ure in the new IOSes.
>
> Ken Claussen MCSE CCNA CCA
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "The Mind is a Terrible thing to Waste!"
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Hire, Ejay
> Sent: Thursday, April 12,
: Thursday, April 12, 2001 1:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]
Is there any way to do NAT on a PIX or a Cisco router if you only have one
usable IP address? I perused CCO, and the most minimalistic NAT/PAT config
I can find still requires 2 (1 inte
lf Of
Charles Manafa
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
VPN does not work when IPSEC packets are NAT'd. One of the reasons why this
doesn't work is that packet authentication will fail when the packet is
NAT'd -
Check in your manual in the section on the 'global' command and read about
NAT vs PAT. I think you'll find your answer there.
- Original Message -
From: "Hire, Ejay"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321
Or NAT overload...brain fart..heh.
- Original Message -
From: "Hire, Ejay"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]
> Is there any way to do NAT on a PIX or a Cisco router if you only have one
> usable IP address
]
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]
Is there any way to do NAT on a PIX or a Cisco router if you only have
one
usable IP address? I perused CCO, and the most minimalistic NAT/PAT
config
I can find still requires 2 (1 interface, one global) addresses. The
Linksys/Netgear jobbies do it
(216.142.0.1 255.255.255.252) - (216.142.0.2
255.255.255.252) Router - Internal network.
-Original Message-
From: Elijah Savage [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]
Yeah his comment makes
At 11:45 AM 4/12/01 -0400, Charles Manafa wrote:
>I believe the issue here is a VPN client initiating an IPSEC tunnel behind a
>NAT device. This configuration does not work.
>
>A Cisco router or PIX can do a NAT then establish IPSEC tunnel with a remote
>end point. Once the tunnel is created, the
o make sure all outbound
ports are opened up correctly on the router.
Not the prettiest solution but it just might work ;)
Allen
- Original Message -
From: "Curtis Call"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 10:46 AM
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on DSL [7:321]
> If the DS
ginal Message -
From: "Circusnuts"
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:07 AM
Subject: Re: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
> Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ???
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Charles Manafa
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, Apr
assing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
>
>Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ???
>
>- Original Message -
>From: Charles Manafa
>To:
>Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:37 AM
>Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
>
>
> > VPN does not
use the tunnel to connect to the private network. This
configuration works.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: Circusnuts
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/04/01 14:07
Subject: Re: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ???
- Original Message
ge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 7:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
All,
I purchased a 1605 from eBay for my home lab. I decided to play with it
a bit on my DSL circuit. I am using NAT on this router, and everything
works f
]
Subject: Re: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ???
- Original Message -
From: Charles Manafa
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:37 AM
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
> VPN does not work when IPSEC packets are NA
Are you sure- my PIX 506 does it with no problem ???
- Original Message -
From: Charles Manafa
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001 8:37 AM
Subject: RE: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
> VPN does not work when IPSEC packets are NAT'd. One of the reasons why
this
> does
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12/04/01 12:11
Subject: Passing IPSEC packets on dsl [7:321]
All,
I purchased a 1605 from eBay for my home lab. I decided to play with it
a bit on my DSL circuit. I am using NAT on this router, and everything
works fine except that now I can't vpn from the inside
All,
I purchased a 1605 from eBay for my home lab. I decided to play with it
a bit on my DSL circuit. I am using NAT on this router, and everything
works fine except that now I can't vpn from the inside. Example, trying
to establish a vpn connection from a client on my local network in to
our vp
17 matches
Mail list logo