oblems. Or you could
stop being a cheapskate and buy a real firewall to do the job. :->
--
-----
Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out of my hat!
Rocky: Bullwinkle, that trick NEVER works
Bullwinkle: This time FOR SURE!!!
"&quo
""MADMAN"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The big thing to watch out for is line card support. Most OSM cards
> are only supported in Native mode and the inverse is true with many
> voice modules. I can't think of any other operational differances that
> would make me lean to one meth
summarization comes to mind. So does secondary addressing, GRE tunnels, and
other exercises in convolution.
--
-
Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out of my hat!
Rocky: Bullwinkle, that trick NEVER works
Bullwinkle: This time FOR
unless the peers are on the same segment, you also need the neighbor
ebgp-multihop command configured on both routers.
HTH
--
-
Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out of my hat!
Rocky: Bullwinkle, that trick NEVER works
Bullwinkle
to construct
HTH
--
-
Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out of my hat!
Rocky: Bullwinkle, that trick NEVER works
Bullwinkle: This time FOR SURE!!!
( pulls snarling Proctor out of hat )
No doubt about it. I gotta get me a new
agree?
--
-----
Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out of my hat!
Rocky: Bullwinkle, that trick NEVER works....
Bullwinkle: This time FOR SURE!!!
( pulls snarling Proctor out of hat )
No doubt about it. I gotta get me a new hat!
""Salvatore De Luca"
In the past I have been less than enthusiastic about the 65xx platform, but
with the release of the new sup and the new cards, I can offer my uninformed
opinion that Cisco has got this one right, much to the chagrin of Foundry
and Extreme.
--
-----
Bullwink
generating the "next-hop-self" command.
However, if the spokes know eachother because of proper dlci mapping, static
routes, whatever, then next-hop self is irrelevant.
Pretty much it?
--
-----
Bullwinkle: Hey, Rocky, watch me pull a CCIE out o
8 matches
Mail list logo
