AFAIK there is no special interaction between SRM and HSRP.
You might want to use the 'standby preempt delay ' feature
to be sure that routing protocols have converged before the router
is taking over hsrp active router functionality.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/619/hsrpguide4.shtmlT
hth
Don't worry about the IP address. The command you had was correct. Why do
you ask?
--
RFC 1149 Compliant.
MK wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
How can I configure PortSecurity based on MAc-Address and
IP-Address. I only know about switchport port-security
Hey Richard,
I am about to purchase ur book but just one quick question: Did u cover any
details regarding multiple interfaces configuration examples like 0,100,99
and 70. Thanks
Shahid
Richard Deal wrote:Mark,
Actually, Mark, I'm one step ahead of you :-). My PIX book came out at the
end of
All,
Please can someone confirm a small point for me.
Process switching
Packet comes in from an interface and the interface places this packet in
memory (SRAM).
Packet then gets placed in DRAM, does a routing table lookup and gets
forwarded based on the routing table.
Fast Switching
Packet
Because there must be a way, and I was asked about it in our
Company. I know there is some secret behind !
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im Auftrag von
Steven A. Ridder
Gesendet: Samstag, 30. November 2002 13:42
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, just do the mac address. That's what they're looking for. Then limit
it to 1, because the default is 150.
On another note, what does the AW in the subject line (RE: in English)stand
for in German? I used to live in y and I can't think of the word...
MK wrote in message
[EMAIL
Take a look at knowledgenet.com. They have some pretty good training.
Kazan, Naim wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am interested in purchasing CBT's for my Cisco security certifications.
I
was just curious of your opinions on learnkey product for the PIX, VPN ,
MK wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Because there must be a way, and I was asked about it in our
Company. I know there is some secret behind !
-Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Im Auftrag von
Steven A. Ridder
I was curious about what Job Descriptions people use. On my card it says
Network Engineer but I do much more than that. I design and implement
networks for the DoD, my duties include:
Network Design
Network Engineering
Device Configuration
Information Systems
VoIP Video Architectures
Server
Hi All,
Remember on a cat 5000 when you used to use set mulicast router 2/3 to
indicate where a mulicast source was.
Well,
I've been searching for the same functionality on a 3550 - and cannot find
it.
Anyone know if you can do this rather than having to using igmp snooping.
Regards
Richard
Have you taken anything from them, NetEng? The concept is VERY cool but I've
never heard of them (not that I know everything about everything but I do
try to keep up on affordable training options available). Just makes me
wonder what the training is like. I see several schools that I'd like to
Hi all
I am facing a problem in configuring the G.SHDSL. When i give show int atm,
the line is down and protocol is down. this means there should be some
problems in the cable. but i changed the cables with the new one which i
took it from the working setup, still the line is down and protocol is
hi
addition to the previous mail, i am getting this line
GSHDSL-6-ACTIVATION: Interface ATM0, the line is still not activated.
Could anybody tell me what could be the problem.
Regards
Deepak
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58337t=58336
Thanks for the comments. Some thoughts below.
Peter van Oene wrote:
Went back and read through some of the relevant parts of
the RFC. I believe there is no routing loop issue if an ABR
was to consider summary LSAs received from non-zero areas.
(where consider means install routes
I see only a limit within the hole system and that is 128. If I
configure switchport port-security maximum 1 It does'nt show up in the
config so it is default. Am I right ??
regards
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58339t=58339
On Sat, 2002-11-30 at 12:52, p b wrote:
Thanks for the comments. Some thoughts below.
Peter van Oene wrote:
Went back and read through some of the relevant parts of
the RFC. I believe there is no routing loop issue if an ABR
was to consider summary LSAs received from non-zero
Eric, Reinhold,
Thank you. It makes sense that if the non-DR MSFC doesn't maintain a
routing table (which it apparently doesn't), the standby HSRP router would
need to handle traffic for at least a brief while. Delaying the preempt on
the non-DR sounds like a wise move. Or maybe not using
simple question.
want to write an ACL:
access-list 100 permit ip 209.145.96.0 0.0.3.255 any
just to make sure Ive got my bits right this will cover:
209.145.96.0/24
209.145.97.0/24
Is that right?
Thanks,
Keith
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58341t=58341
Keith Woodworth wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
simple question.
want to write an ACL:
access-list 100 permit ip 209.145.96.0 0.0.3.255 any
just to make sure Ive got my bits right this will cover:
209.145.96.0/24
209.145.97.0/24
the 3 in the third octet
Hi everybody
Im looking for a short study materials(free) something like the old
cramsession for cisco 640-901 and 640-606. (last minute study notes or
something)
Joupin
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58344t=58344
On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, The Long and Winding Road wrote:
|- access-list 100 permit ip 209.145.96.0 0.0.3.255 any
|-
|- just to make sure Ive got my bits right this will cover:
|-
|- 209.145.96.0/24
|- 209.145.97.0/24
|-
|-
|-the 3 in the third octet is 11 in binary. 11 ( binary) covers what
decimal
It has nothing to do with N.O.S; it has to do with what the MANUFACTURER
of the NIC produces for DRIVERS on a given platform!
... and as far as I know, if it is supported on *nix, it definitely is
supported on M$. The CHIPSET of the NIC depicts what type of VLAN
support is provided- NOT THE
Hi,
96(base10) = 0110(base2)
97(base10) = 0111(base2)
So the quick and short answer is yes it does cover those 2, but
0.0.1.255 with the same network address would cover just those 2.
Regards
Gerhard
-Original Message-
From: The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Would someone provide references to training materials/books/practice exams
for Cisco IP Telephony Support Specialist and Cisco Wireless LAN Support
Specialist. Thanks much.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58348t=58348
Does the csim start command only work with VoIP, or does it also work
with VoFR and VoATM?
I would appreciate any insight in using this command! Also is it feasible to
have two POTS dial peers on the same router, call each other?
Thanks, Jason
Message Posted at:
Hello group, I was wondering about the following question:
Is worth to implement VLANs and L3-switching instead a flat L2-network?
I know that this question has been discussed here several times, but the
answer is always the same: depends. What I would like to know is if sombody
has implemented a
I see what you mean.
Deepak Nagarajachary wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi
I think the csu/dsu is not integrated. could you please check this link.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/access/acs_mod/cis2600/hw_in
st/nm_inst/nm-doc/conntpri.htm
check this out.
R10
--
Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Address Interface
222.222.222.7 1 FULL/DR 00:01:58149.22.4.7 Serial0
222.222.222.111 FULL/DR 00:00:38149.22.252.2Ethernet0
Router_10#
interface Serial0
ip address
It would seem you wanted to use md5 authentication but you used
plain text authentication keys. In this situation - when there are no md5
authentication keys specified - I think the routers will use null key,
meaning
no authentication will take place...
The Long and Winding Road wrote in
Hi Chuck,
Yep what you see is right. :-) I was seriously scratching my head
first time i saw this too... i was using 12.2(6.8)T interim code.. are
you using 12.1(17)?
Cheers,
Mark
-Original Message-
From: The Long and Winding Road
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November
Vicuna, Mark would like to recall the message, Last Minute Thought -
OSPF authentication issue? [7:58352].
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58355t=58355
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
Hi,
I tried this too. I am pasting the results.
R5#
interface Serial0/2
ip address 192.168.1.209 255.255.255.252
ip ospf authentication
ip ospf authentication-key cisco
router ospf 10
log-adjacency-changes
area 0 authentication
network 30.30.30.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 192.168.1.208
I am not sure about your scenario. But I can give you a link to check the
configuration...maybe you have already gone through this.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/794/index.shtml
try this..
Silju
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58357t=58336
Silju Pillai wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hi,
I tried this too. I am pasting the results.
R5#
interface Serial0/2
ip address 192.168.1.209 255.255.255.252
ip ospf authentication
ip ospf authentication-key cisco
router ospf 10
log-adjacency-changes
the debug ntp packets command shows packets sent and received with different
modes. What are these modes? can some one explain?
R5-2503#
Mar 6 02:42:08.879: NTP: rcv packet from 10.10.10.1 to 10.10.10.2 on BRI0:
Mar 6 02:42:08.883: leap 0, mode 2, version 3, stratum 8, ppoll 64
Mar 6
35 matches
Mail list logo
