uot;Donald B Johnson jr"
>Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 1:15 PM
>Subject: RE: [7:11709]
>
>
>> that one is riddled with technicalities. all routing protocols use
network
>> layer packets to carry their information. personally, I believe they are
>> distinct in tha
rrieu"
To: "Donald B Johnson jr"
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: [7:11709]
> that one is riddled with technicalities. all routing protocols use network
> layer packets to carry their information. personally, I believe they are
> distinct in that ro
Have you ever used a list to block 520 udp applied say, inbound, on an
interface and see if RIP will populate that table.
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To: "Donald B Johnson jr"
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 1:15 PM
Subject: RE: [7:11709]
> t
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Larrieu"
To: "Donald B Johnson jr" ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 4:39 PM
Subject: RE: [7:11709]
> Missed the beginning of this thread, but from what I have seen it walks
the
> edge of something central to what we all do or hope t
t handed way of understanding the
>difference between routed and routing protocols.
>
>Chuck
>
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>Donald B Johnson jr
>Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:57 AM
>To: [EMAIL PRO
ECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Donald B Johnson jr
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 11:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [7:11709]
Actually it is a yes or no question.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Dixon"
To: "Donald B Johnson jr"
Sent: Tuesday, July
>
>A routing protocol is a protocol like
>eigrp, igrp, is-is,ospf, etc. A routed protocol is like ipx/spx, tcp/ip,
>vines, decnet, etc. A routed protocol must have a layer 3 address so
>netbios or cdp cannot be routed by themselves.
A routed protocol is the payload that is forwarded by routers,
Not all routing protocols are associated with layer 3 of the OSI model...
-Michael
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hire, Ejay
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:41 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [7:11709]
No. CDP is a Layer two
Actually it is a yes or no question.
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Dixon"
To: "Donald B Johnson jr"
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: [7:11709]
> cdp is a broadast and a proprietary protocol used by Cisco devices to
> discover other C
yes
I can?
- Original Message -
From: "Lowell Sharrah"
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 10:02 AM
Subject: Re: [7:11709]
hey can i use rip to route discontiguous subnets?? How about that?
>>> "Donald B Johnson jr" 07/10/01 10:28AM >>
: Re: [7:11709]
Can you use rip to route cdp. Why?
- Original Message -
From: "Lowell Sharrah"
To: ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [7:11709]
this is a common misconception. A routing protocol is a protocol like
eigrp, igrp, is-is,ospf, etc. A routed p
ou use rip to route cdp. Why?
- Original Message -
From: "Lowell Sharrah"
To: ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [7:11709]
this is a common misconception. A routing protocol is a protocol like
eigrp, igrp, is-is,ospf, etc. A routed protocol is like ipx/spx, tcp/ip,
Are you having a laugh...
> -Original Message-
> From: Donald B Johnson jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 10 July 2001 15:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [7:11709]
>
>
> Can you use rip to route cdp. Why?
>
>
>
> - Original M
Can you use rip to route cdp. Why?
- Original Message -
From: "Lowell Sharrah"
To: ;
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [7:11709]
this is a common misconception. A routing protocol is a protocol like
eigrp, igrp, is-is,ospf, etc. A routed protocol is li
this is a common misconception. A routing protocol is a protocol like
eigrp, igrp, is-is,ospf, etc. A routed protocol is like ipx/spx, tcp/ip,
vines, decnet, etc. A routed protocol must have a layer 3 address so
netbios or cdp cannot be routed by themselves.
>>> "Donald B Johnson jr" 07/10/01
Couple issues there wilson.
First the csu-dsu issue, someone is spoofing my e-mail address check the
header it says SR not JR.
Second my response was to mohamed not parky, I thought his definition was a
little off. Also I thought the response should have made the person
(Mohamed) think, not just r
16 matches
Mail list logo
