On Apr 10, 6:23am, trammer wrote:
I meant to respond to this awhile ago...
} If you feel that the firewall aspect of your network does not require the
} horsepower, functionality, failover, expansion, etc. of a dedicated purpose
} box such as the PIX, then a regular router (2600, 3600,
: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
-Message d'origine-
De : Andrew Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyi : dimanche 18 novembre 2001 00:09
@ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
Hi all.
What are some of the reasons why a person would choose a PIX solution
rather
-Message d'origine-
De : Andrew Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyi : dimanche 18 novembre 2001 00:09
@ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
Hi all.
What are some of the reasons why a person would choose a PIX solution
rather than a good router with the the
]]On Behalf Of
Mcfadden, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
1. (Probably the only real reason) Off load processor overhead by having
packet filtering happen somewhere other than the device that is trying to
also perform routing
]] On Behalf Of
Mcfadden, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
1. (Probably the only real reason) Off load processor overhead by having
packet filtering happen somewhere other than the device that is trying
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Mcfadden, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
1. (Probably the only real reason) Off load processor overhead by having
packet filtering happen somewhere other than
, 2001 2:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
1. (Probably the only real reason) Off load processor overhead by having
packet filtering happen somewhere other than the device that is trying to
also perform routing tasks.
2. DMZ? (Can be handled via router, though
One last thing...for the life of me, I can't find what PIX stands for!
Any help appreciated! Thanks in advance.
Private Internet eXchange
- Original Message -
From: BASSOLE Rock
To:
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 8:01 AM
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607
Private Internet Exchange..
-Original Message-
From: Mcfadden, Chuck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 29 November 2001 9:03 a.m.
To:
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
1. (Probably the only real reason) Off load processor overhead by having
packet filtering happen
]
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX?
[7:26607]
Sent
by:
nobody@groups
tudy.com
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Mcfadden, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:03 PM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
1. (Probably the only real reason) Off load processor overhead by having
packet filtering happen
/cisco/200106/msg02089.html
-Kent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Justin Lofton
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 12:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
Stateful firewalling and cut through proxy which
There are many reasons why one would use pixfirst off, in the enterprise
arena, yuo never want to overload any of your routers if you can keep away
from it. Also consider the amount of interfaces a pix can hold vice a 26xx
or 25xxeven a 36xx Not to mention that pix supports gig for
]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
-Message d'origine-
De : Andrew Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyi : dimanche 18 novembre 2001 00:09
@ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
Hi all
The acronym PIX is derived from Private Internet Exchange.
Pat
-Original Message-
From: Ole Drews Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
PIX comes from the word canine, which
I guess just to look at it from a high level or simple view is to evaluate
your network and business needs when it comes to the firewall topic and
evaluate the importance of the firewall in both your network needs and as a
business need.
If you feel that the firewall aspect of your network does
nrf wrote
But in general, it is true that over time, more and more features will be
incorporated by Cisco into IOS, such that it may not prove necessary to buy
those ancillary appliances that Cisco sells and just get a pumped up IOS
router that does everything. It may not do things as well as
Packet Internet eXchanger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 6:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The Scoop on PIX? [7:26607]
Hi all.
What are some of the reasons why a person would choose a PIX solution
rather
Actually it's Private Internet Exchange
Christopher Supino wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Packet Internet eXchanger
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2001 6:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, I don't have the technical specs in front of me right now. But in
general, when you take a given PIX and compare it to a router that costs an
equivalent amount of money (including license for FW feature set), the PIX
does firewall processing faster. It also has more security features -
At 06:08 PM 11/17/01 -0500, Andrew Michael wrote:
Hi all.
What are some of the reasons why a person would choose a PIX solution
rather than a good router with the the right IOS for security?
The Pix is a stateful firewall, Cisco routers (as far as I know, typically)
are not. Generally
21 matches
Mail list logo
