Can someone tell me why a single autonomous system (AS) is better than
having multiple autonomous systems?
Sonia
_
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL
swer more
intelligently.
HTH,
John
>>> "Alassar, Sonia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3/22/01 11:47:20 AM >>>
Can someone tell me why a single autonomous system (AS) is better than
having multiple autonomous systems?
Sonia
_
FAQ, list archives, and
Yes, I am speaking about routing on the internet with BGP-4. If I am a
carrier that has 1 AS and I purchase another network (that has multiple
ASes) from another carrier, should I integrate them into a single AS, or
keep them as multiple AS? It is not that I want to have multiple AS,
however, I wi
Yikes. I think I'll defer to Howard, et. al. on that one. Here are my
thoughts on it, though.
For each separate routing policy you want to present to the internet,
you need a separate AS. This is to prevent inconsistent views of your
AS in the internet. Once you have connected your networks,
At 01:47 PM 3/22/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Can someone tell me why a single autonomous system (AS) is better than
>having multiple autonomous systems?
>
>Sonia
No simple answer -- but at the very least, AS numbers are an increasingly
scarce resource. At the present rate of allocat
At 02:44 PM 3/22/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Yes, I am speaking about routing on the internet with BGP-4. If I am a
>carrier that has 1 AS and I purchase another network (that has multiple
>ASes) from another carrier, should I integrate them into a single AS, or
>keep them as multiple AS? It is not th
As a matter of fact, I'm at the IETF meeting in Minneapolis. There's
been quite a bit of discussion of global routing system scaling issues,
and growth in the number of AS is one concern, although by no
means the chief one.
There has been very little growth in AS associated with transit ISPs,
bu
over time, a planned migration would likely be advantageous, from a
management perspective.
Bri
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Alassar, Sonia wrote:
> Yes, I am speaking about routing on the internet with BGP-4. If I am a
> carrier that has 1 AS and I purchase another network (that has multiple
>
domain (bellow the two gateways).
Does this make sense ??? Am I on target :-)
Phil
- Original Message -
From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alassar, Sonia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'John Neiberger'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EM
e sense ??? Am I on target :-)
>
> Phil
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Alassar, Sonia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "'John Neiberger'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t :-)
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "Alassar, Sonia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Cc: "'John Neiberger'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
>> <
al routing behaviour. It will be a lot
simpler to maintain symmetrical traffic.
""Alassar, Sonia"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].
..
> Can someone tell me why a single autonomous system (AS) is better than
Hi,
I am repeating my question, since I didn't hear from anybody, so I assume
that I didn't ask it the right way.
Here it is: If you want to connect AS 100 to AS 300 or multiple AS's what
are different ways that we can do it? We can use BGP. But I saw this
question asking that know "other w
>Hi,
>
>I am repeating my question, since I didn't hear from anybody, so I
>assume that I didn't ask it the right way.
>
>Here it is: If you want to connect AS 100 to AS 300 or multiple
>AS's what are different ways that we can do it? We can use BGP. But
>I saw this question asking that know
14 matches
Mail list logo
