Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-22 Thread Kelly Scroggins
] Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain? -Original Message- From: John Kale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12

RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-15 Thread Chuck Larrieu
] Subject:RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] Each Vlan can accomadate 254 with each switch accomadating a max of 256 devices...its was on my Switching exam todayI passed ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Haller Sent

RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-15 Thread Robert Padjen
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of William E. Gragido Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:16 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] Each Vlan can accomadate 254 with each switch accomadating a max

RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-14 Thread Karen E Young
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain

RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-14 Thread Patrick Ramsey
break it into two or more VLANS and route between the VLANS, this help out in the performance arena. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum

RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-13 Thread William E. Gragido
] Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] If I remember correctly, each VLAN is it's own subnet. And therefore, if each vlan is it's own subnet, you can only have 254 devices attached to each subnet. You may wanna check that on CCO. --- John Kale wrote: hi all, I read somewhere

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-13 Thread Kevin Wigle
supports the often stated opinion on this list that many of the exams have errors. Kevin Wigle - Original Message - From: William E. Gragido To: Sent: Wednesday, 13 June, 2001 19:16 Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] Each Vlan can accomadate 254 with each switch

RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-13 Thread CCB
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Hire, Ejay Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain

RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Hire, Ejay
The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain? -Original Message- From: John Kale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Vlans - maximum no of devices

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Bryan In Richmond
I'm gonna take a wild stab at this but I believe 500 ethernet devices is Cisco reccomended amount per VLan. Take that number and confirm it please. Bryan - Original Message - From: John Kale To: Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:45 AM Subject: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] hi

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Richard Deal
To all, In Cisco's BCMSN class, they make the comment of 254. I think that Cisco chose this number is because that most people use a /24 mask for subnetting. In BOTH of Cisco's design classes, this is the recommendation: * IP= 500 * IPX = 300 * AT = 200 * Mixed = 200 I think

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Bob S
That limitation sounds like the number of host in a class C address group. You know, 256 address minus the network address and the broadcast address. There is no limitation, but of courses common sense would tell you that the more workstation contending for the same resource would introduce

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Chris Haller
If I remember correctly, each VLAN is it's own subnet. And therefore, if each vlan is it's own subnet, you can only have 254 devices attached to each subnet. You may wanna check that on CCO. --- John Kale wrote: hi all, I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of 254 devices in

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Richard Deal
Chris Haller wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... If I remember correctly, each VLAN is it's own subnet. And therefore, if each vlan is it's own subnet, you can only have 254 devices attached to each subnet. Wrong! What about this? 172.16.2.0 255.255.254.0--this

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Kevin Wigle
Haller To: Sent: Tuesday, 12 June, 2001 19:45 Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] If I remember correctly, each VLAN is it's own subnet. And therefore, if each vlan is it's own subnet, you can only have 254 devices attached to each subnet. You may wanna check that on CCO

RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Dwayne Saunders
by it. *** -Original Message- From: Richard Deal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 09:28 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread Bob S
responder say this mask would have 512 address available minus network and broadcast address = 510 host addresses. From: Kevin Wigle Reply-To: Kevin Wigle To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:20:32 -0400 that may be true if your

Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]

2001-06-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
172.11.10.0 255.255.255.254.0 Just as previous responder say this mask would have 512 address available minus network and broadcast address = 510 host addresses. From: Kevin Wigle Reply-To: Kevin Wigle To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128] Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:20