> I came across this about three years ago while setting up a
> multicast network and experiencing throughput problems, IOS was
> 112-13_P(1). It looks like Cisco have changed the allocation
> method, what IOS are you running?
IOS (tm) C5RSM Software (C5RSM-DS-M), Version 11.3(3a)WA4(5)
Perhaps
khramov wrote:
>
> Do both RSMs need to be on the same subnet?
Yes. For instance, let's say VLAN 1 was the 10.1.1.0/24 subnet.
You could configure RSM#1 to have an address in VLAN1 of 10.1.1.2/24.
Then configure RSM#2 to have an address in VLAN1 of 10.1.1.3/24.
Then configure HSRP on both RSM
Only if you want redundancy
Dave
khramov wrote:
>
> Do both RSMs need to be on the same subnet?
>
> Thanks
>
> richard beddow wrote:
>
> > Mike,
> >
> > DMA channels are indeed the I/O's ports I refered to, but I couldn't
> > remember what they were called (each time I learn something new
If you want to load share the VLANs and provide resilience using HSRP both
RSMs need to have an interface configured in every VLAN.
Also I would not use VLAN 1 for data as this VLAN cannot be removed from a
trunk and so propergates everywhere.
RB.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/f
Do both RSMs need to be on the same subnet?
Thanks
richard beddow wrote:
> Mike,
>
> DMA channels are indeed the I/O's ports I refered to, but I couldn't
> remember what they were called (each time I learn something new , something
> old falls out the other end).
>
> I came across this about th
Mike,
DMA channels are indeed the I/O's ports I refered to, but I couldn't
remember what they were called (each time I learn something new , something
old falls out the other end).
I came across this about three years ago while setting up a multicast
network and experiencing throughput problems,
Richard,
Good information. Here is part of the output of this command when I give
this command on one of our 5500 RSMs. FYI: We have 2 5500s with RSMs,
however, with the exception of one VLAN, RSM#1 is the HSRP primary for all
other VLANs. Heres the output:
VlanTypeDMA Channel M
The load balacing of the VLANs is recommended best practice, however the RSM
does not have wire speed access to the backplane, it has two I/O "ports"
each one 200Mbps FDX(from memory). By default all odd VLANs are assigned to
the first port and all even VLANs to the second. So if you have all eve
I agree with Dave here. Make both RSMs part of every VLAN, then make RSM1
the HSRP primary for even VLANs, and RSM2 the HSRP primary for odd VLANs.
Mike W.
MADMAN wrote:
>
> You make each RSM part of EVERY VLAN! Yes for redundancy and
> loadsharing even VLANS active for RSM1, odd for RSM2 is
address X.X.6.252 255.255.255.0
standby 6 timers 2 6
standby 6 priority 100 preempt
standby 6 ip X.X.6.253
Regards,
Debra Chan
-Original Message-
From: khramov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP design [7:28982
You make each RSM part of EVERY VLAN! Yes for redundancy and
loadsharing even VLANS active for RSM1, odd for RSM2 is very reasonable
and I think a recommneded way if you dig around CCO. I have done
several of these with RSM's and MSFC in the 6500 series, works great.
Dave
Don't copy config
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HSRP design [7:28982]
Hello
I have a design question. I have two 5505 with RSM in each that are
connected to each other with 200Mb trunk. Right now RSM of the first
switch is in VLAN 1; RSM of
Hello
I have a design question. I have two 5505 with RSM in each that are
connected to each other with 200Mb trunk. Right now RSM of the first
switch is in VLAN 1; RSM of the second switch is in the VLAN 2.
Altogether I have about 20 VLANs. I am planning to run HSRP between
both RSMs. What w
13 matches
Mail list logo
