Re: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-15 Thread Jason J. Roysdon
ure in the new IOSes. > > Ken Claussen MCSE CCNA CCA > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > "The Mind is a Terrible thing to Waste!" > > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Hire, Ejay > Sent: Thursday, April 12,

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-15 Thread Ken Claussen
: Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321] Is there any way to do NAT on a PIX or a Cisco router if you only have one usable IP address? I perused CCO, and the most minimalistic NAT/PAT config I can find still requires 2 (1 inte

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]

2001-04-15 Thread Chris Larson
lf Of Charles Manafa Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:37 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] VPN does not work when IPSEC packets are NAT'd. One of the reasons why this doesn't work is that packet authentication will fail when the packet is NAT'd -

Re: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Allen May
Check in your manual in the section on the 'global' command and read about NAT vs PAT. I think you'll find your answer there. - Original Message - From: "Hire, Ejay" To: Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321

Re: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Allen May
Or NAT overload...brain fart..heh. - Original Message - From: "Hire, Ejay" To: Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:12 PM Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321] > Is there any way to do NAT on a PIX or a Cisco router if you only have one > usable IP address

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Elijah Savage
] Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321] Is there any way to do NAT on a PIX or a Cisco router if you only have one usable IP address? I perused CCO, and the most minimalistic NAT/PAT config I can find still requires 2 (1 interface, one global) addresses. The Linksys/Netgear jobbies do it

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Hire, Ejay
(216.142.0.1 255.255.255.252) - (216.142.0.2 255.255.255.252) Router - Internal network. -Original Message- From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:47 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321] Yeah his comment makes

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Carroll Kong
At 11:45 AM 4/12/01 -0400, Charles Manafa wrote: >I believe the issue here is a VPN client initiating an IPSEC tunnel behind a >NAT device. This configuration does not work. > >A Cisco router or PIX can do a NAT then establish IPSEC tunnel with a remote >end point. Once the tunnel is created, the

Re: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Allen May
o make sure all outbound ports are opened up correctly on the router. Not the prettiest solution but it just might work ;) Allen - Original Message - From: "Curtis Call" To: Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:46 AM Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321] > If the DS

Re: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Allen May
ginal Message - From: "Circusnuts" To: Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:07 AM Subject: Re: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] > Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ??? > > - Original Message - > From: Charles Manafa > To: > Sent: Thursday, Apr

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Curtis Call
assing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] > >Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ??? > >- Original Message - >From: Charles Manafa >To: >Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:37 AM >Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] > > > > VPN does not

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Charles Manafa
use the tunnel to connect to the private network. This configuration works. Charles -Original Message- From: Circusnuts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/04/01 14:07 Subject: Re: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ??? - Original Message

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Hire, Ejay
ge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 7:11 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] All, I purchased a 1605 from eBay for my home lab. I decided to play with it a bit on my DSL circuit. I am using NAT on this router, and everything works f

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Elijah Savage
] Subject: Re: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ??? - Original Message - From: Charles Manafa To: Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:37 AM Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] > VPN does not work when IPSEC packets are NA

Re: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Circusnuts
Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ??? - Original Message - From: Charles Manafa To: Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:37 AM Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] > VPN does not work when IPSEC packets are NAT'd. One of the reasons why this > does

RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Charles Manafa
EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12/04/01 12:11 Subject: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321] All, I purchased a 1605 from eBay for my home lab. I decided to play with it a bit on my DSL circuit. I am using NAT on this router, and everything works fine except that now I can't vpn from the inside

Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]

2001-04-12 Thread Elijah Savage
All, I purchased a 1605 from eBay for my home lab. I decided to play with it a bit on my DSL circuit. I am using NAT on this router, and everything works fine except that now I can't vpn from the inside. Example, trying to establish a vpn connection from a client on my local network in to our vp