Pierre,
I agree.
I'd be very happy if the manuals had different words for different
meanings.
_Cursor_ for me is the mouse cursor.
If I had a glossary at the beginning of the manual I would have fight
less for understanding.
Thanks
Raffaella
On Sat, 2006-09-30 at 09:22 +0930, Pierre Marc
Thanks Pierre!
I've the pleasure of understanding in all my body!!
I'm using Cinelerra 2.0 CV (no idea of which SVN revision number).
It took me a while to get to the automation range, but at the end I got
there.
It was set to -1264.00 to 1392.00.
Now that I set it 0-100 everything in the video
Nicolas wrote:
On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 12:53:48AM +0200, Bernhard Fr?hmesser wrote:
...
The file is available at:
http://www.fruehmesserkeg.at.tf/images/Title.img
ERROR 404: Not Found.
=/
Weird, it´s there. When i click on the URL i get the download dialog in
Mozilla with the options
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 00:53:48 +0200, Bernhard Frühmesser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 01:55:04AM +0200, Herman Robak wrote:
Now, how about having a close look at the result, and figuring out what
the problem is? Then file bug reports. I would certainly like a more
Hi all!
With the aim to set the correct range for fade keyframes in audio tracks
I'm now struggling with audio levels.
On Internet I learned that we can hear from silence (0 Db) up to over
140 Db (a bomb).
So why to set the automation range from -80 to 6? Are these number
referred to Db?
What
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:14:14 +0200, Raffaella Traniello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
With the aim to set the correct range for fade keyframes in audio tracks
I'm now struggling with audio levels.
On Internet I learned that we can hear from silence (0 Db) up to over
140 Db (a bomb).
So
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Raffaella Traniello wrote:
On Internet I learned that we can hear from silence (0 Db) up to over
140 Db (a bomb).
So why to set the automation range from -80 to 6? Are these number
referred to Db?
The dB scale actually measures *ratios*, or differences in loudness, not
Huh,
depends on how you look at it. I personally like to be able to gain
above 100% (which results in the user needing to be wary of
wrap-around), but at the same time, I don't want it to saturate because
I know that for saturation, the following code:
value = value 255 ? 255 : value;
Raffaella,
I advise upgrading to the lastest SVN version.. In the older versions,
(prior to r898 , see http://cvs.cinelerra.org/svn_log.php) the
automation range was used the same for all automations, which didn't
make sense, (cause audio typical range is -40 - 6 dB, whilst video
generally
In
Cinelerra, there is a configuration setting for how low you want the level
meters to go.
I discoved that this is for the meter only, and the minimum that
cinelerra forces to -Inf dB is -40 dB!! See cinelerra/virtualanode.C
which contains:
if(fade_value = INFINITYGAIN) fade_value = 0;
Oops, I just realized that the video fade actually controls the opacity,
(alpha) and isn't really a gain as such. When the alpha goes to 101, it
wraps around and perfectly explains what the Raffaella saw (and I can
replicate). I have just applied a patch to fix this.
Pierre.
Pierre Marc
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 14:22:46 +0200, Pierre Marc Dumuid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh,
depends on how you look at it. I personally like to be able to gain
above 100% (which results in the user needing to be wary of
wrap-around), but at the same time, I don't want it to saturate because
I
On Saturday 30 September 2006 17:45, Pierre Marc Dumuid wrote:
Prior to discussions with j6t on IRC, I had been considering setting the
INFINITYGAIN as a property of the current project (thus 24 bit audio
freaks could specify huge attenuations). j6t advised against this
(micromanagement), but
On Sat, 2006-30-09 at 16:51 +0200, Herman Robak wrote:
Someone mentioned the fader did not completely mute the sound at
the lowest level; that would be a bug!
Forgive me if I say something that has already been said before, since I
have only just joined this list, but I have encountered this
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:45:23 +0200, Pierre Marc Dumuid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I discoved that this is for the meter only, and the minimum that
cinelerra forces to -Inf dB is -40 dB!! See cinelerra/virtualanode.C
which contains:
if(fade_value = INFINITYGAIN) fade_value = 0;
and
20*log10(2^24) = 144.5 dB
though if you consider that 1 bit is taken up for the sign (i.e. + or -
) then
20*log10(2^23) = 138.5 dB
( Note how 6 dB = 2x )
Pierre
Herman Robak wrote:
On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:45:23 +0200, Pierre Marc Dumuid
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I discoved that this is
http://bugs.cinelerra.org/show_bug.cgi?id=287
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-10-01 02:46 ---
Well, I don't think crashing is a normal behaviour for an application when
there's no more memory available on the system. Displaying an error message or
using swap would
17 matches
Mail list logo
