Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread John Neiberger
What do you mean, specifically? Does the line protocol never come up? Does the line protocol come up yet OSPF adjacencies do not form? Does the physical interface even come up? Thanks, John Bob Timmons 1/17/02 9:22:54 AM We're switching our routers from 3Com to Cisco and we're having

Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Timmons
On S5/1 I get UP/UP. On S5/1.4, I get UP/UP on our side and UP/UP on the remote side. On S5/1.3 I get Down/Down on our side and Up/Down on their side. What do you mean, specifically? Does the line protocol never come up? Does the line protocol come up yet OSPF adjacencies do not form? Does

RE: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Vincent Miller
Is the last site by any chance through an NNI link ? Have your tried frame-relay lmi-type ansi at both ends ? Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=32326t=32307 -- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:

Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread John Neiberger
Are you positive you have the DLCI assignments the same as in the 3COM router you replaced? What do 'show frame map' and 'show frame pvc' look like? Do you have any PVCs that are UNUSED/INACTIVE? On the remote side that is UP/DOWN, do you see any incoming packets at all or does it think the

Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Terry Vore
Bob,, You need to verify the LMI on the Canadian end...Cisco uses Strata (surprise) and Bell Canada uses Ansi or Annex A or Ddepends on where you are...I use to manage a network with several sites in the northland and we ran into this consistently. You can have different types of LMI in

Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Timmons
Thanks everyone for all the input... We're doing another test today at 4pm (EST) so I'll get more info and I'll try using different lmi-types. I seem to remember trying ansi, but I'll give it another go and I'll document all of the show frame map/pvc/etc in case it doesn't work again. Am I

Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread John Neiberger
Yes, the LMI is set at the interface level. However, since you're using 12.0 the router should auto-detect the LMI type. John Bob Timmons 1/17/02 12:59:25 PM Thanks everyone for all the input... We're doing another test today at 4pm (EST) so I'll get more info and I'll try using different

Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Terry Vore
Well, the sub-interfaces do not need the LMI, it is only used to report the information about the dlci's to the interfaceactually I have turned off the keepalives in a lab environment and still pass traffic to a frame switch.keepalives =LMI for CiscoThe other thing is to be sure of the

Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/2002 06:59 am Please respond to Bob Timmons To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307] Thanks everyone for all the input... We're doing another test today at 4pm (EST) so I'll get more info and I'll try using

Re: Frame-Relay problem - 3Com to Cisco (long) [7:32307]

2002-01-17 Thread Bob Timmons
Ok, success! Well, it turns out, we had a bad CSU. Strange thing, though. It worked ok on the 3Com equipment and last time we did testing, we put the CSU on the Cisco and it didn't work. We put it back on the 3Com and it worked fine. This time, we couldn't get it to work on the Cisco, tried