I would think that you would have to use the 828 G.SHDSL Router, not an 837
ADSL, as an ADSL connection requires an DSLAM to connect to, but the G.SHDSL
is for point to point
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63712&t=63711
---
Ismail,
It does not look possible. Where are you getting the signalling, timing and
IP addresses from?
If you can build it on your test bench with just a pair of wires, best of
luck.
Steve Wilson
Network Engineer
-Original Message-
From: Ismail Al-Shelh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 25
I think I have to refine my question to be clearer
Again
I want to connect my branch office with my head office (1.5Km) away via DSL
without any external service provider (phone company).
Two dry copper wires are laid physically from the Head Office to the Branch
office.
Is this design going
What you want to do is possibleinfact I demo'd something similar. I
used the MXL-2300 from tut systems ...
http://www.tutsys.com/mtu/products/ethernetworking/mxl_2300/index.cfm
at anything under 3.5km you can get about 2MB. I haven't tried it this
using any cisco kit,
Ismail Al-Shelh wrot
for MXL-2300.
Thanks for help.
Ismail Al-Shelh
-Original Message-
From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
What you want to do is possibleinfact I
>
>
> Thanks for help.
>
>
> Ismail Al-Shelh
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Troy Leliard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 7:31 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
>
> Wh
between the units.
Ismail Al-Shelh
Thanks for to Troy, Skarphedinsson, Steve Wilson and all.
-Original Message-
From: Ismail Al-Shelh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:52 AM
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
I have read the MXL
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
As Skarphedinsson told me before about the G.SHDSL 828, he was completely
right.
Cisco 828 and SOHO 78 G.SHDSL ro
rface.
Albert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
As Skarphedinsson told me before about the G.SHDSL 828, he was completely
nd all.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Ismail Al-Shelh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 8:52 AM
> Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch
> [7:63711]
>
> I have read the MXL-2300 Brochure its really not complicated
&
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 9:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ADSL Between Head Office and Remote Branch [7:63711]
NON Cisco, but hey .. tutsytems have a MTU pop (Multi Tenant User),
basically its not multipo
11 matches
Mail list logo
