Bruce Enders wrote:
What kind of output do you get after the write mem or copy run
start
Wasn't Cisco supposed to depricate write mem? I never learned those forms
of the commands because when I first started learning Cisco eight years ago,
Cisco said not to bother learning them because they
I feel your pain! I am sitting here looking at a correct configuration
that is not working. Cisco TAC seems befuddled as I am.
Why is hte PIX so erractic? This sometimes work, sometimes not is driving
me bonkers!
Whatever you do, do NOT use 6.3 unless there is a specific feature or bug
fix
Priscilla,
The only reason I remember the old syntax is because I am basically lazy
when it comes to typing!
(I am also not very good at it). :-(
So, if I can type wr instead of copy run start I will! ;-)
In truth, all of the old write x syntax was supposed to wind up in the
undocumented
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
Bruce Enders wrote:
What kind of output do you get after the write mem or copy run
start
Wasn't Cisco supposed to depricate write mem? I never learned those forms
of the commands because when I first started learning Cisco eight years
ago,
Cisco said not to
I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That
seemed to cause an issue once with someone I was helping over the phone. I
wasn't aware that show config wasn't the same as show run and he had an
issue similar to the original post in this thread. He kept making changes
John Neiberger wrote:
I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That
Yup. 'sh conf' is 'show start', and 'show run' used to be 'write terminal'.
Regards,
Marco.
Message Posted at:
Mea cupa, you are correct John!!
Time to get outta here, I'm thirsty ;)
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That
seemed to cause an issue once with someone I was helping over the phone. I
wasn't aware that show config wasn't
Mea cupa, you are correct John!!
Time to get outta here, I'm thirsty ;)
Dave
John Neiberger wrote:
I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That
seemed to cause an issue once with someone I was helping over the phone. I
wasn't aware that show config wasn't
John Neiberger wrote:
I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That
Yup. 'sh conf' is 'show start', and 'show run' used to be 'write terminal'.
Regards,
Marco.
Message Posted at:
I feel your pain! I am sitting here looking at a correct configuration
that is not working. Cisco TAC seems befuddled as I am.
Why is hte PIX so erractic? This sometimes work, sometimes not is driving
me bonkers!
Whatever you do, do NOT use 6.3 unless there is a specific feature or bug
fix
.
Dwayne Saunders
CCNP CCS1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Charles Riley
Sent: Saturday, 31 May 2003 13:23
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]
I feel your pain! I am sitting here looking
11 matches
Mail list logo