Re: PIX failover problem [7:56199]

2002-10-29 Thread Nadeem-ur-Rehman
and check if the primary is > active and after the rebooted pix comesup ? What is OS version of your PIX ? > > Vamsi > - Original Message - > From: "mike Dang" > To: > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:02 PM > Subject: Re: PIX failover problem [7:56199] &

Re: PIX failover problem [7:56199]

2002-10-25 Thread Vamsi Krishna
Hi Mike, Have you tried rebooting the Secondary PIX and check if the primary is active and after the rebooted pix comesup ? What is OS version of your PIX ? Vamsi - Original Message - From: "mike Dang" To: Sent: Friday, October 25, 2002 1:02 PM Subject: Re: PIX failover

Re: PIX failover problem [7:56199]

2002-10-25 Thread mike Dang
ting PIX in failover configuration ? through cross over cable or through a separate switch ? Pls reply. Regards, Vamsi - Original Message - From: "Patrick Donlon" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: Re: PIX failover problem [7:56199] > I think you've go

Re: PIX failover problem [7:56199]

2002-10-24 Thread Patrick Donlon
I think you've got your config correct, when any of the interfaces go down on the active PIX it will switch into standby. So when you reboot the standby it will cause this to happen, the documentation does say you should use a separate switch for the failover NICs which should prevent this, http://

Re: PIX failover problem [7:56199]

2002-10-24 Thread Vamsi Krishna
normal practice of connecting PIX in failover configuration ? through cross over cable or through a separate switch ? Pls reply. Regards, Vamsi - Original Message - From: "Patrick Donlon" To: Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 4:11 PM Subject: Re: PIX failover problem [7:56

Re: PIX Failover [7:51491]

2002-08-16 Thread matt
yes, it will sync automatically, or you can force it with "write standby" HTH, ms --- "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > Speaking of stateful PIX's, if I make a change on 1 > PIX, and it has failover > on, will it automatically make a change on the other > PIX? > > > ""Gaz"" wrote in message > [EMAI

Re: PIX Failover [7:51491]

2002-08-16 Thread Henry D.
Whenever you type a command on the active unit it's being replicated to the standby unit. So yes, it will automatically update standby unit but it's not written to memory unless you write to memory on the active first. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: PIX Failover [7:51491]

2002-08-16 Thread Steven A. Ridder
Speaking of stateful PIX's, if I make a change on 1 PIX, and it has failover on, will it automatically make a change on the other PIX? ""Gaz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] > says... > > Hi, > > > > In a Stataful configuration, an

Re: PIX Failover [7:51491]

2002-08-16 Thread Gaz
In article , [EMAIL PROTECTED] says... > Hi, > > In a Stataful configuration, and two PIX are interconnected via a > dedicated Failover Fastethernet, in case of the Active unit's Internal > interface fails, is there any method to shift traffic to the Standby > unit's Internal interface to mainta

Re: PIX Failover [7:51491]

2002-08-15 Thread Simer Mayo
In a stateful config, this is done by the standby PIX. It sends hello packets and runs the interface tests to the active pix and when it doesn't recieves any response it takes the role of the active pix. TCP and UDP connections will be maintained but not the IPSec and ICMP. - Original Messag

Re: PIX failover!! [7:15848]

2001-09-01 Thread Jonathan Hays
And keep in mind this Primary/Secondary business is completely separate from which firewall is Active and which is Standby. The Active/Standby question is the more important one. MikeN wrote: > I believe that the serial numbers will be registered as to whether it is UR > or a failover. Both will

Re: PIX Failover cable [7:18001]

2001-08-30 Thread Jonathan Hays
I believe it's part number PIX-FO= or you could buy it as LD-FO= since it is the same cable for the LocalDirector. Mark Smith wrote: > Does anyone have the part number for the failover cable for a 515 PIX. Mine > went MIA during a company move. I can't find on Cisco's or any vendor's site > wher

Re: PIX failover!! [7:15848]

2001-08-13 Thread MikeN
I believe that the serial numbers will be registered as to whether it is UR or a failover. Both will work as stand-alone firewalls. Yes, the failover cable will determine which will be primary and which will be secondary. Once they are configured: show failover will show you which PIX is primary a

Re: PIX failover!! [7:15848]

2001-08-13 Thread Jan Huizinga
Hi, It is the cable only that selects the primary or secondary (it is even written on the cable). You make the configuration on the primary, and this will be sigronized with the secondary. Hope this helps, bye, ""Magdy H. Ibrahim"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]..

RE: PIX failover redundancy

2001-01-09 Thread Christopher Larson
Statefull failover can be doen if any interface on the PIX goes down. Each interface needs to be able to talk to the other interface on the second pix. So the inside on the primary has to be able to communicate with the inside on the secondary, DMZ to DMZ etc. and for statefull fail there has to b

Re: PIX failover

2001-01-02 Thread ItsMe
PIX 520's don't have a R or UR version they all support failover. ""Florin Mechetiuc"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 92svsr$482$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:92svsr$482$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I have couple of 520 firewalls ordered a while back but I don't know if is a > way to check > if they ar

RE: PIX failover

2001-01-02 Thread Jim Dixon
7;; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: PIX failover If you do sh ver from enable mode you get :- PIX_TH_BB# sh ver PIX Version 4.4(4) Compiled on Thu 06-Jan-00 16:07 by pixbuild PIX BIOS (4.0) #0: Tue May 18 16:29:54 PDT 1999 PIX_TH_BB up 104 days 21 hours Hardware: PIX-515, 64 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 200

RE: PIX failover

2001-01-02 Thread Andrew Twigger
If you do sh ver from enable mode you get :- PIX_TH_BB# sh ver PIX Version 4.4(4) Compiled on Thu 06-Jan-00 16:07 by pixbuild PIX BIOS (4.0) #0: Tue May 18 16:29:54 PDT 1999 PIX_TH_BB up 104 days 21 hours Hardware: PIX-515, 64 MB RAM, CPU Pentium 200 MHz Flash strata @ base 0x300 0: ethernet

RE: Pix Failover Question

2000-09-16 Thread Dave Swink
Brad, If the DMZ interface is not being used at the moment you need to connect any unused interfaces to the same unused interfaces on the standby PIX with a crossover cable. Dave Swink > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > BE > Sent: Fri

Re: Pix Failover Question

2000-09-16 Thread Rodgers Moore
A co-worker has seen this and it is a bug. He didn't remember the version number(s) affected. Rodgers Moore ""BE"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message 8ptc7v$7a1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:8ptc7v$7a1$[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Rodgers, > > Hi! Thanks for your response. > > The answer is YES to all o

Re: Pix Failover Question

2000-09-15 Thread BE
Rodgers, Hi! Thanks for your response. The answer is YES to all of your questions. The really strange thing is, when I leave the single PIX 510 running for an extended period of time, it works great, no problems. When I add the second PIX, it just seems to grab the DMZ connection (but leaves

Re: Pix Failover Question

2000-09-15 Thread Rodgers Moore
It sounds like they're both identical. That's good. Do you have ALL the interfaces in an UP state? and each pair of interfaces are on the same hub? A down interface will be considered a failure Both configs are identical? You power cycled both boxes at the same time? Rodgers Moore ""BE""