/kentrox DataSMART T3/E3 [7:73129]
Jablonski, Michael wrote:
Has anyone had any experience w/the following combination?
3640 NM-1HSSI Kentrox DataSMART T3/E3 IDSU
I've been trying, to no avail, to bring the HSSI up for a 12M
DS3 The
CSU/DSU, according to the lights, is ready to send
Resolved!!! Turns out our equipment provider sent us the wrong cable
They sent the HSSI Null Modem cable (CAB-HNUL) and not the CAB-HSI1!
Thanks for everyone's insight.
Cheers,
MKJ
-Original Message-
From: Jablonski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003
Has anyone had any experience w/the following combination?
3640 NM-1HSSI Kentrox DataSMART T3/E3 IDSU
I've been trying, to no avail, to bring the HSSI up for a 12M DS3 The
CSU/DSU, according to the lights, is ready to send and receive data; but
when I bring up the int on the router, it
I'm having a bit of trouble with extended access-lists for vty access.
Basically I'd like to setup an extended access list that only allows ssh
access from certain IPs, but after creating the list and applying it to the
VTY I lose access. But if I use a standard acl only allowing certain IPs it
Use ip unnumbered on the WAN interface to the Ethernet. Assign the Ether a
legal and the PIX a legal and use the rest to your liking...
That's how I setup my home connection; works great!
-Original Message-
From: Bikespace [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:52 PM
Does anyone know any retailer carrying cisco's vpn client (CVPN-CLNT-35-K9)
in stock? Key word is, in stock... quickest I see it available is 2+
weeks.
Thanx,
mikej
~~~
Michael Jablonski
ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc.
161 North Clark St.
9th Flr
Chicago,
:44749]
Oh yeah I'm running PIX 6.1(2)
-Original Message-
From: Jablonski, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:35 PM
To: 'Cisco Study List (E-mail)'
Subject: PIX 515E routing issue
Just recently installed a PIX 515E. I can ping from the PIX to an outside
address (and inside box
Just recently installed a PIX 515E. I can ping from the PIX to an outside
address (and inside box to ethernet on PIX); but trying to ping through the
PIX comes back as unreachable. Basic layout as follows:
Netopia DSL Router -- PIX 515E-- LAN
I'm using the default
Is it possible to get the ADSL WIC running on a 1600 router?
~~~
Michael Jablonski
ABN AMRO Asset Management Holdings, Inc.
161 North Clark St.
9th Flr
Chicago, IL 60601-2468
PH: 312.884.2996
FAX: 312.278.5550
~~~
: Monday, May 13, 2002 11:41 AM
To: 'Jablonski, Michael'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL - WIC 1600 [7:44042]
I just did a quick look on Cisco's price list. That module is not listed for
the 1600 but is for the 1700.
-Original Message-
From: Jablonski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL
Ellis
CCIE#5796 (RS / Security)
Network Learning Inc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.optsys.net (Cisco hardware)
Jablonski, Michael wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I'm trying to configure ethernet 2-4 on a PIX 501 (3DES), but it comes
back
saying only 2 interfaces ar
I'm trying to configure ethernet 2-4 on a PIX 501 (3DES), but it comes back
saying only 2 interfaces are active. When I do a show version it say
maximum interfaces: 2 Am I missing something or what? Please lemme
know!!!
Thanx,
mkj
~~~
Michael Jablonski
ABN AMRO
utilized.
~-Original Message-
~From: Jablonski, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
~Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 5:49 PM
~To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
~Subject: BGP Load Balancing Question [7:42469]
~
~
~I am experiencing a similar problem, using one provider with two T1s.
~Utilization appears
Inbound/Outbound loads are out of wack what part of the BGP neigh stats
do you want to see?
Serial0/0 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is QUICC with integrated T1 CSU/DSU
Description: To provider1
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1536 Kbit, DLY 2 usec, rely 255/255, load 5/255
Same routes via both connections. this is our border router, no other
routing on the inside.. We're probably receiving default routes.
BGP router identifier 65.196.X.X, local AS number 7046
BGP table version is 3, main routing table version 3
2 network entries and 2 paths using 242 bytes of
I am experiencing a similar problem, using one provider with two T1s.
Utilization appears to significantly favor one interface over the other. I
realize there will be some variation, but considering its a discrepancy of
75% vs. 3% (these are numbers from our provider) I've talked to the
A customer, using a PIX 515, is experiencing trouble loading an asp page.
Is there a setting/problem in PIX that would cause an asp page to load much
slower than normal html sites?
thanx,
mike j.
This message (including
17 matches
Mail list logo
