RE: Cisco Switches with Stonebeat [7:69505]

Bikespace, Just spent a day testing exactly this...spooky You're correct , Cisco's cannot put a multicast mac in its arp cache dynamically - BUT - you CAN put STATIC ARP entries in a Cisco pointing to a multicast mac.( Even if Layer3 is unicast) However there are some small perfomance points

RE: PIX Firewall 6.2.2 Inside network can not reac [7:69779]

Charles/Mark, No infinate wisdom i'm afraid - just my £0.2. Is it because the statements below effectively do nothing due to the fact the statement 2 undoes what statement one has just done ? [or have i missed the point.] 1)alias (inside) SERVERA_DMZ SERVERA_OUTSIDE 255.255.255.255 2)alias

RE: Documention CD's [7:63940]

Just replace 'expired' with 'home' in the url HTH Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=63960t=63940 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

LAB 0 RICHARD 1 - CCIE#10808 [7:58745]

All, I've been waiting to write this for a long time now. I finally made it, got back from Brussels last night, dialled up this morning and there it was #10808. WOW My sincere thanks go to all who have helped me along the way. I must however mention the likes of Marc Russell, Chuck (The long

3550 Mulicast [7:58334]

Hi All, Remember on a cat 5000 when you used to use set mulicast router 2/3 to indicate where a mulicast source was. Well, I've been searching for the same functionality on a 3550 - and cannot find it. Anyone know if you can do this rather than having to using igmp snooping. Regards Richard

RE: OSPF Filtering [7:57789]

Sanjay, I don't think you can do this. I understand that you can filter ospf routes inbound on an interface to stop the routes getting into the routing table, BUT NOT getting into the ospf Database. Hence you will have to filter on each downstream router to stop the the route from being

RE: Einstooge is now CCIE#10543 [7:56125]

Top Dollar Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=56154t=56125 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to

RE: nat problem [7:55537]

Hi, Looking at this, there appears to be no dynamic routing happening. The gateway of last resort is on a different network than E0/0 and E0/1. Can you actually reach 10.1.255.254 by any other means ? Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55542t=55537

RE: ip ospf demand-circuit?? [7:55501]

Hi, The answer is NO, you don't need to deny ospf as interesting traffic in the ACL. In fact , having read rfc 1793 (http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1793.txt)which explains demand ccts and I think that by doing this you will break the demand cct feature. OSPF requires that initially the database

Re: nat problem [7:55537]

Robert, Apologies - comes from reading too quickly :) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=55564t=55537 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

CCO - Online Lab Scheduling Error [7:54244]

All, Just received this when trying to request a lab seat at Brussels ERROR: The 'Available Lab Seats' activity limit for the candidate has been exceeded for today. Please try again tomorrow. So if you're constantly trying to find a seat early, ie: before November - don't try too hard..

RE: voip [7:51729]

Jake, Have a look at the busy-out monitor command.This basically tracks an interface - I don't think that this will monitor unreachable networks or next hop ip addresses HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=51731t=51729

RE: bandwidth question [7:49002]

Birdy, What about the interface buffer that has to cope with buffering the packets. Just because you've got 100k left to deal with it doesn't necessarily mean that the router can HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=49003t=49002

RE: bandwidth in serial interface [7:48481]

Deepak, The bandwidth statement only serves to inform the routing protocol (depending on the protocol of course!) as to the real bandwidth of the interface - ie - what is the clock-rate - how many bits per second can the interface shift! This way the routing protocol knows which is the better

Re: BGP community Q [7:48132]

Annu, I was just looking at this. Just my thoughts but... Should the communities be added based on what you receive from router 10 rather than what you send to router 11. I think this has something to do with the way the router a re manipulated by the Input Policy engine. Looking at Halabi's book

RE: Ip Address Negotiated command [7:47546]

Sandeep, Depending on your config then yes. ( I would have though it would be the otehr way around - many bri's dialing into a pri and the bri's getting their ip addresses ?) Look at this link http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/471/ddreasyip.html HTH Richard Message Posted at:

Re: Lab comming Frakin' out here [7:47055]

I Know the feeling... The only way I tried to get around this was to make a very honest list of what terrified me and then learn that stuff. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=47087t=47055 -- FAQ, list archives, and

RE: dlsw+ bet/ an enet rtr t/r rtr [7:46896]

Timur, Firstly, the source-bridge transparent is only needed when you have a router with both Token ring and ethernet interfaces Secondly, the source-bridge ring-group 500 command on the router with no token ring interfaces will do nothing - You are transparently bridging on this router!

RE: set password problem [7:44702]

Stuart, You can press enter during the 1st 30 seconds ( No later) which will get you into the CAT and then you can reset the password(s) HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=44705t=44702 -- FAQ, list

Louis Rossi's Token ring white paper [7:42885]

Hi All, I've lost my copy of Louis Rossi's Token ring white paper/How to read a RIF. Does anyone know where I can get this Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=42885t=42885 -- FAQ, list archives, and

VIC-2FXS pinout Issue [7:42816]

All, I am trying to get BOTH ports on a VIC-2FXS card working at the same time. I Understand that the wrong combinations of pinout can cause the 2nd port to be shutdown OK so I looked at cco and have tried the following pinouts for a cable between the phone and the VIC-2FXS ports. 1) Only pins 3

Source Route Transparent Bridging [7:42326]

Hi All I have a question to try and straighten out source route transparent bridging r1 and r2 are connected to a 3920 r2 and r3 and connected by a cat5 --- - --- --- |r1 |---|tr bridge|---|r2 |--e/net--|r3 | --- - --- --- trcrf2

RE: PPP MULTILINK LOAD THRIESHOLD [7:41783]

Anthony, I think (?) that ppp multilink load threshold is used when you bundle 2 or more serial interfaces in to a multilink channel. Not sure, but I'll have a look HTH Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41806t=41783

RE: stub areas and virtual-links [7:41744]

Sean, Doyle VOl1 page 465 says: 'The transit area cannot be a stub area' From that I would assume that a virtual link could not cross a stub area in any fashion. I will check when I ge a moment. Rich Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=41807t=41744

Re: Help with extended access lists [7:40904]

Thangavel What a great method - Thank you Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=40907t=40904 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and

RE: access-list problem [7:40092]

Shawn, (Unless I misunderstand what you need!!) The following line in your acl - !permit anyone to 172.16.1.0 port 80--web server access-list 101 permit tcp any 172.16.1.0 0.0.0.255 eq www Is saying 2 permit any source to get to 172.16.1.0 where the traffic is web traffic. As you would

RE: missing Interfaces on a 1003 [7:39133]

Danny, I had this same problem but with 2600 series routers. I loaded an IOS that supported the featurs I needed but DID NOT support the interfaces physically present on the box. It threw me a bit as well. Do a hardware/Software compatability check on CCO and then look for the images that

Catalyst Help Facility [7:39032]

Hi All, Does anyone know if it is possible to disable or turn off the help facility on a cat5. So, if you type ' set ? ' and hit return nothing happens. More to the point , if this has been disabled how can you enable this feature. Cheers Richard Message Posted at:

RE: clock rate [7:38908]

Ellis, Point 1 . Pass Point 2. Loopbacks in ospf are always advertised as stub networks, ie: /32 routes. You can change the network type on the loopback by using the command ' ip ospf network point-to-point ' the route will be seen by others as a route to a subnet. HTH Richard Message

Lab 1 , Richard 0..... [7:38537]

OK, My turn to bear my soul I took the lab in Brussels for the 1st time on 7th March and failed. I wondered of any other candidates may like to give their opinions on a few things. I found that I was completely freaked out by the fact that I was actually sitting there doing this fabled lab ,

RE: Well it's my turn...CCIE#8878 [7:37145]

Richard, Top Man - really well done - 1st go aswell. lets just hope I get the same result in Brussels on Thursday Well done again Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=37170t=37145 -- FAQ, list

Re: OSPF Network Type (In)Compatabilities [7:36781]

Tim, I have also been looking into this. As far as I know this is definate -you cannot have a the following: Hub - ip ospf network point-to-multipoint and spokes - ip ospf network broadcast ( Or the other way around ) due to a mismatch in the hello packets ala 3d00h: OSPF: Rcv hello from

Multilink and callback request/accept [7:36640]

All, Maybe i've missed something here but... I configured 2 routers over isdn with PPP Multilink and that r8 calls r6 and then r6 calls r8 back. All fine so far apart from I end up with one call IN and one call OUT as follows: r8#sh isd active

IPX/NLSP Gurus needed [7:35849]

All, I am trying to get NLSP summarization working with some difficulty. On CCO it states that redistribution is on by default between NLSP areas residing on the same router and therefore have to create summary access lists to maipulate the route redistribution between nlsp areas. I have the

RE: Round 1 to the lab [7:35410]

Scott, Really bad luck. But hey thanks for the encouragement - I have my lab in 3 weeks so that really makes me feel comfortable - not. I understand what you say about people reading a post similar to yours and thinking - this guy wasn't prepared. I am sure that is just pure arrogance on their

RE: Flash upgrade disaster [7:35184]

Christian, I have literally 2 minutes ago had to do this. When in rommon use the variables You can set the variables as follows as long as your laptop/pc can act as a tftp server. IN rommon type tftpdnld ? this provides you with a set of variables you can use to tftp the ios without

Please help - NLSP [7:35082]

( I did post this before so I'll try again ) Hi All, I am trying to get route sumarization working with NLSP. I have r1 that has networks as follows: Fa0/0 ipx net aaa1 Fa0/1 ipx net aaa2 I have enabled route-aggregation under NLSP but cannot figure out the acl to get only a

VOIP Vic-2fx cards [7:34768]

Hi All, I have 2 x Cisco 2621 routers and each have a 2port fxs voice card - vic-2fxs installed. When I plug my phone into port 1/0/0 of a vic-2fxs card installed in a 2621 I get dial tone. When I use port 1/0/1 I do not get dial tone. Is there any reason for this and what am I doing wrong.

RE: Where to place the loopback in an ospf environ [7:34445]

Rob, Very interesting. I have my lab in 4 weeks too in Brussels. Is there anywhere on CCO that details anything to do with this and why loopbacks should not be used in Area0. ?Is this OSPF Specific or LAB specific? I'll try and think about this today and see if I can figure out why. Richard

NLSP Summarization [7:34326]

Hi All, I am trying to get route sumarization working with NLSP. I have r1 that has networks as follows: Fa0/0 ipx net aaa1 Fa0/1 ipx net aaa2 I have enabled route-aggregation under NLSP but cannot figure out the acl to get only a summary of ' aaa ' advertised to r2 and not aaa1 and

RE: term no mon command [7:33658]

Hi Stuart, I think (?) that term no mon only applies to vty lines. Therefore you should use : conf t no logging console ^z Hope this helps Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33667t=33658 -- FAQ, list archives,

NAT ,Frame Subinterfaces [7:33424]

All, I have a hub and spoke setup, r1 is the hub and r2,r3,r4 are the spokes. r1 has a multipoint subif and r2,r3,r4 have p2p subif's. The ospf net running in the wan between r1,r2,r3,r4 is 10.128.10.0/24 WAN r1 ser0/0.1 multipoint = 10.128.10.1/24 r2 ser0/0.1 p2p = 10.128.10.2/24 r3 ser0/0.1

Re: NAT ,Frame Subinterfaces [7:33424]

Hi Joely, Thanks for that. However: 1 - I don't specify a source interface when pinging from the spoke to the hub and this works IP NAT detailed debugging is on r4#ping 10.128.10.10 Type escape sequence to abort. Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.128.10.10, timeout is 2 seconds: ! Success

Re: NAT ,Frame Subinterfaces [7:33424]

Joely, r1 (hub) interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat inside duplex auto speed auto ! ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.1 10.128.10.9 ! interface Serial0/0.1 multipoint ip address 10.128.10.1 255.255.255.0 ip nat outside ip

RE: BGP Backdoor! Lab on Friday, Please HELP! [7:33423]

Just my 2pence worth, Do you have to reset the BGP connection to get BGP to readivertise this route with an admin distance of 200 ( BGP Local ) Best of luck Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=33438t=33423 --

Sample DNS DHCP Configs [7:32801]

Hi All, Has anyone got any sample DNS/DHCP configs they could let me have for my lab. Many Thanks Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32801t=32801 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: CCIE Blues [7:32440]

Scott, Me too. I grasped the nettle about a month ago and wrote a list of all the things that terrified me - 30 items long. I then used MS Project and allocated as much time as I could trying to group the revision sensibly and making sure I did it!!! However, i't helped me channel my studying

Extended ipx access lists [7:31720]

Hi all, I have a lab with a hub and spoke network,r1 is the hub and r2,r3,r4 are the spokes. IPX eigrp is running on the frame cloud and IPX rip on the edge. I am trying to make sure that only network 100 at r1 is advertised to r2 and not to the remaining routers r3 and r4. Can someone help me

That Friday Follies Question... [7:29473]

it has an interface using a /27 ( tunnel ) You do not see r1 receiving the /27 route I would like to hear your thoughts as I cannot think of another way to get around this one. Best regards Richard Botham Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=29473t=29473

RE: secondary ip address on e0? [7:28027]

Hi Anil, There appears to be a conflict here. Is it Secondary addresses ( ie: 2 ip addresses on the same physical port) or subinterfaces. If you need secondary addressing use something like this conf t int fas0/0 ip address 10.128.10.1 255.255.255.0 ip address 172.16.16.1 255.255.255.0

RE: CCIE#8387 [7:26309]

Top man - Well done Let us know all about it (NDA Permitting) when you wake up Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26354t=26309 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

RE: Test Center more recommended for Candidate CCI [7:26128]

exam WITHOUT BREAKING THE NDA. Regards Richard Botham Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=26222t=26128 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct

Mike Williams frame DLSW [7:24930]

Mike, I GOT IT TO WORK DLSW using frame in direct encapsulation,no ip addresses or routes in sight!!! Thanks for all your suggestions. I didn't use the local dlci but did change the llc2 mappings to point to the dlci closest to the frame switch for each spoke router. So if rtr1 is spoke and

RE: dlsw using frame relay only [7:24475]

Mike, Thanks for that. I'll suppose this will only work as you say in a p2p setup. I will try the local dlci command as suggested. Appreciate you help here. Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24768t=24475

dlsw using frame relay only [7:24475]

Hi All, Has anyone managed to get dlsw working using frame relay encapsulation.(Direct Encapsulation) Are there any good examples anyone has that I could look at ? Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24475t=24475

RE: dlsw using frame relay only [7:24475]

Micheal, Thanks for the reply. I was looking at using the commands as follows for what Cisco call direct encapsulation , rather than specifying ip addresses as the remote peer destination GLobal config dlsw local-peer dlsw remote-peer 0 frame-relay interface s0/0 Interface commands

Re: Ipx routing [7:24091]

Hi All, Thanks for your responses. However, when i do wr t the config shows ipx routing and not ipx routing 2.2.2 Is this an IOS related issue Cheers Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=24254t=24091 -- FAQ,

Ipx routing [7:24091]

All, I'm trying to make sure that when I run IPX routing I can identify the router by using the ipx routing 2.2.2 where the router is router 2. I cannot get this to work correctly as it always picks the ethernet mac address instead of 2.2.2 Many thanks Richard Message Posted at:

RE: X2 command on a Term Serv?? [7:23475]

Brian, Thank you very much for that information Best Regards Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=23609t=23475 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report

RE: X2 command on a Term Serv?? [7:23475]

Hey CiscoNuts, I was thinking about the same problem and just read your note. I have done this and cannot get out of it without reloading the router. I tried to disconnect and clear lines but nothing helped. I wouldn't want this to happen in the exam so if you or anyone else comes across this let

RE: HSRP error with a BGP config!! [7:22179]

What type of router are you using. It looks like you may be using MHSRP fom the show standby CCO states that some older lower end routers using Lance /Quicc ethernet hardware will only support a single hsrp group and therefore only a single unicast mac address. Hope this helps. Richard Message

RE: translation/transparent bridging between tokenring [7:21651]

Erland, Try using: r2(config)#source-bridge transparent ? Source-route ring group attached to the transparent bridge To translate between Transparent and Source route bridging Get the PDF doc from cco for more help

SnapShot Routing and Dialer Interfaces [7:20771]

All, I have read that snapshot routing is not supported on dialer interfaces - only on legacy ddr (ie: BRI interfaces ). If this is correct why are the snapshot commands available under the dialer interface It gets even more confusing whan you download case studies from Cisco's web site that

RE: Errors in All-in-one CCIE [7:17985]

Khalid, In the nicest possible way - Preparing to be a CCIE does not include reading braindumps - If this is what you want the become an MCSE - thats easy - I know I was an MCSE (Until they invalidated it by changing the exams)years ago and then realised what a complete and utter waste of time

ospf summary address issue [7:16357]

Hi All, I have the following addresses 152.1.1.65/32 152.1.1.97/27 152.1.1.72/32 152.1.1.69/32 152.1.2.2/30 and have created 2 summary addresses of 152.1.1.0 /24 and 152.1.2.0/24 so that i can redistribute them into an igrp process that is addressed with a 24bit mask. The summary routes appear

RE: ospf summary address issue [7:16357]

All, Thanks for your help - I KNEW THIS - WHAT WAS I THINKING OF. Sorry to have wasted your time Richard Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=16389t=16357 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: