Hi all,
I have read in one of the books and internet also that dlci value range is
dependent on lmi type configured.
Example
The following DLCI ranges are based on LMI protocol:
ANSI: 16 - 991
CISCO: 16 - 1007
Q933a: 16 - 991
But when we configure LMI type as example take ansi so after t
Sounds about right. In the Lucent 9000 frame realy switch doc, this
is a carrier class switch, it list the range of 16-001 as available for
all LMI types and 16-1007 for LMI Rev1 which is the same a Cisco LMI.
1-15 and 1008-1023 are reserved.
Dave
Simmi Singla wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have rea
Hi Dave,
Thanx for the reply,but I am still not clear
> Sounds about right. In the Lucent 9000 frame realy switch doc,
> this
> is a carrier class switch, it list the range of 16-001 as
> available for
> all LMI types and 16-1007 for LMI Rev1 which is the same a
> Cisco LMI.
> 1-15 and 1008-1023
I think he had a typo and meant to say 16-991 for everything except LMI Rev
1 (Cisco). With LMI Rev 1 (which is the same as "cisco"), the DLCI range is
16 - 1007. He was agreeing with your list.
As far as why does a Cisco router still say that DLCIs 16 - 1007 are
available even after you configre
I meant the first range to read 16-1007, need to proof read before
sending:(
Dave
Simmi Singla wrote:
> Hi Dave,
> Thanx for the reply,but I am still not clear
>
>>Sounds about right. In the Lucent 9000 frame realy switch doc,
>>this
>>is a carrier class switch, it list the range of 16-00
Thanx Priscilla /Dave
for clearing my doubts about these lmi dependency with dlci
Thanx once again
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> I think he had a typo and meant to say 16-991 for everything
> except LMI Rev 1 (Cisco). With LMI Rev 1 (which is the same as
> "cisco"), the DLCI range is 16 - 1007
6 matches
Mail list logo
