On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:20 AM, Joel Stanleyj...@jms.id.au wrote:
When I first got Chromium going on the beagleboard it was slow. I
believe the the main slowdown is due to the limited RAM (128MB), but
another factor was the slow disk I/O due to the root fs being held on
a cheap SD card.
Thanks for the reply Evan, but as normal on this project Linux gets
treated like the poor relation, always having to wait while the
windows users get the code. How any of this gels with Google's
intention to deliver a Linux based OS is beyond me, surely the
development should completely be the
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 19:38, Ben Laurieb...@chromium.org wrote:
warm: t= 397 528 3072 599
cold: t= 371 375 401 16
The cold startup are skewed as I suspect FUSE has extra caching that
/proc/sys/vm/drop_caches does not control. The warm startup numbers
show a
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Joel Stanleyj...@jms.id.au wrote:
The 'cold' run calls fdatasync() then posix_fadvise() with
POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED on the binary before running the test. This is
appears to be the only difference between cold and warm. I'm running
2.6.31-rc6 from Ubuntu
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 22:15, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
Just to eliminate any doubt, you can manually as root
echo 3 /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
to force the caches to be dropped.
I have been doing this.
I don't know how slow I'd expect an SD card to be, but this random
page I
In order to add the new features to a version, first, you have a (stable)
version and to make it work properly. Extensions are not a must, but a
convenience.Do you not agree?
The Windows version did not have Extensions at first, too. Not even in the
Chrome 1.
So stop with this attitude and
just curious... can anyone from the mac team speak up as to where this
is in the list of priorities or a ballpark date when it will be
included in the current chromium builds?
Thanks,
Jason
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list:
you mean Ogg/Theora right? I think Ogg/Vorbis is an auido codec, not a
video codec.
On Aug 4, 9:55 am, Albert J. Wong (王重傑) ajw...@chromium.org wrote:
This has come up a bunch, so I think it warrants a post.
If you're playing with the HTML5 video tag in a chromium build (ie. Daily
builds, or
--enable-sync
I know I have to add that to command line, no problem.
I already have the --enable-extensions, tho.
Sonowwhatdoido?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or
I don't understand why you are so seemingly miffed, it's technically
infeasible to add sync support to any non-Windows platform right now
because much of the code in locked in a proprietary google sync .dll
that they are currently trying to integrate directly into the Chromium
code base. It's not
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Thomas Van Lenten
thoma...@chromium.orgwrote:
Anyone adding more resources (xibs, etc.) to the Mac, please remember
always fetch them from mac_util::MainAppBundle() (base/mac_util.h) and do
*not* use any Cocoa apis that assume [NSBundle mainBundle]. As part
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Chrome?hl=en
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Catbert01bri...@gmail.com wrote:
--enable-sync
I know I have to add that to command line, no problem.
I already have the --enable-extensions, tho.
Sonowwhatdoido?
Right. Chromium only supports the Ogg container with Vorbis audio and
Theora video.
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 5:43 PM, loligoth loligo...@gmail.com wrote:
you mean Ogg/Theora right? I think Ogg/Vorbis is an auido codec, not a
video codec.
On Aug 4, 9:55 am, Albert J. Wong (王重傑)
You can have more than one command line parameter.
Just put one following the other separated by a space in between.
On Aug 18, 1:40 pm, Catbert 01bri...@gmail.com wrote:
--enable-sync
I know I have to add that to command line, no problem.
I already have the --enable-extensions, tho.
Has anyone else experienced chrome crashes on linux today?
I'm on the dev channel (3.0.198.1) and both at home and at
work it crashed on me when I tried to log in to gmail
the first time. Hasn't crashed thereafter.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers
I got a crash on an SSL site today.
It was http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=18907
(PS: when the crash dumper dumps a crash id, you can plug that into
the go/crash search box to see the backtrace you just uploaded.)
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:21 AM, Dan Kegeld...@kegel.com
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:38 PM, William Chan
(陈智昌)willc...@chromium.org wrote:
Here's a sample crash report whose minidump ends up as mostly garbage
when I run it through minidump_2_core:
http://crash/reportdetail?reportid=1b90a2edd4030e92.
minidump_2_core basically doesn't work. The
I've started working on a FreeBSD port. The first patch is here:
http://codereview.chromium.org/172032.
When looking at the patch, bear in mind a couple of things...
1. Added gyp lines for files like *_ar.pak are compensating for the fact
that i18n targets are not currently being handled
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Ben Laurieb...@chromium.org wrote:
#if defined(OS_LINUX) || defined(OS_FREEBSD)
and this is ugly.
It doesn't deeply worry me, except when NetBSD, OpenBSD come along.
Could you use OS_BSD instead? I know that some may assume that OS X
would be included, but I
we could go with like _nix or something, and consider OSX to not be
unix (which is kinda isn't). Really, in theory, we should have more
granular ifdefs ./configure style, but that is also really a pain in
my opinion.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Adam Langley a...@chromium.org wrote:
On
Rad that you're doing this!
I think that we shouldn't have any linux-specific directories except
for one or two cases where it's *really* Linux-specific (like crash
dumping or ). So the same should be true for you.
It seems the configurations we'll see most frequently in code are:
1) POSIX
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Rad that you're doing this!
I think that we shouldn't have any linux-specific directories except
for one or two cases where it's *really* Linux-specific (like crash
dumping or ). So the same should be true for you.
It
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Darin Fisherda...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Evan Martin e...@chromium.org wrote:
Rad that you're doing this!
I think that we shouldn't have any linux-specific directories except
for one or two cases where it's *really*
Hmm, have I touched a nerve.
On Aug 19, 5:32 pm, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to add the new features to a version, first, you have a (stable)
version and to make it work properly. Extensions are not a must, but a
convenience.Do you not agree?
The Windows version did not have
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:20 PM, Evan Martine...@chromium.org wrote:
I got a crash on an SSL site today.
It was http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=18907
Fumitoshi Ukai just fixed that crash in r23696 last night.
Wan-Teh
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Every so often I like peeking at the test coverage stats, but I'm seeing
403 Forbidden at the moment:http://build.chromium.org/buildbot/coverage/
Andrew
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change
Ben Laurie wrote:
The observation is that many places that are currently:
#if defined(OS_LINUX)
are going to become:
#if defined(OS_LINUX) || defined(OS_FREEBSD)
and this is ugly.
I think that these would generally be proper as defined(OS_POSIX)
!defined(OS_MACOSX). If people think that's
Oh, thanks a lot. You've helped me.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives, change email options, or unsubscribe:
http://groups.google.com/group/chromium-dev
Great -- thanks!
Andrew
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Bev Cristobal b...@chromium.org wrote:
Hi Andrew.
This has been fixed.
- Bev
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Andrew Scherkus scher...@chromium.orgwrote:
Every so often I like peeking at the test coverage stats, but I'm seeing
I agree with Ben and Peter, alt should highlight the wrench menu.
-Nick
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Peter Kasting pkast...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:40 PM, Evan Stade est...@chromium.org wrote:
Also, I don't really care which one alt highlights, but it seems to me
that
Could anyone please confirm whether chrome.windows.getCurrent is
broken or not? The fact is in 4.0.201.1 it never works.
Thanks for any comments/tips.
-Jack
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Chromium Developers mailing list: chromium-dev@googlegroups.com
View archives,
Highlighting the Tools menu is important for a similar reason that hooking
it to alt-f instead of alt-t is: people have ingrained key combos like
alt-f, x or alt, enter, x that they expect to work.
Or alt-f+s, or alt-f+p
Oh wait.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Mohamed Mansour m...@chromium.org wrote:
Are you guys referring to alt alone or alt-f, alt-e to highlight the
menu item?.
alt-f if triggered appropriately brings up full screen which is another
problem ...
Alt alone.
Fullscreen is F11 on Windows, not
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Glen Murphy g...@chromium.org wrote:
Highlighting the Tools menu is important for a similar reason that
hooking
it to alt-f instead of alt-t is: people have ingrained key combos like
alt-f, x or alt, enter, x that they expect to work.
Or alt-f+s, or
Are you guys referring to alt alone or alt-f, alt-e to highlight the
menu item?.
alt-f if triggered appropriately brings up full screen which is another
problem ...
- Mohamed Mansour
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Nick Baum nickb...@chromium.org wrote:
I agree with Ben and Peter, alt
Being dismissive and sarcastic will do that, yes.
--Amanda
On Wednesday, August 19, 2009, codfather swcodfat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, have I touched a nerve.
On Aug 19, 5:32 pm, PhistucK phist...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to add the new features to a version, first, you have a (stable)
The XP unit Purify bot has been failing for the last week or so.
Unfortunately, this has turned out to be more than just a simple case
where we can filter out a particular broken test. To fix it, we
either need a fix from IBM/Rational (unlikely, due to the nature of
the bug - see below), or we
I kinda feel like this is one of those things you can try hard to
premeditate, but in the end you'll just have to deal with it being
ugly for a while and hope it eventually converges to something better.
Sort of a non-answer, but I'd be happy to see this running on a BSD
first, and then we can
Would a quick fix of /3GB in the boot.ini and /LARGEADDRESSAWARE on the
linker cmdline be viable, or are we already doing that?
- nick
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Erik Kay erik...@chromium.org wrote:
The XP unit Purify bot has been failing for the last week or so.
Unfortunately, this
+1 for splitting unit_tests. On Linux, it's possible to generate a
2.3GB unit_tests binary that won't run. X-(
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Erik Kayerik...@chromium.org wrote:
The XP unit Purify bot has been failing for the last week or so.
Unfortunately, this has turned out to be more
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
I kinda feel like this is one of those things you can try hard to
premeditate, but in the end you'll just have to deal with it being
ugly for a while and hope it eventually converges to something better.
The changes in
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 1:06 PM, John Abd-El-Malek j...@chromium.org wrote:
This is very cool, but I ran into a few problems when I tried to run it:
a:\chrome2\src\chrometools\test\smoketests.py --tests=ui
You must have your local path of trunk/src/tools/python added to your
PYTHONPATH.
I don't know much about the technical details at play here, but a
couple of high level notes:
- I am sympathetic to concerns around codebase cleanliness. Many
people (like Brett) have spent very many months maintaining and
improving the hygiene of Chrome code. Sometimes it feels like an
uphill
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Brett Wilsonbre...@chromium.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Dean McNameede...@chromium.org wrote:
I kinda feel like this is one of those things you can try hard to
premeditate, but in the end you'll just have to deal with it being
ugly for a while
44 matches
Mail list logo
