RE: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-09 Thread Michael Williams
Lemme take a stab at this one. I don't run OSPF where I work, but I'd like to keep my chops up to date =) In OSPF, you need to have an Area 0. If there are 2 routers only in your network, and only one area, it needs to be Area 0. If there is only 1 Area in your network, there is no need fo

RE: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-09 Thread Kris Keen
Its seeing the router as no direct link to the backbone (area 0) and such is assuming you have a virtual link configured. Change your areas to 0 and see what happens. Area 0, fundamental to OSPF. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48468&t=48463

RE: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-09 Thread Charles D Hammonds
friend ;) Charles -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Williams Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2002 9:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: OSPF problem [7:48463] Lemme take a stab at this one. I don't run OSPF where I work, bu

RE: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 10/07/2002 03:51 pm - "Michael Williams" Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/07/2002 02:36 pm Please respond to "Michael Williams" To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:RE: OSPF problem [7:48463] Is this par

Re: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-09 Thread Darren Ward
For a start it appears you do not have a common subnet on the link between the two devices so it'll complain about that. Make the Router A interface 10.1.1.1/255.255.255.252 and Router B 10.1.1.2/255.255.255.252 then add router ospf 1 network 10.1.1.0 0.0.0.3 area 0 Every OSPF network must hav

RE: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-10 Thread Peter van Oene
A quick note below. At 04:36 AM 7/10/2002 +, Michael Williams wrote: >Lemme take a stab at this one. I don't run OSPF where I work, but I'd >like to keep my chops up to date =) > >In OSPF, you need to have an Area 0. If there are 2 routers only in your >network, and only one area, it ne

Re: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-10 Thread Peter van Oene
Comment below, At 04:18 AM 7/10/2002 +, John Brandis wrote: >I have the following error whilst playing with OSPF > >12:52:40: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: mismatch area ID, from >backbone area must be virtual-link but not found from 10.1.4.20, Ethernet0 > >I have 2 routers, Router

RE: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-10 Thread Howard C. Berkowitz
At 5:50 AM + 7/10/02, Charles D Hammonds wrote: >It is always best practice to use area 0 if it is the only area. If you have >more than one area configured either one of them *must* be area 0 or there >must be a virtual link to area 0. See the following for your particular >error: > >http://w

Re: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-12 Thread thinkworker
I think it is ur misconfiguration on the interfaces. In fact, OSPF will not need a 'backbond' is there is only one area. On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:18:45 GMT "John Brandis" wrote: > I have the following error whilst playing with OSPF > > 12:52:40: %OSPF-4-ERRRCV: Received invalid packet: mismat

Re: OSPF problem [7:48463]

2002-07-14 Thread Shahid Muhammad Shafi
Try area 0. I think it will work. thinkworker wrote: I think it is ur misconfiguration on the interfaces. In fact, OSPF will not need a 'backbond' is there is only one area. On Wed, 10 Jul 2002 04:18:45 GMT "John Brandis" wrote: > I have the following error whilst playing with OSPF > > 12