Tony,
I, too, have seen many jobs that request a degree. I have no degree in this
field, but good certs and 5 years experience. This has always been more than
enough, even when a degree was requested.
Kris.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Alvarez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Everyone,
I am seeking a recommendation on a voip book, preferably something that
explains the different types of technologies and how they can be applied
'in the real world'. Right now, we are doing some very rudimentary voip
stuff with a variety of routers, 1760, 2600, and a 3600 seriers which i
I am curious as to whether anything else got upgraded besides the new
switch. I got the impression that this wasn't a problem before the upgrade,
in which case portfast could definitely be the culprit. However, you could
also see this error if DNS is improperly configured in a win2k domain. Also,
I
Do yo have portfast enabled on all end user ports?
Kris
-Original Message-
From: Tunde Kalejaiye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 7:17 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Catalyst 4000 and DHCP [7:62632]
hi all,
we just upgraded our network to a switched, a c
Raj,
There's a free utility available called Kiwi's cattools. It has an option
available to build a 'master arp table file' from the cisco devices you
setup in the program, which you can then view in excel. The file will
contain the MAC and the IP and you can search on either. If you haven't used
the best solution), or you
would have to use EIGRPs unequal cost load balancing.
All of this assumes you have Cisco routers on both sides of the link, if not
it is still possible to load share across the links, but how it would be
done is dependent on the vendor.
-Original Message-
Fr
P and unequal cost load balancing.
Here is a link that explains what it is:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk365/technologies_tech_note09186a0080
09437d.shtml
Waters, Kristina wrote:
>
> Everyone,
>
> I have a site that is currently connected with a 512k frame relay
> li
Everyone,
I have a site that is currently connected with a 512k frame relay link. We
are adding an additional T1 link to the same location. Is it possible to
aggregate these links in such a way that traffic will be carried across
both? If they are configured this way, will the other link still be
It does look like cisco might be phasing out the set based interface. The
newer sup engines come with the ios based int.
Kristina L. Waters
LAN/WAN Engineer
www.absfirst.com
"Many of life's failures are people who did not realize how close they were
to success when they gave up."
Thomas A. Edis
Everyone,
I'm in the process of changing my internal IP addresses and ran into a
problem on the first site I went to swap. Clients obtain their ip from a
dhcp server at my location, so I added a secondary ip address to the remote
router as shown below:
interface Ethernet0
ip address 172.16.x.x 2
Sam,
Do you have any sort of statement that's translating the addresses in your
DMZ? For example,
static (DMZ,outside) 141.152.135.23 141.152.135.23 netmask 255.255.255.255
If you aren't nat'ing I believe you still have to translate the address.
HTH,
Kris.
-Original Message-
From: Sam
Sam,
I used to copy my list out to notepad and add the new line. Do a 'no
access-list from-internet', then cut and paste the new one back in. Keep in
mind this will briefly leave you with no access list on that interface. Then
re-enter the 'access-group from-internet in interface outside' command,
Hi everyone,
My question is regarding ODR vs EIGRP. I have about 16 or 17 stub routers
that connect back to my core. Some of the remote locations are configured
via frame and are (or will) be running VOIP. Another group of remote (but
not quite as remote) locations are point-to-point, most with at
13 matches
Mail list logo
