Quick quesion for those who have taken the CCIE
Written
Can you go back after answering a question?
=
Paul M. Immo CCDP CCNP MCSE
Imagination is more important than knowledge
Albert Einstein
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the thi
Quick quesion for those who have taken the CCIE
Written
Can you go back after answering a question?
=
Paul M. Immo CCDP CCNP MCSE
Imagination is more important than knowledge
Albert Einstein
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the thi
Did the CCIE Written Question asking for the Cisco
Command Line Interface (CLI) as i found on the CCNP exam track ?
Regards,
SBS
CCNP,CCDP R&S
Did the CCIE Written Question asking for the Cisco
Command Line Interface (CLI) as i found on the CCNP exam track ?
Regards,
SBS
CCNP,CCDP R&S
Did the CCIE Written Question asking for the Cisco
Command Line Interface (CLI) as i found on the CCNP exam track ?
Regards,
SBS
CCNP,CCDP R&S
Yes
--- "Paul M. Immo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Quick
quesion for those who have taken the CCIE
> Written
>
> Can you go back after answering a question?
>
> =
> Paul M. Immo CCDP CCNP MCSE
> Imagination is more important than knowledge
> Albert Einstein
>
> __
Yes you can
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul M. Immo
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE Written Question
Quick quesion for those who have taken the CCIE
Written
Can you go back after
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: CCIE Written Question
Yes you can
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Paul M. Immo
Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 3:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE Written Question
Quick quesion for those who have
March 11, 2001 12:49 PM
> To: Paul M. Immo; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: CCIE Written Question
>
>
> Yes you can
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Paul M. Immo
> Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2001 3:17 PM
Ok I have another question about the CCIE written. I've heard the comment that if you
fail the test then when you retake it your required passing score is higher. Does
anyone know how much the passing score is increased by? I am considering taking the
written at the end of this week to asses
g
SantosoSent: Monday, November 13, 2000 7:54 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: CCIE Written Question
?
Did the CCIE Written Question asking for the
Cisco Command Line Interface (CLI) as i found on the CCNP exam track
?
Regards,
SBS
CCNP,CCDP
R&S
No one appears in CCIE R/S, Design, Security (Beta) Qualification.
On 14 Nov 2000 01:32:38 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("SBS") wrote:
>Did the CCIE Written Question asking for the Cisco Command Line Interface (CLI) as i
>found on the CCNP exam track ?
>
>Regards,
>
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Additional CCIE Written Question
Ok I have another question about the CCIE written. I've heard the comment
that if you fail the test then when you retake it your required passing
score is higher. Does anyone know how much the passing score is increased
still at 70%
-Original Message-
From: Curtis Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 7:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Additional CCIE Written Question
Ok I have another question about the CCIE written. I've heard the comment
that if you fail the
sing. Right now the passing score is
>still at 70%
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Curtis Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 7:46 AM
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Additional CCIE Written Question
>
>
>Ok I have another questio
I like the logic, maybe I will go and lower it some more in january ..;-)
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Curtis Call [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 5:07 PM
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: Additional CCIE Written Question
Well in that case I
I want to start studying for the CCIE written exam, just wondering what
books should I buy / read for this?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Hunt Lee
IP Solution Analyst
Cable & Wireless
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28259&t=28259
---
I was just wondering if anybody knows a way to translate Ethernet MAC
(Cananical) to Token MAC (non-Cananical) & vice versa??
I know how to do the simple ones:
e.g. 1078.xsxx.
HexDec SwapDecHex
10 = 16=> 0001 =>000
Does the longest match rule always override administrative distance??
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16797&t=16797
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report mi
Can you have collisions on a serial link? Thanks again.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17050&t=17050
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and
PROTECTED]
Subject: CCIE Written Question [7:28259]
I want to start studying for the CCIE written exam, just wondering what
books should I buy / read for this?
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Hunt Lee
IP Solution Analyst
Cable & Wireless
Message Posted at:
I would also suggest Bridges,Routers and Switches by Andrew Bruce Caslow.
It's designed for the lab but it's also good for the written. Good luck!
-junovtv
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=28301&t=28259
--
FAQ, li
veral examples in the questions at the end of
this chapter.
I hope that helps...
--- Dennis
- Original Message -
From: "Hunt Lee"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 5:11 PM
Subject: CCIE Written Question [7:44578]
> I was just wondering if anybody knows a way to translate Ethe
Hello,
I just want to add my own to what Dennis has said (actually I have
learned it from his book too - Thanks Dennis)
How can you easily memorize this you may be wondering...
0=0 ( - ) 8=1 (1000 - 0001)
1=8 (0001 - 1000) 9=9 (1001 - 1001)
2=4 (0010 - 0100) A=5 (1010 - 0101)
Hunt,
I hope you get something good from my post. having said that.. I'm
letting loose flames or not..
Okay. maybe this time I've had a too few many beers. but COME ON
PEOPLE!!! What's the problem with bitswapping?!?!?!?
There are 16 possible conversions from binary t
Excellent!!! I hope you don't mind if I steal that for the next book... :-)
--- Dennis
- Original Message -
From: "Peter I. Racz"
To:
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: CCIE Written Question [7:44578]
> Hello,
>
> I just want to add my own
Very good. just on time. I am going to take my CCIE written this Friday.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44663&t=44578
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report
Pls. see below :
0200.1078.0400
Write in binary :
0200 10780400
0010 0001 0111 1000 0100
After that exchange as under
0010 0001 1000 0111 0100
And then
0100
Written Question [7:16797]
Does the longest match rule always override administrative distance??
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16800&t=16797
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groups
Yes, it does.
rgds,
-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 6:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
Does the longest match rule always override administrative distance??
Message Posted
-
From: McCallum, Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
In a nut shell yes an
ge-
From: McCallum, Robert
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: Quick CCIE Written Question
[7:16797]
In a n
route
staticaly defined (which has a lower administrative distance). With both
routes int the routing table, then the longest match will count...
Ednilson Rosa
- Original Message -
From: "McCallum, Robert"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Writ
ay, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM
> To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
>
> In a nut shell yes and no. i.e.
>
> Admin distance is the winner by means tha
In this case, if you want to communicate with the host 10.1.1.1, for
instance, the route chosen will be the static...
Regards,
Ednilson Rosa
- Original Message -
From: "Wright, Jeremy"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:17 AM
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Questio
quot;
To: "McCallum, Robert" ;
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:33 AM
Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
I don't think this is correct: If you have a route learned by EIGRP and a
more specific (longer match) route learned by OSPF, both will go to the
routing
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 8:32 AM
> To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:RE: Quick CCIE Written Question
> [7:16797]
>
> In a nut shell yes and no. i.e.
>
> Admi
you're wrong.
the /28 will be chosen.
-humboldt
-Original Message-
From: Ednilson Rosa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
In this case, if you want to communicate with the
-Original Message-
From: Wright, Jeremy
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 10:20 AM
To: 'Peter Slow'
Subject:RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
I may be wrong on this but this is what I am guessing: It will choose the
route with the lowest AD and put i
I bet 1$ on the static /26
Teresa
- Original Message -
From: Peter Slow
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 5:16 PM
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
you're wrong.
the /28 will be chosen.
-humboldt
-Original Message-
oops. diddn't click reply all...
-Original Message-
From: Peter Slow
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:43 AM
To: 'Wright, Jeremy'; Peter Slow
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
when we speak about a network, we speak about a pair, a net id and a netmas
The most specific route- mask wise. Easy peasy lemon squeezy. Ask me another
Bamber.
> -Original Message-
> From: Teresa Presutto [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 August 2001 16:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:1679
st specific route- mask wise. Easy peasy lemon squeezy. Ask me
another
Bamber.
> -Original Message-
> From: Teresa Presutto [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 22 August 2001 16:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
You are right and I was wrong. OSPF /28 would be correct in this case.
My apologies,
Ednilson Rosa
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 1:37 PM
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
Assume the following prefixes av
addressing.
check this link from cisco out
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html
- Original Message -
From: "John Neiberger"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 12:37 PM
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
>Assume the following prefixes
I agree with Brian, these are different route entries, and should all be
installed. The route ultimately taken is dependent on the destination.
CM
- Original Message -
From: "Brian"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 3:42 PM
Subject: RE: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:167
IL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
>
> I agree with Brian, these are different route entries, and should all be
> installed. The route ultimately taken is dependent on the destination.
>
> CM
> - Original Message -
> From: "Br
d. Playing with fire if you ask me.
Wayne
-Original Message-
From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 6:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16891]
Yes, the presence of 'no ip classless' (or ip clueless
gt; > Sent: Thursday, 23 August 2001 8:49 am
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject:Re: Quick CCIE Written Question [7:16797]
> >
> > I agree with Brian, these are different route
> entries, and should all be
> > installed. The route ultimately taken is de
Just a note:
Summary: Installation: Lowest Administrative distance (all other routes
are discarded until new 'election' during the updates when the route is
failed)
Forwarding: Longest Match + Destination IP WITHIN the RANGE
After reading the article below, I want to point out that
Most are full duplex, so in those cases, no you shouldn't..
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Wright, Jeremy wrote:
> Can you have collisions on a serial link? Thanks again.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=17052
A serial link, is not a shared media.
Serial link is used for point to point connection => no collision
U can have collision if Tx is connected on Tx on the other side of the
cable, but if the cable and interfaces (X21, V24 ...) are good, there's no
collision.
--
Stephane LITKOWSKI
Student in a
>Most are full duplex, so in those cases, no you shouldn't..
>
>Brian "Sonic" Whalen
>Success = Preparation + Opportunity
>
>
>On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Wright, Jeremy wrote:
>
> > Can you have collisions on a serial link? Thanks again.
>
I'm in general agreement, but be aware that you might run i
I think this is actually more of a CCNP troubleshooting question. Think
about the type of media you're dealing with. Collisions happen on media
that allow multiple devices to speak at the same time. If the media or
topology does not allow multiple access then you cannot have
collisions.
On mos
ECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: Another CCIE Written Question [7:17050]
I think this is actually more of a CCNP troubleshooting
question.
Tis why I said most and shouldn't :) I expected the longtime lurkers to
come back with a couple that weren't full duplex.
Brian "Sonic" Whalen
Success = Preparation + Opportunity
On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >Most are full duplex, so in those cases, no you shouldn't..
> >
I agree with you.
Serial link is not always full duplex. It depends of the relation between
the two entities : primary/secondary (Normal mode : SDLC -> SNRM frame) or
Balance mode (LAPB -> SABM frame).
--
Stephane LITKOWSKI
Student in a french computer science school
EPITA Telecom & Network spe
From: John Neiberger
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2001 4:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Another CCIE Written Question
[7:17050]
I
>I think this is actually more of a CCNP troubleshooting question. Think
>about the type of media you're dealing with. Collisions happen on media
>that allow multiple devices to speak at the same time. If the media or
>topology does not allow multiple access then you cannot have
>collisions.
>
When I first started at the bank as a teller, we were running 9600 bps
multidrop lines. but, luckily for me, I was blissfully unaware of
anything related to networking at the time, so I didn't notice. ;-)
By the time I started in the department we had upgraded to 56k frame
relay with Motorola F
At 05:23 PM 8/23/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> >Most are full duplex, so in those cases, no you shouldn't..
> >
> >Brian "Sonic" Whalen
> >Success = Preparation + Opportunity
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Wright, Jeremy wrote:
> >
> > > Can you have collisions on a serial link? Thanks agai
In a message dated 8/23/01 3:29:24 PM Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Subj: Another CCIE Written Question [7:17050]
Date: 8/23/01 3:29:24 PM Central Daylight Time
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wright, Jeremy)
Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PRO
>At 05:23 PM 8/23/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>> >Most are full duplex, so in those cases, no you shouldn't..
>> >
>> >Brian "Sonic" Whalen
>> >Success = Preparation + Opportunity
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Wright, Jeremy wrote:
>> >
>> > > Can you have collisions on a serial
Thanks for sharing questions from the CCIE written... let us know if you
have any more...
""Wright, Jeremy"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Can you have collisions on a serial link? Thanks again.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f
Howard,
Does is it really matter if it is BSC or SDLC multidrop network. In an IBM
SDLC network you are dealing with Master/SLave design so you will never get
collisions becuase the Master controlls the transmission time
Most are full duplex, so in those cases, no you shouldn't..
>
>Brian "So
This isn't an actual answer to your question about BSC and SDLC, which
Howard can do, but for all of you wondering about this issue, I recommend
chapter 3 of Tannenbaum, "Computer Networks."
He goes into lots of interesting details about how to allocate a single
broadcast channel among competi
Does the R&S written exam include any questions on EIGRP being used for IPX
or Appletalk?
Many thanks
Tim
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66619&t=66619
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.gro
Good reading on this:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/21.html
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=16831&t=16797
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report miscond
Yes!
it does have a lot of redistribution questions on EIGRP and IPX with
complicated scenarios. I didn't have any on AppleTalk.
""Tim Champion"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Does the R&S written exam include any questions on EIGRP being used for
IPX
> or Appletalk?
>
> Many thanks
>At 05:23 PM 8/23/01, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
>> >Most are full duplex, so in those cases, no you shouldn't..
>> >
>> >Brian "Sonic" Whalen
>> >Success = Preparation + Opportunity
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, 23 Aug 2001, Wright, Jeremy wrote:
>> >
>> > > Can you have collisions on a serial
70 matches
Mail list logo
