RE: PIX question [7:58623]

2002-12-05 Thread Brunner Joseph
I don't think the Alias command or the DNAT tricks work for the Same Interface Routing rule, which the Pix won't do. Sorry Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58628t=58623 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: Weather woes in RTP [7:58638]

2002-12-05 Thread Brunner Joseph
No problem. Just plug the lights into the Cat6K with In-Line Power. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=58641t=58638 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

RE: Procurve vs. Catalyst [7:58225]

2002-11-27 Thread Brunner Joseph
Another point, in a big network how does HP match Backbonefast Uplinkfast PVLANning In a big network, these things are VERY important, and I think they are cisco proprietary ? Can someone please comment, on STP tweaks that can be done with HP (any stp ieee compliant switch) to equal what cisco

RE: Block MSN Messenger [7:57595]

2002-11-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
I have seen just blocking 1863/TCP kills this monstrosity.. However I prefer routing all the blocks MSN allocates for the program to NULL 0 ip route 207.46.106.0 255.255.255.0 null0 ip route 207.68.171.0 255.255.255.0 null0 You will find others once these are killed, just keep looking for

RE: PIX site-to-site VPN question... [7:57648]

2002-11-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
You should use private addressing behind the pix and use static's from the /29 to map to Servers, etc. behind the pix. Why would you ever want to put public ip's behind a pix ? especially for a vpn ? Not cool. It makes it an easier target to spoof, as apposed to RFC1918 addresses. Answering your

RE: PIX site-to-site VPN question... [7:57648]

2002-11-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
In-Line... Perfect... very interesting, indeed. I have long wondered about this scenario, and have wondered how companies are implementing their site-to-site VPN's over the internet. so you're saying (regarding your own roll out), that your ISP assigned you two address spaces and routed your

RE: IPSec Manual and SPI question [7:57448]

2002-11-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
I think your confusing SPI with a CBAC technology. AN spi is a uni-directional IPSEC peer transform set hash (agreement on what your using with your IPSEC PEER). An SPI is made in each direction to each peer. The Access-list permits flag traffic (matched by the router) as permitted for IPSEC.

RE: OT: Pix515 memories and 16MB Flash available for [7:57239]

2002-11-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
4 pieces of 32MB of memory (128MB total) for the Pix515 JUST AN FYI- the PIX 515 has two DIMM slots and guess what ALMOST any ram (except ddr, or rdram) that will fit with the chasis closed (like the narrow sticks) will work inside.. look at my home lab pixie. (i could have done 512MB, but only

RE: OT: Good webhosting company [7:53651]

2002-09-19 Thread Brunner Joseph
personally i swear by service www.internetconnection.net they have always had great pipes, with lowpings, and I have hosted two adult sites there since 1999. I am currently moving my new site, www.networkedfilms.com there by the end of the month, from register.com. They offer all the features

RE: Trafic Shaping [7:51661]

2002-08-19 Thread Brunner Joseph
you can block kazaa, etc with a simple access list.. all those fast track network front end clients (kazaa, grokster, etc) work on tcp/1214 so for me it would be access-list 101 deny tcp any any eq 1214 access-list 101 permit ip any any keep adding access-list 101 deny * * eq as you find

RE: BGP Full/Partial tables question [7:50382]

2002-08-01 Thread Brunner Joseph
why don't you just cut the 3640 a break.. take defaults from both providers, (since you said your outbound loadbalancing is being done at the firewall) the only reason to take full, partial, or default routes is to determine your outbound (egress) load balancing.. which ever you take makes no

Broadcast Mac Address ? [7:48694]

2002-07-12 Thread Brunner Joseph
03-bf-ac-10-32-1d What makes this mac address broadcast (at layer 2) ? Its used by MS TERM SERVER. I searched on google before posting here, but all I could find out was some common ranges of broadcast mac addresses, and the vendor code for the first part of this mac. I was looking for a

RE: question to CCIEs [7:48507]

2002-07-10 Thread Brunner Joseph
51K to 75K in Marietta Georgia is like $150K in NYC. I make more than 75K (with no CCIE), and I probably live worse than someone living in GA making 40K (no car, tiny apartment, etc). 51K is my rent... (close). So, until that ad says NYC, SF, SJ CA, Relax ! Message Posted at:

RE: OT - Mega, Kilo etc [7:46940]

2002-06-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
i dont think ISP's care about the BYTES part of it. their services are sold in bits (as you know 1/8 of a byte) the difference in 1024 (power of 2) and the 1000Mbps is so insignificant,, like once a teacher i had said its like arguing which one of us is closer to japan. and even though its not

RE: Combining T1's into one pipe [7:46942]

2002-06-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
its definately worth it.. combine multiple pipes at layer 2. I use MLPPP with my ISP and it rocks.. forget all those shaky stupid CEF and PER-PACKET configurations.. if you can get PPP going between your carrier and you, you can get it all going to one router on their side, then you should run

RE: VPN connection from local lan to wireless lan [7:46916]

2002-06-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
try funky MTU settings.. also if your using the AERONET solution let them worry about it.. open a tac case.. this product is supposed to deliver lan quality connections over wireless.. the medium should not matter here.. i have connected to the vpn 3015 from cable, dsl, t-1, dialup, almost

RE: Combining T1's into one pipe [7:46942]

2002-06-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
Yes I would use mlppp and ios in the same sentence, as I have been running it without a hitch on a 7200 for 6 months. also, you guys are missing his point (t-1's to the internet) what ISP is going to run OSPF or EIGRP with a customer ? please. Maybe, if they managed the router, but he didnt say

RE: Combining T1's into one pipe [7:46942]

2002-06-18 Thread Brunner Joseph
true- cef if the best for most situations, certainly at the 7500 and gsr levels where mlppp is a joke.. i m just saying for 2600 with 2 t's, also i have experienced lots of cef problems with NAT, which you would normally do on a little 2600. mlppp for me has not had these issues.. but i agree if

RE: 3550 alternatives? [7:46510]

2002-06-13 Thread Brunner Joseph
I dont think so. this can do anything the 2948G_L3 (wire speed layer 3, etc) and it has the killer layer 2 stuff we all love ! For the price, this thing rocks! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=46515t=46510 -- FAQ,

RE: VPN problem from Pix to VPN concentrator 3030 [7:46343]

2002-06-12 Thread Brunner Joseph
on the 3030 make sure you are manually specifying lan to lan (Local Network and Remote Network) using USE IP ADDRESS/WILDCARD MASK BELOW). While you normally don't have to do this (you can autodiscover) Just do it to test if this is the problem. Also make sure you have both isakmp enable

RE: PIX525\Web Sense and Chat programs [7:46013]

2002-06-07 Thread Brunner Joseph
forget the stupid attempts to block 5190/tcp, etc.. its best to completly route to null or deny traffic to the subnets involved. (smarter users will just specify to use 80 / tcp, and still get on) read this from a story about this.. As of 1:22 PM 11/21/2001 Login server names - set up a Deny

Re: Booo! CSS1 [7:45498]

2002-05-31 Thread Brunner Joseph
Yes well said thomas. If I had just relied on his ccna book 2 years ago, I would have failed 640-507 (CCNA). I found so many errors and things out of order (as a baby engineer). I ended up just reading the miserable, poorly written odom book from cisco press. I threw that piece of junk away, when

RE: Question on Pix and lossing internet conectivity [7:45465]

2002-05-30 Thread Brunner Joseph
i had the same problem; it has nothing to do with 5 c classes of ip or in my case 1 IP on the outside for X number of internal users. Either something is wrong with the pix 6.2 Code, or it has very aggressive timeouts. Some of the problems you will see are short time outs on downloads, AIM dying

RE: Bandwidth Throttling [7:45354]

2002-05-29 Thread Brunner Joseph
use traffic shaping. low overhead, easy to configure. see http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/policevsshape.html#traffic Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=45357t=45354 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: Fast Ether Channel [7:45271]

2002-05-28 Thread Brunner Joseph
tested it.. works on 3548XL but not on 7206VXR (command was not under int e4/0). On the 3548XL I just set hardcode 10, so it must be in the hardware !3548XL ! interface FastEthernet0/1 speed 10 port group 3 spanning-tree portfast ! interface FastEthernet0/2 speed 10 port group 3

RE: SYSLOG time stamp problem [7:44949]

2002-05-24 Thread Brunner Joseph
set ntp client enable set ntp server 10.0.1.1 set ntp server 10.0.1.2 set timezone EST -5 0 set summertime enable Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44955t=44949 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: SYSLOG time stamp problem [7:44949]

2002-05-24 Thread Brunner Joseph
you need to add logging facilites for messages in the syslog.conf file in /etc/ research setting up syslog.conf on google. also do a netstat -na you should see /home/jbrunner as root@ns netstat -na Active Internet connections (servers and established) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address

RE: NBMA SVC problem [7:44529]

2002-05-20 Thread Brunner Joseph
aren't SVC demand Circuits (use goes up, price goes up) that would be the problem doyle is referring to. instead of multicasts act like NBMA topology. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44543t=44529 -- FAQ, list

RE: SPAN, Port mirroring on 2948G-L3 [7:44538]

2002-05-20 Thread Brunner Joseph
it does not. even if you put the span port in the same bridge group as the firewall's port, it still acts like a switch, a seperate collision domain between each port and node. why not just put the fw on a hub, and the monitoring station on the hub. And connect the hub to the 2648G_L3 ?

RE: SPAN, Port mirroring on 2948G-L3 [7:44538]

2002-05-20 Thread Brunner Joseph
2948-L3-1(config-if)#rmon ? native Monitor the interface in native mode promiscuous Monitor the interface in promiscuous mode Off hours, im going to do some tests for you, with the device, these commands and traffic director, and sniffer. I will let you know. From Cisco's site and

RE: VLAN Load balancing [7:43265]

2002-05-04 Thread Brunner Joseph
Do mean if I have 2 6509 with MSFC2/PFC2's, I configure STP for say odd vlans to go to the first MSFC and EVEN VLAN's to the SECOND MSFC ? This is done all the time.. read up on MISTP on cco. Basically you map vlans to instances of spanning tree protocol also you can use the older way of setting

Upgrade Local Director 416 [7:43284]

2002-05-03 Thread Brunner Joseph
This is supposedly what it runs @ Local Director 416 Hardware: _ Three 10/100BaseT interface cards 32 MB of RAM 2 MB of flash memory 300 MHz processor DB-9 EIA/TIA-323 console interface port 3.5-inch diskette drive 19-inch rack-mount enclosure Performance: 8000 virtual and real IP

RE: OT: Using a Router to redirect IP traffic [7:42217]

2002-04-22 Thread Brunner Joseph
This is what I would do in your situation.. -Listing what i have to do to keep the boss happy and save money for your firm. 1. Keep old IP's at the old datacenter, hitting live servers at the new datacenter 2. Prevent the need to a second set of servers with DNS entries seperate from the