Priscilla Oppenheimer wrote:
>
> Steiven Poh-\(Jaring MailBox\) wrote:
> >
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > This port is connected to my 2600 router, can anyone comment
> > whether the
> > bandwidth is healthy? Thanks
>
> Bandwidth just means capacity. It can't be healthy or not
> healthy, although the am
ansmit Queue Limit is
> reached, the packet is dropped. However, if 'transmit-buffers
> backing-store'
>
> is enabled, the packet is placed in a System Buffer (which
> has to be obtained
> from an appropriate Free-List), and enqueued in the Output
> Hold queue f
Steiven Poh-\(Jaring MailBox\) wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> This port is connected to my 2600 router, can anyone comment
> whether the
> bandwidth is healthy? Thanks
Bandwidth just means capacity. It can't be healthy or not healthy, although
the amount of bandwith could be inappropriate for the appl
be
obtained
from an appropriate Free-List), and enqueued in the Output Hold queue for
future transmission at the Process level, and an Output Buffer Swap is
reported.
From:Sam Sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thu 06/02/2003 3:59 PM
To: [E
No, too many errors. The are caused by the having the router set to half
duplex. On 2600 routers you can set the interfaces to full duplex. You
should do this on the router and on the switch for that port.
""Steiven Poh-(Jaring MailBox)"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Group,
This port is connected to my 2600 router, can anyone comment whether the
bandwidth is healthy? Thanks
FastEthernet0/48 is up, line protocol is up
Hardware is Fast Ethernet, address is 000a.f477.662c (bia 000a.f477.662c)
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1 Kbit, DLY 1000 usec,
reliability
6 matches
Mail list logo
