Re: Tax Credits

2001-02-21 Thread Stephen Alston
The only tax relief I know of is on your Schedule A. There of course, these expenses are only deductible after they exceed 2% of your adjusted gross income & then only the amount above the 2% threshold. If you own your own business, I would expect you could expense or depreciate the assets. HTH

Re: CIT/Support 2.0 Exam and Boson Tests

2000-10-06 Thread Stephen Alston
Title: CIT/Support 2.0 Exam and Boson Tests I haven't taken the exam yet, but have purchased both tests 1 & 2.  If I were only to purchase one, it'd definitely be test 2.  The questions are more challenging, and more importantly, the answers include references both from the Cisco Press CIT bo

Re: CIT/Support 2.0 Exam and Boson Tests

2000-10-06 Thread Stephen Alston
Title: CIT/Support 2.0 Exam and Boson Tests After rereading my post, I think I might have given the impression Test 1 isn't of value.  I am finding questions there that aren't in Test 2 -- in short, I think its a worthwhile test.  I still believe Test 2 is superior because of better questions

Re: Route Summarization [7:1794]

2001-04-24 Thread Stephen Alston
.0.0.0/15 might be > it. > > Chuck > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Stephen Alston > Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Route Summarization [7:1794] > > I want to

Re: Route Summarization [7:1794]

2001-04-25 Thread Stephen Alston
OK, I think I got it. /15 doesn't make sense if I want to pick up just a 10.2.0.0 network because it would also pick up a 10.3.0.0 network. /16 will work if its the intent to summarize at 10.2.0.0, however that over summarizes if its not our intent to pick up 10.2.0.0 Therefore the three address

Route Summarization [7:1794]

2001-04-24 Thread Stephen Alston
I want to summarize three addresses within an OSPF area: 10.2.1.0/24 10.2.2.0/24 10.2.3.0/24 Converting to binary, I see the 15th bit is the highest order bit the three addresses have in common. From that I see the summary address is 10.2.0.0. What I don't understand is why the subnet mask is 1

Re: CIT

2000-08-14 Thread Stephen Alston
The McGraw Hill CIT Course companion ISBN 0-07-212483-0 gets rave reviews on Amazon and B&N.    Steve "Perez, Robert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message B5564C423223D3118B18C79141CA012A78D2@PHLMAIL04">news:B5564C423223D3118B18C79141CA012A78D2@PHLMAIL04... I would like to know if

Re: how do I save my configuration once I make a change to an interface ?

2000-08-29 Thread Stephen Alston
Copy running-config startup-config or Copy run start Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > please advice on cisco 2500 series > > thansk > cheers > > > ___ > UPDATED Posting Guidelines: http://www.groupstudy.com/

Re: Question for DR/BDR in OSPF

2000-09-12 Thread Stephen Alston
Doug, I see you're using one of your "lifelines" I'd go with answer B & make it your final answer. Reason as stated in the ACRC book is "The only time a DR or BDR will change is if one of them goes down. If the DR goes down, the BDR takes over as the DR and a new BDR is elected. If the BD

Re: Question for DR/BDR in OSPF

2000-09-12 Thread Stephen Alston
eve the answer is C. The order of promotion is always from BDR to DR > when the DR fails. If router B fails then router C will be the DR, and > router A which has just come up on the network then becomes the BDR. > > Peter. > > > >From: "Stephen Alston" <[E

RTP Cisco User's Group Meeting - June 4 2003 [7:70061]

2003-06-03 Thread Stephen Alston
Folks, The Research Triangle Park (RTP) Cisco User's group will meet on June 4th from 12:00 to 1:00 PM in the first floor conference room of the Lake Building on Cisco's RTP campus. This meeting's topic will be TAC procedures and best practices. The meeting will also include a guided tour thr