of the language in the same
way.
Coming from a Schemer? Pot. Kettle. Black.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
!
Who would have thought!
I'd SemperSectum you if I believed you, for giving the plot away.
Fortunately I know you're the victim of the Lucas Cinaema curse!
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http
On 8/10/07, Arto Bendiken [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/10/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW that site is showing LiSP for $CA 76.86,
not exactly a deal.
It's up to CDN$ 94.40, now, with that being a price increase of 90.45
since yesterday when it was still selling
On 8/9/07, Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
On 8/9/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LiSP is now their #1 bestseller, bigger even than Harry Potter!
That's a joke, right? How would I compare sales numbers of Amazon
books? I'm reading the 7th Harry Potter
On 7/24/07, Peter Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
config.guess seems to screw that up a bit, but it didn't seem to affect the
compilation and/or function of Chicken.
Does the CMake build work?
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing
to it. Pretty bad idea I think, so I'm wondering if
the adding numbers trick solved the spam problem.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
history are doomed to repeat it?
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On 7/13/07, felix winkelmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Try passing -DWITHOUT_LIBFFI=TRUE to ccmake (or cmake).
I don't know why this fails.
It fails on MinGW also, but I assumed that was because it wasn't
supported on MinGW. Is it supposed to work?
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
. This functionality is trivial
and should always be working, very strange if it is not. Please give
platform, compiler, make VERBOSE=1 output, etc.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman
I'm going to guess you have a bad build environment. Please give your
PATH and the output of make --version. I'll see if I can reproduce
on my own real XP SP2 box.
Cheers,
Brandon
On 7/13/07, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 11:35 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 7
On 7/13/07, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 13, 2007, at 4:27 PM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
I'm going to guess you have a bad build environment. Please give your
PATH and the output of make --version. I'll see if I can reproduce
on my own real XP SP2 box.
Thank you for your
developer or cares about such
capabilities. But I thought I would mention it since it's something I
might be interested in. It deserves consideration for those who think
an OpenGL based GUI is the way to go. Also the license is better:
CEGUI is MIT, FLTK is LGPL.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
http://lukewelling.com/2006/08/03/java-programmers-are-the-erotic-furries-of-programming/
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Ok, so, like, refresh my memory why people object to wxWidgets.
Because, you know, like, it seems a pretty obvious choice for
cross-platform GUI work. http://www.wxwidgets.org
Is this about C++?
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing
New post on the CMake list, if someone wants to pursue it on Linux.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Mehdi Rabah [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jul 4, 2007 11:21 AM
Subject: [CMake] Deb and RPM package generation modules
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi everyone,
In case someone is interested
note that CMake / CTest / Dart dashboard already has
all these sorts of reporting capabilities in a lovely web format.
Here's an example:
http://www.vtk.org/Testing/Dashboard/20070628-0300-Nightly/Dashboard.html
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken
On 6/26/07, Jong-Hyouk Yun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this fine link mingw libraries with vc6 libraries together into same
executable image?
Not sure. I'd Google about the issue if I were you. I do know that
the different compilers have different mangling conventions.
Cheers,
Brandon Van
On 6/25/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Third. I can't remember if I got it working or not. I remember
doing it under MSYS, because compiling SDL under straight MinGW wasn't
possible and I didn't know if I could just use MSVC binaries. Anyways
it was a PITA because of all
in Trac's Settings
menu, as Trac assumes that anonymous contributions are spam. Also,
that's how you'll know if the status of the bug changes.
MinGW, Cygwin, and VS .NET 2003 are working fine, if you're willing to
use those.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
On 6/4/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
Speed, to the exclusion of all other considerations, is not the real
world. I can understand compiling portable Scheme code under any 2
different compilers. I cannot fathom trying to get such code to
interoperate
On 6/5/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
This is infrastructurally lame. Anyone who is that enamored with
speed deserves what they get. Efforts would be better spent actually
creating a community around Stalin and showing some leadership
addressing its
, extensions repository, mailing
list, and user community? The question isn't how you would use Stalin
with Chicken, but whether anyone uses Stalin at all.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org
don't. That's a big advantage to most
people.
Once upon a time, PLT's performance wasn't as good as Chicken's. I
don't know about now.
Chicken has some inherent ability to talk to C++. As far as I know,
PLT doesn't.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
On 6/2/07, Jens Axel Søgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[I am not on the Chicken mailing list, so I am responding
directly - feel free to any response to the mailing list]
Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 6/2/07, Alex Queiroz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In summary:
- Windows support
On 6/2/07, Jens Axel Søgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every skrev:
Chicken has some inherent ability to talk to C++. As far as I know,
PLT doesn't.
Are you thinking ABI here?
No, I'm saying Chicken understands some C++ constructs. That's one of
the reasons I went
/07, Ian Oversby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, they work, although I suppose it is possible that it is choosing
some other version from a different path. Let me try to install it
again at some point (hopefully this week) and get back to you.
Cheers,
Ian
On 19/05/07, Brandon Van Every
have great documentation, but they don't.
(2) Because Texinfo isn't relevant to all developers. The reality is
there's an Emacs crowd, a Visual Studio crowd, an Eclipse crowd, and various
other crowds.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing
.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
Can someone please verify that the Mac OS X build in Darcs head is working
properly? I don't have a Mac to test it on. Please also do a make
install, make uninstall, make install. There should be no static libraries
or executables after that.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
On 5/17/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please verify that the Mac OS X build in Darcs head is working
properly? I don't have a Mac to test it on. Please also do a make
install, make uninstall, make install. There should be no static libraries
or executables after
are
working fine for me.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On 5/17/07, Graham Fawcett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/16/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
Having the 2nd invocation of make install repeat the build from
scratch is not that important a bug, and all evidence says it's a
Linux specific bug.
I'd
On 5/17/07, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 17, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
Can someone please verify that the Mac OS X build in Darcs head is
working properly? I don't have a Mac to test it on. Please also
do a make install, make uninstall, make install
On 5/17/07, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 17, 2007, at 1:08 PM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
On 5/17/07, Kon Lovett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am having core dumps 'undefined variable |?|' from chicken
components. However, this is not a stock build. I am removing
On 5/17/07, Shawn W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 15, 2007, at 7:35 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
At a first go, read INSTALL-CMake.txt and try to build Chicken on
your Mac OS X. Then see the bugtracker ticket I've just added
about universal binaries. http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/214
On 5/17/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/17/07, Shawn W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 15, 2007, at 7:35 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
At a first go, read INSTALL-CMake.txt and try to build Chicken on
your Mac OS X. Then see the bugtracker ticket I've just added
to be in the Darcs repo. They are supposed to
be generated from the Darcs repo. Whose boot/cfiles would you use,
canonically speaking? They're always going to be different, their changelog
would be voluminous noise.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
On 5/15/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
We've had a feature complete, field tested, all but bug free CMake
build for awhile now. It took 1 man year to produce. It is the only
way to produce the MSVC versions of Chicken, and it is preferred for
MinGW
On 5/16/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
Having the 2nd invocation of make install repeat the build from
scratch is not that important a bug, and all evidence says it's a
Linux specific bug.
I'd like to see if it happens on a Solaris or BSD system. I've
On 5/16/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/16/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
Having the 2nd invocation of make install repeat the build from
scratch is not that important a bug, and all evidence says it's a
Linux specific bug
whatever the user wanted.
I've created a bug tracker entry, complete with your comments. Anyone
interested, let's move the conversation there.
http://trac.callcc.org/ticket/215
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users
of versioning. I haven't really gone up
the C# learning curve enough to recall whether an Assembly is a C# or a .NET
concept though. Nor whether it provides an ultimate solution.
Don't know if Java solves it either.
The theme is to put versioning in the language though.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
On 5/13/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey I just had a brilliant idea. We don't have to rename anything. We
could just symlink libchicken-s.a to libchicken.a. Then the user can have
his cake and eat it too.
On the other hand, we could eliminate all support for static
On 5/14/07, Thomas Christian Chust [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every wrote:
[...]
On the other hand, we could eliminate all support for static linking,
bowing to the One True Apple Way Of Doing Things [TM]. How do people
feel about that?
I wouldn't mind if static linking
On 5/14/07, Peter Keller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 11:55:31AM -0400, Brandon Van Every wrote:
Any static linking horror stories out there?
Sure, I have some that aren't necessarily apple related, but could
happen on that platform.
Ok Mac OS X users, what say you
On 5/14/07, Shawn W. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 10:24 AM, Brandon Van Every wrote:
Ok Mac OS X users, what say you? Should we tie your hands for your
own good, or give you the freedom to cut off your own fingers?
I don't care about static linking.
I've yet to hear
first, I added tickets
about that.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
to either fake it or
recompile lotsa source files. I chose to fake it, and I wonder if there's
anything incorrect or hazardous about the fake.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman
to libchicken.a. Then the user can have
his cake and eat it too.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
On 5/4/07, Brandon Van Every [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/1/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
Ew. Not a case use I remember thinking about, so wouldn't shock me if
there's something wrong. I'll look into it.
It's actually a pretty common
On 5/1/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
Ew. Not a case use I remember thinking about, so wouldn't shock me if
there's something wrong. I'll look into it.
It's actually a pretty common circumstance when you are updating
your Chicken regularly from
On 5/1/07, John Cowan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Van Every scripsit:
It suggests that CMake has bugs on Linux, and that people would have to
resolve them by posting on the CMake mailing list. There could be 2
separate bugs here. At least now we have confirmation that the make
have to
resolve them by posting on the CMake mailing list. There could be 2
separate bugs here. At least now we have confirmation that the make
install bug isn't just on Felix's box.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken
,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
abstract work everywhere infrastructure simply don't exist. I can't even
get people to do modest amounts of bughunting for the Visual Studio 2005
Express compiler.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
___
Chicken-users mailing list
Chicken-users@nongnu.org
http
55 matches
Mail list logo
