Dear Group,
I have been trying to duplicate the problem where if you enter a frame relay
map stament in a frame realy interface that is also using frame relay
inverse arp that inverse arp will be disabled for specific protocol for that
specific DLCI specified in the frame relay map statement.
I
t all
so you have to put "no keep" under the interface.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Ezerski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 1:26 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Ar
is is a basic function of FR.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Ok, now you all got me interested.
#1) From what
2001 10:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Ok, now you all got me interested.
#1) From what I'm reading, you are saying that if you create a FR lab and
just place the DLCI map commands on the frame switch for the remote ends,
and
you h
t: Monday, January 15, 2001 9:59 AM
> To: 'Nigel Taylor'; Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group
> Study
> Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
>
>
> I have an interesting tidbit that I hope can add to this thread. I was
> doing a frame relay lab and set u
EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Joseph Ezerski
Sent: Monday, January 15, 2001 9:59 AM
To: 'Nigel Taylor'; Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group
Study
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
I have an interesting tidbit that I hope can add to this thread. I was
doing a frame re
Yes, you are correct on both counts.
1. Both Caslow's book and Cisco's documentation state the same - if a map
is used, inverse arp is disabled for that dlci for that protocol on that
interface.
2. If you set up a lab to prove this, you can't. I did the same, and got
the same results as you.
, January 14, 2001 6:48 PM
To: Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group Study
Subject: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Hi All,
I was working through a number of frame relay lab and made =
some pretty cool observations. The big one being that I had Inverse-Arp =
working as well wh
inal Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Nigel Taylor
>Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 7:10 PM
>To: CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study; Stephen Masraum
>Cc: Bryant Andrews
>Subject: Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
>
>
>Steph
ising you, maybe?).
Frame inverse arp works for everything but point-to-point subinterfaces.
For these interface types, it is not needed.
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 6:48 PM
To: Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Wayne S. Lewis
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 11:34 PM
To: Nigel Taylor; CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study; Stephen
Masraum
Cc: Bryant Andrews
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
For the frame
Study
Subject: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Hi All,
I was working through a number of frame relay lab and made =
some pretty cool observations. The big one being that I had Inverse-Arp =
working as well while using the "frame-map" command. Everything I know =
tells me this
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
For the frame relay configurations, I never followed the directions that
people gave on using frame-relay maps. I was always able to get the labs to
work fine with inverse-arp doing its thing under the usual scenarios (NBMA,
point-to-point, multipoint
day, January 14, 2001 11:34 PM
To: Nigel Taylor; CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study; Stephen
Masraum
Cc: Bryant Andrews
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
For the frame relay configurations, I never followed the directions that
people gave on using frame-relay maps. I was alw
Cc: Bryant Andrews
Subject: Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Stephen,
Yep, that's exactly that happened. Here's the important
config stuff...
Here's the layout..
I've got the typical hub and spoke topology frame cloud. I've got all 4
devices
usin
January 14, 2001 7:10 PM
To: CCIE_Lab Group Study; Cisco Group Study; Stephen Masraum
Cc: Bryant Andrews
Subject: Re: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Stephen,
Yep, that's exactly that happened. Here's the important
config stuff...
Here's the layout..
I've got the
Stephen,
Yep, that's exactly that happened. Here's the important
config stuff...
Here's the layout..
I've got the typical hub and spoke topology frame cloud. I've got all 4
devices
using physical and using Inverse-Arp to dynamically activate the PVC's.
here's the
pertinent confi
ad?
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Nigel Taylor
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 8:48 PM
To: Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group Study
Subject: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Hi All,
I was working through a numb
27;; Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group
Study
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Why wouldn't it? Inverse ARP is a dynamic mapping, 'frame map' command is a
static mapping.
If I remember correctly, You must disable inverse arp on the major interface
even if you h
riginal Message -
From: "Nigel Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cisco Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Chuck Larrieu"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "CCIE_Lab Group Study" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 9:47 PM
Subject: F
once you entered one frame map; now, I have heard that it ain't. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 7:20 PM
To: Ronnie Royston; Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group
Study
Subject: Re: Frame Relay.
Group
Study <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2001 9:55 PM
Subject: RE: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
> Why wouldn't it? Inverse ARP is a dynamic mapping, 'frame map' command is
a
> static mapping.
>
> If I remember correctly, You must disable inverse
It will work for all other protocols other than what you defined in your map
statement.
-Original Message-
From: Nigel Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 15 January 2001 13:48
To: Cisco Group Study; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group Study
Subject: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp
; Chuck Larrieu; CCIE_Lab Group Study
Subject: Frame Relay...Inverse-Arp..?
Hi All,
I was working through a number of frame relay lab and made =
some pretty cool observations. The big one being that I had Inverse-Arp =
working as well while using the "frame-map" command.
Hi All,
I was working through a number of frame relay lab and made =
some pretty cool observations. The big one being that I had Inverse-Arp =
working as well while using the "frame-map" command. Everything I know =
tells me this shouldn't be but it works.
I reloaded the routers and
25 matches
Mail list logo
