: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
What did you use a default gateway on the PCs??
Priscilla
garrett allen wrote:
i have a need for a high availability solution for a default
gateway
configuration. just finished the ccdp and thought it might be
interesting to try hsrp
: Re: RE: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
must ... find... coffee
just catching back up as dc awakens. the default gateways used by
the
pc's are the virtual router addresses, a different one for each
(i.e.
pc1 uses virtual router 1 and pc2 uses virtual router 2
That's an excellent point. With this design you run a risk of
asymmetrical routing. To solve this, in the HSRP configuration on each
router have the e0 interface track the e1 interface and vice-versa.
That way, if you pull a cable on one side, this triggers failover on
both sides.
Give that a
as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
That's an excellent point. With this design you run a risk of
asymmetrical routing. To solve this, in the HSRP configuration on
eachrouter have the e0 interface track the e1 interface and vice-
versa.
That way, if you pull a cable on one side
interruption.
cheers!
- Original Message -
From: John Neiberger
Date: Friday, March 7, 2003 11:42 am
Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
That's an excellent point. With this design you run a risk of
asymmetrical routing. To solve
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
Larry Letterman wrote:
that was my answer as well...the broken connection will black
hole the path on
one side or the other
garrett allen wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
i have a need for a high availability solution for a default gateway
configuration. just finished the ccdp and thought it might be
interesting to try hsrp on a pair of 2514's. put some of that theory
to work. instead of highly resiliant
Um, he already has both the E0s in the same subnet and both the E1s in the
same subnet, according to his config.
His drawing is confusing but I think he's got PC1 and both E0s in subnet
10.3.0.0/16, say on a hub or a switch.
He's got PC2 and both E1s in subnet 10.4.0.0, on another hub or switch.
: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ...
[7:64638]
Um, he already has both the E0s in the same subnet and both
the E1s in the
same subnet, according to his config.
His drawing
interface e0 to interface e1. but i like your theory of no return
path.
thanks much.
garrett
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
Date: Thursday, March 6, 2003 6:23 pm
Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
Um, he already has both the E0s in the same
in address as the mac. so i can see, well sort
of see, how things could get messy.
later all.
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
Date: Thursday, March 6, 2003 7:51 pm
Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
Larry Letterman wrote:
that was my
the other router to take
over.
-Original Message-
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
Larry Letterman wrote:
that was my answer as well
, 2003 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ...
[7:64638]
Larry Letterman wrote:
that was my answer as well...the broken connection will
black
hole the path on
one side or the other...
Larry Letterman
Network Engineer
What did you use a default gateway on the PCs??
Priscilla
garrett allen wrote:
i have a need for a high availability solution for a default
gateway
configuration. just finished the ccdp and thought it might be
interesting to try hsrp on a pair of 2514's. put some of that
theory
to
: it started out as a really good idea ... [7:64638]
Um, he already has both the E0s in the same subnet and both the E1s in the
same subnet, according to his config.
His drawing is confusing but I think he's got PC1 and both E0s in subnet
10.3.0.0/16, say on a hub or a switch.
He's got PC2
- Original Message -
From: Priscilla Oppenheimer
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: it started out as a really good idea ...
[7:64638]
Um, he already has both the E0s in the same subnet and
both
the E1s
16 matches
Mail list logo
