This Sunday has been quiet on the list. In fact most days are quiet on this
list these days. This brings to mind a question I have had for a while. If
anyone has anything on this I would appreciate hearing from you. The
question is, in this down book market how many copies do the books published
Are they concerned about what is in the traffic going back and forth
from the wireless users to the wired network? In other words
interception of the signal. Or is it a desire to isolate the wireless
from the wired side of the network. If isolation is what is needed, it
would seem a lot easier to
Interesting. I have used both products as well and I found the
interface, filter, and capture functions to be just the opposite. In
that the EtherPeek filters and capture seemed counterintuitive, whereas
Sniffer was obvious. The Sniffer interface seems to have things exactly
where I expect them to
RJ-45 and RJ-48 as used for a T1 circuit are effectively the same. As
long as the distance is not too great from the demarc to the router, Cat
5 UTP cable can be used. For long distances, shielded UTP is called for.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
In my studies for the Cisco wireless test I keep running across the term
RSSI - Received Signal Strength Indicator. Is this something different from
just the signal strength in dBms as shown by most utility programs? For
example in the site monitor part of the Orinoco Gold card it shows the
signal
While reading Priscilla's book on Campus Area Network Troubleshooting, which
is an excellent book that I highly recommend, it and other sources state
that the Packet Error Rate should be measured for a WLAN. The problem is I
cannot find anything at a reasonable price to use to measure such a thing
Could you contact me off list please. It is concerning adopting your book on
campus networks for a course I teach.
Ken Chipps
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=61647t=61647
--
FAQ, list archives
than
I will provide
a definitive answer, I'm sure.
Ken Chipps wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am using a sample configuration from cisco that looks like this
First command config t
Second command ip routing
Third command interface
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 3:22 PM
To: 'Ken Chipps'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]
You said that you got the sample configuration from cisco. Do you have
the link?
I would like to look at something. My router supports both
, qsaal, and all the atm
adaptation layer
protocols.
Something else to look at!
-Original Message-
From: Ken Chipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]
Thanks
I will try this on Friday evening and let you know if it works.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Angel Leiva
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]
Thank
I am attempting to setup a PVC between two Cisco 3640 Routers connected back
to back. The interface is an OC3 card. Whenever I issue the PVC command on
the ATM interface it says a PVC is not supported. If I use the ? to see for
supported commands for the interface, no PVC command is listed. Is
interfaces.
-Original Message-
From: Ken Chipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 1:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cisco 3640 Router ATM PVC Problem [7:61077]
I am attempting to setup a PVC between two Cisco 3640 Routers connected
back
to back. The interface
We have three 8510 MSRs in a lab environment, that we will be using
beginning in a few weeks. What kind of problems are you having?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody;groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Ellis, Andrew
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:25 PM
To: [EMAIL
I like pdf format myself. I often print out a few pages or a chapter to
study from. Then I can highlight different parts for different areas of
study. This avoids messing up the original book. I have done this may times
with the Lanmmle books, all of which I paid for myself. In fact, I am doing
As I recall from the old days of using Token Ring there was some reaaon you
could not just make these. You have to buy them already made. Something to
do with the circuitry. I can look in my Token Ring stuff, after I blow off
the dust, if anyone really wants to know. Assuming I am remembering
One, unless early token release is in effect. Assuming I am remembering
my old Token Ring stuff right.
Tim Metz wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
While doing some token ring reading I realized that I have no idea how
many
tokens can be on the ring at one time.
I have been reading up on how to configure ATM on Cisco equipment. In
particular I have been looking at examples of how ATM is used in a campus
network, such as to connect two buildings. The Cisco documents for the 8510
MSR for example discuss configuration using LANE clients, MPOA, Classical
IP,
s:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Hopefully none!!!
ATM is mostly dead in the LAN with the advent of 100/1000M ethernet
and 10G starting to trickle out.
I know someone will point out and exception but it will be the
exception not the rule.
Just say no!! to LANE
Dave
Ken Chipps wrote:
I h
I ran into the same problem. So I put this together to document what I
found through trail and error and the few books on the subject.
Look it over and tell me what you think.
The link is www.chipps.com/Firewall.ppt
This is a PowerPoint file.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try this list. It is extracted from a PowerPoint presentation, which is why
the formatting is odd looking. http://www.chipps.com/Periodicals.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 10:31 AM
To: [EMAIL
I am confused about which Ethernet frame type everyone uses with TCP/IP
today. I understand that there are four different types. I see from the
Cisco website that they talk about only two of these four. The two they
discuss are called Ethernet and IEEE 802.3. The one Cisco calls Ethernet has
the
DeVry offers a degree in Telecommunications Management. Look here for more
information http://www.devry.edu/f_acad_prog.html Watch the URL those are
underlines in what look like spaces.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
jay smith
Sent:
These things are called media filters. You need one that goes from a data
connector to RJ45 connector. This sort plugs into the MAU. There is another
type that plugs into the DB9 connector on the NIC. I looked around for you,
but could only find the ones that go on the NIC, not any that go on the
A U is 1.75 inches high. The 2500 is about 1U.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Dennis
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 9:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: equipment rack
question:
an ad for an equipment rack states that it is 20U.
To Daniel
Yes, from further research I believe it does have more to do the way the
connector is wired and then used rather than the physical shape and size of
the connector.
To Howard
When I saw it in the CFR, I thought that it must relate back to the
Carterphone decision and all of the
Any 10BaseT type Ethernet connection between any two devices without the use
of a hub requires a crossover cable.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Roman
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2000 1:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Stupid question..
On
any architecture or topology you must consider the logical layout and the
physical layout. Ethernet is logically a bus. Token Ring is logically a ring.
Ethernet is physically a bus - as in 10Base5 and 10Base2 - or a star - as in
10BaseT. The bus arrangement of Ethernet
28 matches
Mail list logo
