Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Bruce Enders wrote: What kind of output do you get after the write mem or copy run start Wasn't Cisco supposed to depricate write mem? I never learned those forms of the commands because when I first started learning Cisco eight years ago, Cisco said not to bother learning them because they

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread Charles EEEE Riley
I feel your pain! I am sitting here looking at a correct configuration that is not working. Cisco TAC seems befuddled as I am. Why is hte PIX so erractic? This sometimes work, sometimes not is driving me bonkers! Whatever you do, do NOT use 6.3 unless there is a specific feature or bug fix

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850] OT funny rants [7:69900]

2003-05-31 Thread Bruce Enders
Priscilla, The only reason I remember the old syntax is because I am basically lazy when it comes to typing! (I am also not very good at it). :-( So, if I can type wr instead of copy run start I will! ;-) In truth, all of the old write x syntax was supposed to wind up in the undocumented

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread MADMAN
Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote: Bruce Enders wrote: What kind of output do you get after the write mem or copy run start Wasn't Cisco supposed to depricate write mem? I never learned those forms of the commands because when I first started learning Cisco eight years ago, Cisco said not to

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread John Neiberger
I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That seemed to cause an issue once with someone I was helping over the phone. I wasn't aware that show config wasn't the same as show run and he had an issue similar to the original post in this thread. He kept making changes

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
John Neiberger wrote: I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That Yup. 'sh conf' is 'show start', and 'show run' used to be 'write terminal'. Regards, Marco. Message Posted at:

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread MADMAN
Mea cupa, you are correct John!! Time to get outta here, I'm thirsty ;) Dave John Neiberger wrote: I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That seemed to cause an issue once with someone I was helping over the phone. I wasn't aware that show config wasn't

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread MADMAN
Mea cupa, you are correct John!! Time to get outta here, I'm thirsty ;) Dave John Neiberger wrote: I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That seemed to cause an issue once with someone I was helping over the phone. I wasn't aware that show config wasn't

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread M.C. van den Bovenkamp
John Neiberger wrote: I thought show conf was the equivalent of show start, not show run? That Yup. 'sh conf' is 'show start', and 'show run' used to be 'write terminal'. Regards, Marco. Message Posted at:

Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread Charles EEEE Riley
I feel your pain! I am sitting here looking at a correct configuration that is not working. Cisco TAC seems befuddled as I am. Why is hte PIX so erractic? This sometimes work, sometimes not is driving me bonkers! Whatever you do, do NOT use 6.3 unless there is a specific feature or bug fix

RE: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850]

2003-05-31 Thread Dwayne Saunders
. Dwayne Saunders CCNP CCS1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Charles Riley Sent: Saturday, 31 May 2003 13:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Loosing router config (OT rants) [7:69850] I feel your pain! I am sitting here looking