RE: DHCP on Access-Server - creative solution? [7:47697]

2002-06-29 Thread Daniel Cotts
Tell us about the end remote from the access-server. Is it: a) an Internet dial-up account? b) an Internet account with a fixed IP address? c) DSL or cable modem (always on)? What sort of equipment do you have at that site? a) PC? b) router? I assume that the ip assigned to the access-server is

Returned mail--30% Off Top 100 [7:47742]

2002-06-29 Thread postmaster
The following mail can't be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]: From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: 30% Off Top 100 The file is the original mail Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47742t=47742 -- FAQ,

Wireless with 22 MBit [7:47743]

2002-06-29 Thread Holger Eichhorn
Hallo, we want to connect to buildings over wireless with 22MBit. The target is: Connetion between 2 different wireless-lines to use 22MBit. The encryption is realised with IPSec (Pix-to-Pix). Etherchannel (command port group) bundled the 2 different wireless-lines to one line with 22MBit.

350-001 Expiry date [7:47744]

2002-06-29 Thread Zahid Hassan
Dear All, Does anyone have any information when this exam is planned to expire ? Its been already a while since the beta exam came out, so would be interesting to know when the beta exam 351-001 is going live. Many thanks, Zahid Message Posted at:

newCCNP test 640-605 [7:47745]

2002-06-29 Thread Yuri A. Korolenko
Hello! I need pass 640-605. Have anybody an experience of passing NEW test version (with simulation) - for example Switching? And what PRACTICAL difference with the old ver.? Thanks! -- Best regards, Yuri Korolenko e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at:

Looking for CCIE LAB partner [7:47746]

2002-06-29 Thread Firesox
Anyone in Boston area taking CCIE soon? I am looking for lab partner. I am taking CCIE R/S LAB in September. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47746t=47746 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: NDA violations (FW: New Legal Agreement--Cisco Career [7:47748]

2002-06-29 Thread Michael L. Williams
So it would appear that even saying how many questions, how much time, or what a passing score is would now be considered a violation of the NDA... whoa . . . (including, without limitation, questions, answers, worksheets, computations, drawings, diagrams, length and/or number of Exam

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread Michael L. Williams
I had heard that there was an RFC pertaining to using a /31 on Point-to-Point links only (in which case there is no need for a network/broadcast address). Has this been implemented in (Cisco) network equipment yet? Is the RFC complete? Anyone know? Priscilla? Howard? Mike W. Gaz wrote in

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread Michael L. Williams
I have successfully used both an all-zeros and an all-ones subnet on Windows 9x. (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.255.0/24) Works fine. Mike W. Kazan, Naim wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Ok, now that we know the answer to that question? Will windows support subnets 0-255.

Re: Re: extra hop [7:47625]

2002-06-29 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 9:47 PM -0400 6/28/02, Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Thank-you very much for going to that effort! Thanks to everyone who replied, in fact. I'm actually glad to hear that you can't reproduce the problem. It confirms my belief that something very strange is happening. Of course, it could easily

Replies not being grouped in threads? [7:47752]

2002-06-29 Thread Michael L. Williams
Recently it seems that replies aren't being grouped together under a common thread anymore (I checked the web forum and it's happening there as well (See threads Re: BGP synch question and Re: NDA violations (FW: New Legal Agreement--Cisco), so I know it's not just Outlook Express) I

RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread Brigitte Schoots
The RFC is 3021 ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3021.txt It is implemented on Cisco routers: http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122newft/122 t/122t2/ft31addr.htm Cheers, Willy Schoots -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread Michael L. Williams
Cool thanks for the info! Mike W. - Original Message - From: Brigitte Schoots To: Michael L. Williams ; Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 11:36 AM Subject: RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] The RFC is 3021 ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc3021.txt It is implemented on Cisco routers:

RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
Try configuring your machine(s) with addresses in the following networks: 198.62.0.0/28 - e.g. 192.168.0.1-14 and 192.168.0.240/28 - e.g. 192.168.0.241-254 This would be utilizing the all-zeros and all-ones subnets of 192.168.0.0/24 You tested configuring machines in the *networks*

RE: newCCNP test 640-605 [7:47745]

2002-06-29 Thread Mark Odette II
If you follow the Exam Outline found on CCO, and study all of the objectives thoroughly from that, you'll do just fine. As for the 605, it doesn't have exam simulations only the Routing and Remote Access exams have had simulations added to them. If you don't have access to Catalyst

Re: Replies not being quot;groupedquot; in threa [7:47752]

2002-06-29 Thread Brad Ellis
It's the mysterious groupstudy ghost (it also eats 75% of my posts too) ;) -Brad Michael L. Williams wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... Recently it seems that replies aren't being grouped together under a common thread anymore (I checked the web forum and it's

RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread R. Benjamin Kessler
To be more correct I should have said: Try configuring your machine(s) with addresses in the following subnets: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Benjamin Kessler Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 12:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread Mike Mandulak
I'm not really sure what your getting at here... If you configure a machine address to be 192.168.0.2/24 you are using subnet zero, whereas if you configure a machine with an address of 192.168.0.241-254/28 you are not. If you mean configure the PC with an address of 192.168.0.240/28 then that

Flash is set to read-only in hardware [7:47760]

2002-06-29 Thread G Chung
Hi! I recently bought some flash (16mb)for my cisco 2514. Everytime I try to copy a file to flash, it keep giving me the following error message. Accessing file 'c2500-js-l.122-7b.bin' on 10.100.100.30... Loading c2500-js-l.122-7b.bin from 10.100.100.30 (via Ethernet0): ! [OK] Device needs

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread Michael L. Williams
Gotcha... I'll try it and see how it goes... Mike W. - Original Message - From: R. Benjamin Kessler To: 'Michael L. Williams' ; Sent: Saturday, June 29, 2002 12:04 PM Subject: RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670] Try configuring your machine(s) with addresses in the following networks:

Re: Help on CISCO 827-4V [7:46836]

2002-06-29 Thread Brian
I cant help you with the voice part, but if u need an assist with reg 827 adsl config, I can likely help, i just did it for my own line. Bri On Mon, 17 Jun 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have 2 offices connectedby CISCO 827-4V and ADSL line. Telephone company

Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-29 Thread Oleg Oz
I wanted to drop a line to the group and thank everyone for adding thier 2 cents! I mean it! Having other folks point out potential issues/uses of a specific technology really helps fill in the picture. So Thanks again! I took the beta (351-001) exam at the beginging of May (have not

Re: IP Phones behind Checkpoint firewall [7:47739]

2002-06-29 Thread Tangled Up in Blue
I've natted plenty of ip phones behind a PIX. are you just talking about checkpoint? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47765t=47739 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: IP Phones behind Checkpoint firewall [7:47739]

2002-06-29 Thread Tangled Up in Blue
actually, i retract that statement. i've only successfully used ip phones with private ip's with gateways that have private ip's as well. i actually tried setting up an external gatekeeper/gw with natted ip phones, using conduit permits on the PIX for the RAS ports, etc. and actually had partial

Re: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
At 12:49 PM 6/29/02, Michael L. Williams wrote: I have successfully used both an all-zeros and an all-ones subnet on Windows 9x. (192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.255.0/24) Works fine. Those aren't subnets, though, since it's class C. Priscilla Mike W. Kazan, Naim wrote in message news:[EMAIL

RE: New Subnet Rule [7:47670]

2002-06-29 Thread lawrence sculark
192.168.152.0 255.255.255.128 my nt servers are at address 192.168.152.45-60 and 192.168.152.145-60 with subnet mask 128...the network is split into two remote locations and no routing problems...oh i am rounning eigrp as my routing protocol.. so in reference to your question yes nt 4 and 2k

Re: Flash is set to read-only in hardware [7:47760]

2002-06-29 Thread Brad Ellis
Most people would say it's your config-reg, but that's not the problem. Even though your config-reg is set to 0x2102, it's booting off the booroms (the (boot) in your prompt below). Your flash either has a corrupt image on it, a non-applicable image, or they are blank. Either case, your booting

RE: Flash is set to read-only in hardware [7:47760]

2002-06-29 Thread _ Einstooge _
Not A Problem, Since you are doing all the work yourself, I suggest you search cisco.com for all the Boot register settings. To write flash: Router(Config)#config-register 0x2101 - then reload. After reload, check to make sure (sh ver) last line should say 'Configuration register is 0x2101'

RE: Flash is set to read-only in hardware [7:47760]

2002-06-29 Thread _ Einstooge _
Brad is right, if your flash is bad, you will not be able to write to it. It may write a little or not at all, then fail. I also had this troiuble with a bad copy of ios (.bin) file that was corrupt. again, Later, M Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47769t=47760

RE: Passed CCIE written at Networkers in San Diego [7:47764]

2002-06-29 Thread Frank Merrill
Seemed like a much easier exam didn't it? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47771t=47764 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure

351-001 Beta Written Exam [7:47770]

2002-06-29 Thread Frank Merrill
Where is everyone who mentioned taking the Beta written a while back? Did you all get your pass/fail from Cisco/Prometric yet? I took it, and I realized afterward (duh!) that the test was almost entirely on the new subject material, none of which I did any study for. It makes sense, as why would

Re: IP Phones behind Checkpoint firewall [7:47739]

2002-06-29 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Is it because skinny, like h.323 hasa the iP address in the l7 packet as well? I don't know why one can't nat, but I have yet to sniff a skinny paket. STeve Tangled Up in Blue wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... actually, i retract that statement. i've only

Re: IP Phones behind Checkpoint firewall [7:47739]

2002-06-29 Thread Chuck
My first thought is that the proper TCP ports have not been opened. found this link on cco tac: http://www.cisco.com/warp/customer/788/AVVID/fix_1way_voice.html unfortunately, need a CCO account to view this one should get you in:

Off Topic - message post times off? [7:47774]

2002-06-29 Thread Chuck
My recent post has a timestamp of 9:11 p.m. It was posted within 30 seconds of my hitting the send button. local time on my pc was 20:34. I synch my PC clock to the USNO, using SNTP, so I am confident that my PC, not to mention several other operating clocks in my office are accurate. Anyone

RE: Cat 5000 Problems [7:47775]

2002-06-29 Thread Mark Odette II
Omer, I appreciate the compliment of asking me directly for assistance, rather than through groupstudy.com (if in fact that is where you got my e-mail address from), but I will have to defer you to the list, or to contacting Cisco TAC for further assistance. For the benefit of groupstudy, I've