If you're using PIM Dense-Sparse mode you will need to designate an RP
router because the DR needs to know where to send the (*,G) to join and the
source DR needs to register the SA messages to the RP.
What you can do for this case is
R1-SP1---SP2-R2
make either R1 or R2 the RP.
, 2003 11:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multicasting [7:72403]
If you're using PIM Dense-Sparse mode you will need to designate an RP
router because the DR needs to know where to send the (*,G) to join and the
source DR needs to register the SA messages to the RP.
What you can do
We are using dense mode. Havent tested the rest. No auto-rp MSDP. Tunnel
worked on pt-2-pt , but not when its not that way.
Rgds
- Original Message -
From: Reimer, Fred
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:10 PM
Subject: RE: Multicasting [7:72403]
I've
Thanks for your config. But would be ideal if you can send me a config when
there is no pt-2-pt link.
Rgds
- Original Message -
From: alaerte Vidali
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 1:25 AM
Subject: RE: Multicasting [7:72403]
I have configured it same
Subject: RE: Multicasting [7:72403]
I think you said that you see traffic going out one tunnel, but not coming
in on the other end of the tunnel. How are you checking that? What does
your mroute cache look like for the group in question? Does it list the
tunnel interface as an outgoing
revert back to me for more info.
Rgds
- Original Message -
From: Reimer, Fred
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 3:59 AM
Subject: RE: Multicasting [7:72403]
I think you said that you see traffic going out one tunnel, but not
coming
in on the other end
Hi,
This is on multicasting. We are trying to setup a muticasted n/w on GRE
tunnel
with mutilple transit routers. We have enabled muticast only in the end
routers i.e tunnel source/destination routers. IGMP too has been enabled with
a group being formed.
Though we were able to successfully carry
.
-Original Message-
From: MR [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multicasting [7:72403]
Hi,
This is on multicasting. We are trying to setup a muticasted n/w on GRE
tunnel
with mutilple transit routers. We have enabled muticast only
I have configured it same time ago; the serial link was frame relay. But I
used point-to-point subinterface
Something like that:
R1
interface tunnel 0
ip address 172.16.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip pim sparse-dense-mode
tunnel source 192.168.1.1
tunnel destination 192.168.1.2
!
inter ser 0
encap
are not authorized to use, disclose, distribute, copy, print
or rely on this email, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: alaerte Vidali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multicasting [7:72403]
I
Hi All,
We need to enable multicasting support accross our network. Their are two
technologies available to limit the multicast
packets on the switch: 1) RGMP 2)CGMP. My routers support both these
technologies. Just wanted to know from the
group if any body has used any of these which is better
Do CGMP.
wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All,
We need to enable multicasting support accross our network. Their are two
technologies available to limit the multicast
packets on the switch: 1) RGMP 2)CGMP. My routers support both these
technologies. Just wanted to know from
Hmm.. For software, you can get a demo copy of Cisco's IP/TV. It's a working
demo of both server and client. Best of all, it's free.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=66424t=66326
--
FAQ, list archives, and
Greetings all,
I'm trying to set up a test bed to test multicasting in a wan environment.
I'm looking for any feedback, test plans and any software that might come in
handy.
Thanks, Gibran
-
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live
Look up ip multicast helper-map...
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=64183t=64130
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations
on R2's
LAN to access some multicast source on R1's LAN. The condition is, R2 is
not multicast-ready or is not capable of multicasting. In effect, you
can't enable ip multicast-routing on R2.
Can this work? What other configs should I add?
Thanks,
OrlyP
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com
Hi
I want to work on IP Multicast in my home lab...
Any idea on examples..to workout.
Thanks and Regards
Rob
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
Message Posted at:
: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multicasting Examples [7:48395]
Hi
I want to work on IP Multicast in my home lab...
Any idea on examples..to workout.
Thanks and Regards
Rob
_
Chat with friends online, try
The PERL multicasting module works great. I use that to test multicasting
in my router lab. I think it only works in linux. Search for it at:
http://search.cpan.org -- you'll need to know a little bit about PERL
though. But the examples given will give you the code you need.
Jason
Hi,
Anyone know whether to get test Multicasting software
for windows version. I believe iperf can do it in Unix
but not in windows.
Thanks
Rgds,
Sam
-Original Message-
From: Mike Bernico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 11:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
Tom,
You do not have to configure RPF. It is an automatic mechanism. It is part
of PIM protocol. It is used to prevent loops. The interface that is
considered the shortest path to the source does an RPF check. Kind of like
Split Horizon.
When a router receives a multicast packet, it checks
Hi guys,
when reading the documentation CD, I found something RPF (Reverse path
forwarding) .
CAn any one explain whats that and how we can configure??
Thanks.
TOM
_
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
Hi Tom,
here is the explanation from the Cisco site:
In multicast routing, the source is sending traffic to an arbitrary group of
hosts that are represented by a multicast group address. The multicast
router must determine which direction is upstream (towards the source) and
which direction (or
Hi George,
Thanks a lot for ur reply.
Is any one here can help me how to configure it??
Thanks
TOM
From: Georg Pauwen
Reply-To: Georg Pauwen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multicasting problem [7:36941]
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 12:11:19 -0500
Hi Tom,
here is the explanation from
Hiu guys..
Iam continuously getting this error on my routers configured for
multicasting..Any idea???
Thanks for the help.
22:01:21: %PIM-4-DEPRECATED_HELLO_TLV: Deprecated PIM Hello Option TLV 19
(Bidir
TLV) from 172.16.1.1 (Serial0)
22:02:21: %PIM-4-DEPRECATED_HELLO_TLV: Deprecated PIM
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Daniel Cotts
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 10:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multicasting - means what? [7:18232]
I haven't yet been successful with finding 01-00-0c-ee-ee-ee but I'll tell
where I've been
this post results from an off line conversation with someone regarding
multicasting. The original question follows:
someone said:
CGMP: Router sends CGMP multicast packets to the switches at a well known
multicast MAC address: 01-00-0C-DD-DD-DD.
Now by definition, if all multicast frames have
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chuck Larrieu
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 9:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Multicasting - means what? [7:18232]
this post results from an off line conversation with someone regarding
multicasting. The original question follows:
someone said:
CGMP: Router sends
-
From: Leigh Anne Chisholm [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 1:04 PM
To: Chuck Larrieu; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multicasting - means what? [7:18232]
Heck no Chuck... I don't mind you bringing it up. I think it's an
interesting discussion. If you hadn't
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 6:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Multicasting - means what? [7:18232]
you know, Leigh Anne, I recall seeing a CAM table in one of the
documents I
checked while I was researching you question. check out
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/22.html
a different multicast destination address
(x'800778020200) Which translates to 01-e0-1e-40-40-00 ??
Another list of multicasting addresses is located at:
http://www.cavebear.com/CaveBear/Ethernet/multicast.html
He does not have the Cisco PVST+ address of 01-00-0c-cc-cc-cd
If anyone does find
is this statement:
Note that for the purposes of EIGRP, Frame Relay and Switched Multimegabit
Data Service (SMDS) networks may or may not be considered to be NBMA. These
networks are considered NBMA if the interface has not been configured to use
physical multicasting; otherwise
backbones?
and How to map IP Multicasting protocols over ATM?
thanks,
komy
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=9679t=9679
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct
speaks at what time in an audio
conference.
and How to map IP Multicasting protocols over ATM?
See the following RFCs:
2022 Support for Multicast over UNI 3.0/3.1 based ATM Networks. G.
Armitage. November 1996. (Format: TXT=189219 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED
STANDARD)
2121 Issues
What is the purpose of LMI Multicasting? I've seen the Allows a sender to
transmit a single frame but
have it delivered by the network to multiple recipients. But that doesn't
quite cut it. How would you use LMI multicasting and what is the difference
between the frame interface-dlci
Try
http://www.hugewave.com/blackbook/lbb/download.htm
""Pierre-Alex"" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I would like to experiment switching multicast traffic. My plan right now
is
using PowerPoint or Windows Media Encoder
to generate the
I would like to experiment switching multicast traffic. My plan right now is
using PowerPoint or Windows Media Encoder
to generate the traffic. Is there an easier / more controlled way to create
multicast streams?
Pierre-Alex
_
FAQ, list archives, and
to how far the packets are allowed to
propagate without having to rewrite the IP module. The IP rule of
decrementing by 1 (sec or hop) remains intact.
I will do some IP multicasting tests soon to see if the above makes sense.
The IOS has not failed to surprise me yet.
Winston.
-Original Message
I am boning up on IP multicasting and I have a question about TTL =
Thresholds. When a multicast packet passes through an interface with a =
configured TTL threshold, is the TTL decremented my 1 or by the =
threshold value?
-- Kevin=20
_
FAQ, list archives
as the
firewall/VPN for each office (each office has a connection to the Internet
and we have VPN tunnels that link our network together). My question is
this: Will I have to enable a routing protocol on the routers to enable
multicasting?
Thanks,
Jeff
___
UPDATED Posting
40 matches
Mail list logo