all this cfscript talk...
can I just have a step debugger...and breakpointsand watches
pretty please?
On 5/9/06, Gary Menzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Damn good suggestion.
>
> I had previously suggested the idea of having another CFSETTING attribute
> (something like "lang") to set it a
Damn good suggestion.I had previously suggested the idea of having another CFSETTING attribute (something like "lang") to set it as a default for CFSCRIPT.There are dozens of ways they COULD implement it and not BREAK previous versions.
GaryOn 5/9/06, Chris Velevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5
On 5/9/06, Mark Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - ECMA compliance will break existing cfscript & MM/Adobe won't break
> backward compatibility in CF.
It might be better get Adobe to update the cfscript tag to include
lang="ecmascript" that way it opens to door to lang="java" or whatever
your
On 5/9/06, Mark Stanton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People often forget that CF is geared towards entry level web
> development - "make pdf's and reports in 5 minutes" is the sweet spot
> for CF - not proper OO, or more elegant/advanced language features.
Not really, ASP is the same overall whe
I had a brief dab/look over the sample appsstill am yet to run accross a flash app that I think is better then an html app to be honest.back in 2001 I thought flash was gunna be the be all and end all of everything but from my perspectice (someone who doesn't follow flash) it hasn't done anything i
An easy solution to that would be to have or maybe even
?
> - ECMA compliance will break existing cfscript & MM/Adobe won't break
> backward compatibility in CF.
>
--
Haikal Saadh, Applications Programmer
Teaching and Learning Support Services
K405, Queensland University of Technology, Kelv
They can retain the GT/LT for backwards compatibility.And, adding new or alternative operators to a parser IS easy - if you have written the parser correctly (I've built enough of them in the past to know this).
Yes, fully ECMA compliant, and fully backwards compatible would be a BIG ask.But - if w
Hey Gary
- ECMA compliance will break existing cfscript & MM/Adobe won't break
backward compatibility in CF.
- I doubt very much whether writing/implementing a language/syntax and
all the stuff that goes with it could ever be called an easy thing to
do. Maybe your definition of easy is a little
Its out! http://labs.adobe.com
Not sure how many people on this list have been playing with it, but I'm
a little frustrated they removed the functions setCapture() and
releaseCapture()
Cos... I'm a newbie and they were really handy functions to use to
capture the events for something on the s
Many people (myself included) have raised this issue before. Just make CFSCRIPT ECMA compliant (at least in regard to operators).It would HAVE to be a very simply thing to do but MM/ADOBE have always said there were bigger fish to fry.
I guess with the upsurge in AJAX (and more people getting into
I've had something like this on the backburner for a while - create a
tag to enclose snippets of Java code. The tag wraps the code with
appropriate Java class header/footers, saves it in a temp file,
creates an instance of javac and compiles the temporary file,
instantiates the resulting
> I also think that break points are an extremely long shot.
awww... Mark, that's mean! I can dream, can't I? at least your beanie
isn't worried forbeing your next meal...
BTW, they *have* been looking into debugging hooks, it's just not easy
to implement at the moment. one of those decisio
doesn't really help. i could examine the wsdl and parse it, etc but
seems like a lot work. i need some like wsdl2java, but for cf. i know i
can use wsdl2java with cf, but am trying to avoid classpath dependacies.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message bec
The reason most people don’t use cfscript is
because it’s incomplete.
If it supported everything, especially in cfc’s
I think most developers would code all cfcs in cfscript where ideally there
should be no HTML if your separating your view and model.
Regards
Dale Fraser
F
Most customers wouldn't know what's good for them if they got run over a
B-double full of it :D
/Philosophy seems to work for 37 Signals...
Joel Cass wrote:
*snip*
> "We should all be using .net because our customers want it").
*snip*
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You
The last time there was the whole cfscript debate we found the majority more often used the tags then scripting corfields breeze thingo had a poll that showed this.hence the M in the CFMSome people want CFM to be so much like other languages that they could simply use those other languages,
Person
Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'll eat my hat if CF8 has
significantly enhanced cfscript support. I also think that break
points are an extremely long shot.
On 5/9/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've had the exact same thoughts, more along the lines of writing the code
> in a fa
Slightly off topic, but in my tutorial last night we were talking about
organisational culture and politics in different industries. People in my
tutorial come from a broad range of backgrounds, including government
departments, large management firms, research companies, and IT. Were were
asked t
I've had the exact same thoughts, more along the lines of writing the code
in a familiar like java and preparsing / compiling the code back to cf
stuff.
It wouldn't be that hard, I was thinking supporting a simple java syntax
rather than cfscript so that I could get rid of those pesky gt lt bits.
I've actually fantasied taking that 10%, wrapping in functions, and
injecting in on startup to web-inf.component. Or extend
web-inf.component, and include those methods, and have all my code
extend the new and improved component.
Has anyone done this yet? If not, why?
Dale Fraser wrote:
> I'd
On 5/8/06, M@ Bourke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
now if pricing is simply the only reason for changeing why not php or 1 of the many other free languages over .net? you already said they are using windoze, so no use me saying cf on linux may be cheaper then .net on windoze :S
When you consider
On the subject of acronyms:
CLAP - Coldfusion, Linux, Apache, PostgreSQL - A combination that
works well for me.
Be careful communicating this acronym to management if english is not
your first language :)
Vorn.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message b
22 matches
Mail list logo
