Hi Priscilla,
GARP is also used as an abbreviation for Gratuitous Address Resolution
Protocol. This may also be used as a Layer 2 attack to mislead the
advertisement of the real IP address by some hackers.
Aziz S. Islam
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Priscilla,
>
> To decide on whether ISIS and MPLS are relevant to enterprises, I
> believe you have to look more deeply into the enterprise's structure
> and internal competencies. There are a substantial numb
Priscilla,
To decide on whether ISIS and MPLS are relevant to enterprises, I
believe you have to look more deeply into the enterprise's structure
and internal competencies. There are a substantial number of Fortune
100 companies, universities, etc., that consciously organize an
"internal ISP"
ecember 04, 2002 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: Enterprise technologies [7:58493]
> Thanks so much dre!
>
> Regarding GARP, someone said I had to cover it, but didn't explain why or
> even what it is. It seems to mean more than one thing:
>
> Generic Attribute Registration Protocol
""dre"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""nrf"" wrote in message..
> >
> > What ATM did was simple. It gave customers a circuit that was
> > almost good as leased while still providing for multiplexing, and
> > the cost-savings associated with that, to the provide
""nrf"" wrote in message..
>
> What ATM did was simple. It gave customers a circuit that was
> almost good as leased while still providing for multiplexing, and
> the cost-savings associated with that, to the provider. In short,
> providers could now provide leased lines without actually having
""dre"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""nrf"" wrote in message..
> > ISIS has more tuning parameters and more extensibility than OSPF.
> > It also has significantly more scalability than OSPF. I dislike
> > EIGRP precisely because it's inner-workings are closed.
I'd focus on Avvid technologies, centraly managed security and storage
solutions across nation-wide networks and public Internet (Cisco Works/ACS),
and on-line collaboration tools using open standards like LDAP, X.509,
h.323/SIP, etc.
That is where Enterprises are moving.
""Priscilla Oppenheimer
""nrf"" wrote in message..
> ISIS has more tuning parameters and more extensibility than OSPF.
> It also has significantly more scalability than OSPF. I dislike
> EIGRP precisely because it's inner-workings are closed.
If Cisco opened up EIGRP and you understood it completely, would
you be more
""dre"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote
> > I may be starting a new project doing some writing about
> > technologies used in enterprise networks. (read not service
> > provider)
> >
> > Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs
Priscilla Oppenheimer sagte:
> I may be starting a new project doing some writing about technologies
> used in enterprise networks. (read not service provider)
I know of someone, who could use it!
> Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs that use this?
We're using it here.
> How about M
Thanks so much dre!
Regarding GARP, someone said I had to cover it, but didn't explain why or
even what it is. It seems to mean more than one thing:
Generic Attribute Registration Protocol
and
Group Address Resolution Protocol
I'm assuming they meant the second one and that the second GARP is
""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote
> I may be starting a new project doing some writing about
> technologies used in enterprise networks. (read not service
> provider)
>
> Do I need to cover IS-IS? Or is it mainly ISPs that use this?
I've never seen IS-IS in Enterprise networks, only ISP
backbones a
13 matches
Mail list logo
