On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
>>
>> >> At times, we seem to forget the impact of our silent updates. They are
>> >> great for bug/security fixes, but when we do roll out something like
>> >> NNTP,
>> >> it can lead to
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:11 PM, Peter Kasting wrote:
> All software, and all browsers, change their UI and capabilities as they
> release new versions. Look at how Firefox 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 3.5 all had
> different main window themes (and not just cosmetically; they moved pieces
> around and ch
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:22 AM, Nico Weber wrote:
> >> At times, we seem to forget the impact of our silent updates. They are
> >> great for bug/security fixes, but when we do roll out something like
> NNTP,
> >> it can lead to a 'WTF' moment. For future changes like this, it might
> make
> >
>> At times, we seem to forget the impact of our silent updates. They are
>> great for bug/security fixes, but when we do roll out something like NNTP,
>> it can lead to a 'WTF' moment. For future changes like this, it might make
>> sense to put in messaging for the upgrade so the users get lead
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Thomas Van Lenten wrote:
> At times, we seem to forget the impact of our silent updates. They are
> great for bug/security fixes, but when we do roll out something like NNTP,
> it can lead to a 'WTF' moment. For future changes like this, it might make
> sense to
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Amanda Walker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>> Do websites provide users with previous versions after overhauling their
>> UX? Some do (gmail seems to), but most do not. You just get to surf the
>> latest. Hopefully, the websi
The other part of this might just be messaging.
It's not uncommon for websites to have a link to let users try out the new
experience before it launches. And once it does launch, they always seem to
include a "Check out our new look and cool new features..." blurb. So it's
sudden switch, but mess
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> Do websites provide users with previous versions after overhauling their
> UX? Some do (gmail seems to), but most do not. You just get to surf the
> latest. Hopefully, the website changes for the better. That's our burden
> to bear.
And
Preliminary feedback shows that people are having a hard time fully
embracing the new tab page. While they love the fact that now they can move,
pin, hide thumbnails, other more vocal users are really missing the
customized search boxes. We'll continue to monitor.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:43 PM,
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 00:26, Mike Belshe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
>
>> Do websites provide users with previous versions after overhauling their
>> UX? Some do (gmail seems to), but most do not. You just get to surf the
>> latest. Hopefully, the website
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Ben Goodger (Google)
wrote:
>
> One day, we may offer further customization of this page. This may
> include the ability to show more items. I think this is preferable to
> a "classic view" option, which sets a bad precedent - that every time
> we make a UI chan
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Darin Fisher wrote:
> Do websites provide users with previous versions after overhauling their
> UX? Some do (gmail seems to), but most do not. You just get to surf the
> latest. Hopefully, the website changes for the better. That's our burden
> to bear.
I
Do websites provide users with previous versions after overhauling their UX?
Some do (gmail seems to), but most do not. You just get to surf the
latest. Hopefully, the website changes for the better. That's our burden
to bear.
-Darin
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Mike Belshe wrote:
> I j
We did test it in the lab, though we focused on new users who seemed to like
it. We also looked at stats which indicated that the Most visited and
Recently closed items were the only things that were actually used. The few
people who used Recent bookmarks and Searches have been vocal, but we know
t
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:04 PM, Ben Goodger (Google) wrote:
> One day, we may offer further customization of this page. This may
> include the ability to show more items. I think this is preferable to
> a "classic view" option, which sets a bad precedent - that every time
> we make a UI change we
Note that this mode will probably vanish, it's a figment of the transition.
-Ben
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:08 PM, Mohamed Mansour wrote:
> If you want to use the old new tab page, you can add this chrome switch (
> --old-new-tab-page )
> I personally like the 3x3 grid. I have a 24" screen and t
If you want to use the old new tab page, you can add this chrome
switch ( --old-new-tab-page
)
I personally like the 3x3 grid. I have a 24" screen and the new tab page is
so tiny, would of been nice if the user could fully customize it, that is
one of the popular features people want on the Chrome
One day, we may offer further customization of this page. This may
include the ability to show more items. I think this is preferable to
a "classic view" option, which sets a bad precedent - that every time
we make a UI change we'll carry the burden of supporting the old way
too forever. It adds t
18 matches
Mail list logo
