Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread The Long and Winding Road
""garrett allen"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > i have a need for a high availability solution for a default gateway > configuration. just finished the ccdp and thought it might be > interesting to try hsrp on a pair of 2514's. put some of that theory > to work. instead of highly re

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
Um, he already has both the E0s in the same subnet and both the E1s in the same subnet, according to his config. His drawing is confusing but I think he's got PC1 and both E0s in subnet 10.3.0.0/16, say on a hub or a switch. He's got PC2 and both E1s in subnet 10.4.0.0, on another hub or switch.

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
rk, for example the rest of the enterprise network or the Internet, so it doesn't matter which one gets used. Priscilla > > > - Original Message ----- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:23 PM > Subject: Re:

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread garrett allen
e and the virtual address does move from interface e0 to interface e1. but i like your theory of no return path. thanks much. garrett - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer Date: Thursday, March 6, 2003 6:23 pm Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread garrett allen
router's actual burned in address as the mac. so i can see, well sort of see, how things could get messy. later all. - Original Message - From: Priscilla Oppenheimer Date: Thursday, March 6, 2003 7:51 pm Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638] > Larry L

RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread Daniel Cotts
s the other router to take over. > -Original Message- > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638] > > > Larry Letterma

RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
riscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... > [7:64638] > > > > > > Larry Letterman wrote: > > > > > > th

RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
What did you use a default gateway on the PCs?? Priscilla garrett allen wrote: > > i have a need for a high availability solution for a default > gateway > configuration. just finished the ccdp and thought it might be > interesting to try hsrp on a pair of 2514's. put some of that > theory >

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread Larry Letterman
started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638] Um, he already has both the E0s in the same subnet and both the E1s in the same subnet, according to his config. His drawing is confusing but I think he's got PC1 and both E0s in subnet 10.3.0.0/16, say on a hub or a switch. He'

RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-06 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
gt; > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:52 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... > > [7:64638] > > > > > > > > > La

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-07 Thread John Neiberger
That's an excellent point. With this design you run a risk of asymmetrical routing. To solve this, in the HSRP configuration on each router have the e0 interface track the e1 interface and vice-versa. That way, if you pull a cable on one side, this triggers failover on both sides. Give that a s

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-07 Thread garrett allen
as a really good idea ... [7:64638] > That's an excellent point. With this design you run a risk of > asymmetrical routing. To solve this, in the HSRP configuration on > eachrouter have the e0 interface track the e1 interface and vice- > versa. > That way, if you pull a cab

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-07 Thread Priscilla Oppenheimer
> to ping > with minimal interruption. > > cheers! > > > > - Original Message - > From: John Neiberger > Date: Friday, March 7, 2003 11:42 am > Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638] > > > That's an excellent poi

Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-07 Thread Scott Roberts
> > -Original Message- > > From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:52 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638] > > > > > > Larry Letterman w

Re: RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-07 Thread garrett allen
, 2003 5:14 pm Subject: RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638] > What did you use a default gateway on the PCs?? > > Priscilla > > garrett allen wrote: > > > > i have a need for a high availability solution for a default > > gateway >

Re: RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]

2003-03-07 Thread garrett allen
: Re: RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638] > must ... find... coffee > > just catching back up as dc awakens. the default gateways used by > the > pc's are the virtual router addresses, a different one for each > (i.e. > pc1 uses virtual rou