May I suggest a quick and dirty lab to test the various theories that have
been described in this thread.
1) Take a router, create four loopbacks with /32 masks out of the same /29
range.
2) set up your NAT pool with only two outside addresses. Then set the
outside interface. Maybe shorten the ti
This is what I have run into in the past and I was almost certain that it
was not possible. I set it up in the lab here with various configs and had
the same result.
As far as I was told in the last routing update I attended at our local
cisco office, the SE's there confirmed that the PIX can be d
I've found that you cannot do this, at least not when you do nat to a pool
of addresses. You have to do static nat, then overload the rest. I tried
adding overload to the end of my existing nat statment with the pool, it
started PATing the addresses from the beginning. Instead of using the 1:1
f
I knew this was possible on the pix, but have never configured it on an IOS
router. It would be really appreciated if someone wouldn't mind posting a
sample config as I cannot locate one on cisco's site or the netpro forum
specific to IOS routers with both NAT and PAT configured like outlined in
t
Thanks Symon,
We really want to know more about the way the overload
works...
Maybe we were not so exactly as we wanted... We want
to know how can we use PAT when any others publics ips
are exhausted after using NAT?
For example, if we configure this:
ip nat inside source list pool
overload
H
Yes you can just take your nat statement (ip nat inside source list 1...)
and add the word overload on the end of the command.
You will use a 1:1 NAT for the first set of users. Once your IP's are used
up you will use PAT. It is important to note that some issues arise with PAT
versus NAT like IPS
Yes, this is a typical setup.
Search cisco.com and you will find a sample config.
Symon
-Original Message-
From: ciscoGo2002 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 April 2003 11:58
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAT AFTER NAT...IS IT POSSIBLE??? [7:66672]
Hello folks,
I have question for
The combination of both can be done without any issues. I would keep 1 IP
from the assigned range for the PAT address and have the others as 1 - 1
translations.
Andrew
CCNP, CCDP, CSS1
-Original Message-
From: ciscoGo2002 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 02 April 2003 12:58
To: [EMAIL PROT
Yes it can be done, you just need to redefine you pool, for 1-1 nat, use all
but 1 of your available IP's, then do another nat with overload on the last
ip address.
=?iso-8859-1?q?ciscoGo2002?= wrote:
>
> Hello folks,
> I have question for you, we want to do dynamic NAT
> with a pool of 128 publi
Of course you can, but why not doing just PAT ?
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=66674&t=66672
--
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosur
10 matches
Mail list logo
