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 4:26 PM
Subject: RE: Structures: Where is data kept
> You know they don't a
Hi,
I need some good examples and explanations on how to teach coldfusion
arrays and structures. maybe some drawings or illustrations. Please send
any examples to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks
Martin
--
Martin Orth - CFSOLUTIONS
Oberblissenbach 30 - 51515 Kuerten
Tel. 02207 700650 - [EMAIL
Try User[13].FullName, u can use that with recordsets.
Structures work the same, and you have a tool called QueryToStruct, which
converts your query to a structure.
Regards,
Johan Coens
-Original Message-
From: Mike Amburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: donderdag 4 januari 2001 15:03
I've never had any difficulties in using this..
SELECT BLAH BLAH BLAH
#qQuery.SomeField[10]#
At 09:02 AM 1/4/01 -0500, you wrote:
>subject says it all
>
>let's say a have a record set of users and wanted to get the first name
>of row #13. could i use something like:
>
> Use
This sytnax will not work with recordsets... the index of the array must
come after the fieldname...
At 03:13 PM 1/4/01 +0100, you wrote:
>Try User[13].FullName, u can use that with recordsets.
>Structures work the same, and you have a tool called QueryToStruct, which
>converts your
Try using a WDDX packet, you can store those as strings in a DB.
-Original Message-
From: Darren Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 April 2001 09:39
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Storing structures in a DB
Hello,
Just a simple question that probably has a simple answer.
Can a
rge text
field. Otherwise of course you can have a table
with one column for each field in the struct.
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Darren Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 9:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Storing structures in a DB
Hello,
Just a simple
I would normally use columns in a database and not worry about structures
but, from the looks of the spec that I have got there is more of a
complicated structure.
basically it is a company information section for our intranet.
Within the Slow_stream table there will be coluimns for
Company
Darren, my advice would be to abandon the column approach and create a DB
with some well defined columns then you can use XML/WDDX to store sructures
which hold any kind of CF variable for manipulation.
this way you have a re-usable DB which does not need to be redefined for
everyjob - you could
-Talk
Subject: RE: Storing structures in a DB
I would normally use columns in a database and not worry about structures
but, from the looks of the spec that I have got there is more of a
complicated structure.
basically it is a company information section for our intranet.
Within the Slow_stream
You may wish to spend a little time analyzing how these data are
going to be accessed within the database.
If you are going to (regularly) search/sort any of these data, then
structures, wddx, large composite text fields are a poor choice.
each column in the database should be atomic
Subject: RE: Storing structures in a DB
You may wish to spend a little time analyzing how these data are
going to be accessed within the database.
If you are going to (regularly) search/sort any of these data, then
structures, wddx, large composite text fields are a poor choice.
each column
At 10:21 AM +0100 4/25/01, DeVoil, Nick wrote:
>I think you'll save yourself a lot of trouble later if you
>do a normalised database design with all necessary tables,
>columns etc and access them individually.
>
>Nick
>
Great advice... the database should reflect the structure of the
data, not
Agreed, but take the scenario of having to create a DB for every project
with an avg development time of 5-6 weeks (for true testing); Object Based
Development is the way forward, DB development thru XML is the future.
N
~~
Structure your Col
Yes and no
Say you have some data in a cf program say some arrays, simple
variables, lists, and maybe even some structures.
Now, you want to store all this in a single field (column) in a database.
The easiest way is to create 1 big structure, serialize it into a
wddx packet, and store the
You didn't post what you are agreeing to?
What do you mean "DB development thru XML is the future" ?
Dick
At 10:59 AM +0100 4/25/01, Neil Clark wrote:
>Agreed, but take the scenario of having to create a DB for every project
>with an avg development time of 5-6 weeks (for true testing); Object
Well, data either stored as XML or defined by XML is the way DB's are going,
there is not question about that.
N
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: ht
How does that speed up development time though?
-Original Message-
From: Neil Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 11:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Storing structures in a DB
Well, data either stored as XML or defined by XML is the way DB's are going,
That makes sense to me !
Thanks for your help folks
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 April 2001 10:59
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Storing structures in a DB
Yes and no
Say you have some data in a cf program say some arrays, simple
variables
At 11:25 AM +0100 4/25/01, Neil Clark wrote:
>Well, data either stored as XML or defined by XML is the way DB's are going,
>there is not question about that.
Well, I haven't kept up on all the latest, but I think I can give you
some current reasons and some historical perspective why XML may be
Image you have a DB and 1 table with say 3 fields - ID (GUUISD), Label, and
a final one Properties (ntext) - you could potentially store all information
you would need in this format using XML - you can then deserialise the data
as you need it, many different types of information can be stored in
I agree that this is *an* excellent way to develop/prototype an database.
However, the overhead is so significant, both in storage and
processing that you probably would not want to use this in an
operational environment.
serialization/deserialization aside, how do you efficiently store and
s
Easy, import / DTS the legacy information into your new DB schema and
utilise Meta information to allow for searching capabilties - storage and
processing should never come into it - if the DB is well designed along with
the code; then the server should simply be doing its job - serving.
as for
04/25/2001 06:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AT INTERNET@CCMAIL
cc:(bcc: Douglas Knudsen/ATL/ALLTELCORP)
Subject: RE: Storing structures in a DB
Well, data either stored as XML or defined by XML is the way DB's are
going,
there is no
Your reasoning?
N
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/
> as for normalizing; with a globally designed DB - it is not necessary; the
logic is ported into the App.
Well, sorry to bore people with this now slightly OT thread,
but "there's the rub" - by storing all the data in one table
you have thrown away all the inherent business-modelling
capability
> > as for normalizing; with a globally designed DB - it is not
> > necessary; the logic is ported into the App.
>
> Well, sorry to bore people with this now slightly OT thread,
> but "there's the rub" - by storing all the data in one table
> you have thrown away all the inherent business-modell
On the topic of relational tables:
If I create a relational DB structure but do not define the relationship at
the database level, is there a loss in performance when my application
requests data from two tables based on the relationship. I guess what I'm
asking is do you need to define the re
> If I create a relational DB structure but do not define the
> relationship at the database level, is there a loss in performance
> when my application requests data from two tables based on the
> relationship. I guess what I'm asking is do you need to define
> the relationship at the DB leve
Can anyone lend me a hand ?
I am trying to store one database in an array of structures then insert it
into another database.
I am only using one field at the moment but, there will be 9 that I want to
copy over.
What I am trying to do is to take PressReleaseHeader from the
pressreleasetable
truct type and to be honest I wasn't able to get things working
with Visual Basic too (the returned structure is always empty).
Other products, f.e. Borland Delphi 7 do not seem to have problems with
structures.
Best regards,
Peter
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[F
I'm trying to put some picture info into a variable that will be easy
for the designers to use.
I have to query a database to get specific images. I then tweak the
results and want to put them into a variable similar to this.
FeaturesOptions.image1.fileLocation = http://www.asdf.com/asdf.jpg
Feat
That'll get you an array of structures. One thing to note, unlike this...
myStruct.myKey = "somevalue"
which works in creating a struct, key and value...
myArrayOfStructs[1].myKey = "somevalue"
will fail with an
On 4/24/05, Thane Sherrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to understand structures - I understand that they are like the
> form scope in that I can access them as myStruct.myVar, but is there a way
> to create an array of structures?
myArray = arrayNew(1)
my
At 12:57 PM 24/04/2005, Adrian Lynch wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>That'll get you an array of structures. One thing to note, unlike this...
Thanks for this - it's much clearer now. Now I can give it a shot in my app.
T
---
[This
At 12:57 PM 24/04/2005, Sean Corfield wrote:
>If you're just getting your head around this stuff, I strongly suggest
>you buy Jeff Peters' book: "ColdFusion Lists, Arrays & Structures":
>
>http://www.protonarts.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=Books.showBookDet
cture.
Eg.
-Original Message-
From: Thane Sherrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 11:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Structures (probably a stupid question)
I'm trying to understand structures - I understand that they are like the
form scope in that I can
> -Original Message-
> From: Thane Sherrington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2005 11:21 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Structures (probably a stupid question)
>
> I'm trying to understand structures - I understand that they are like the
> fo
>At 12:57 PM 24/04/2005, Sean Corfield wrote:
>
>>If you're just getting your head around this stuff, I strongly suggest
>>you buy Jeff Peters' book: "ColdFusion Lists, Arrays & Structures":
>>
Excellent advice. Jeff Peters' b
201 - 300 of 417 matches
Mail list logo
