Router
2600 b Connecting WAN and Voice Interface Cards to a Network
Martijn
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Ryan Finnesey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 13 augustus 2003 7:53
Aan: Jansen, M; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
That is a ADSL
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
Despite all hw issues, you really need to
- describe the business req's first
- translate to technical req's
(you are talking 2000+ sites)
And you will see that you'll need more than
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: woensdag 13 augustus 2003 3:57
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
You are right it is a service offering. Right now, we are using ISDN
dial-up and would like to move to a full time connection. We would not be
using the customerbs
Despite all hw issues, you really need to
- describe the business req's first
- translate to technical req's
(you are talking 2000+ sites)
And you will see that you'll need more than one platform for de Remotes.
Dependig on your hierarchy concerning
- messaging
- authentication
-
, and should immediately delete it from your computer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] LITTLE OT:
Fred, I
Sent: Mon 8/11/2003 10:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
I would certainly hope that the remotes wouldn't use different platforms.
I
don't know the business model, but it sounds to me like it's some kind of
service
, M; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
I would certainly hope that the remotes wouldn't use different platforms. I
don't know the business model, but it sounds to me like it's some kind of
service offering or something. Maybe they have a 2000 site Frame Relay
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
You mean? newest:
DSL WAN Interface Cards
WIC-1ADSL-I-DG 1-port ADSLoISDN WAN Interface Card
cco partner login:
http
, 2003 10:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793]
Hi Ryan,
For head-end 3030/3060 would be a better choice. PIX for example doesn't
provide connectivity between remote sites in hub-and-spoke topology.
On remote side 831 might be a best pick especially if you
At 4:57 PM + 8/11/03, Truman, Michelle, RTSLS wrote:
Advantis is actually now called AGNS for ATT Global Network (Was the
IBM Global Network after it was Advantis).
I still cherish memories of teaching a class to Advantis when it was
still an IBM-Sears joint venture. It was a private ICRC,
Hi Ryan,
For head-end 3030/3060 would be a better choice. PIX for example doesn't
provide connectivity between remote sites in hub-and-spoke topology.
On remote side 831 might be a best pick especially if you want to provide
some backup mechanism for VPN tunnel.
Regards,
Andrey.
Message Posted
Groan. I'll bet they could really make the chIPs fly.
-Original Message-
From: Howard C. Berkowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They finally identified the superior router brand.
Craftsman.
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7i=73895t=73793
I'd consider the 3005 at the remote sites. It has the capability to do a
LAN-to-LAN NAT, where if you had customer A and customer B that both used
10.1.x you could map them to 45.1 and 45.2 respectively, or any other
equal-mask network.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford
: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] LITTLE OT: [7:73793]
Wow, I guess I'm dating myself a little there if that many changes have
happened. I don't believe there were that many options
I'd consider the 3005 at the remote sites. It has the capability to do a
LAN-to-LAN NAT, where if you had customer A and customer B that both used
10.1.x you could map them to 45.1 and 45.2 respectively, or any other
equal-mask network.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Work: 651-998-0949
-Original Message-
From: Reimer, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] LITTLE OT: [7:73883]
Why thanks! I only have a CCNA now because I had
: Monday, August 11, 2003 12:57 PM
To: Reimer, Fred; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: VPN Best Hardware to use? [7:73793] LITTLE OT: [7:73883]
Advantis is actually now called AGNS for ATT Global Network (Was the
IBM Global Network after it was Advantis). You can get VPN's on just
about any remote client you
I'd consider the 3005 at the remote sites. It has the capability to do a
LAN-to-LAN NAT, where if you had customer A and customer B that both used
10.1.x you could map them to 45.1 and 45.2 respectively, or any other
equal-mask network.
Fred Reimer - CCNA
Eclipsys Corporation, 200 Ashford
18 matches
Mail list logo
