]
Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network
deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain?
-Original Message-
From: John Kale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12
]
Subject:RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
Each Vlan can accomadate 254 with each switch accomadating a max of 256
devices...its was on my Switching exam todayI passed ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Chris Haller
Sent
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
William E. Gragido
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
Each Vlan can accomadate 254 with each switch
accomadating a max
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hire, Ejay
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network
deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain
no of devices [7:8128]
The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network
deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain?
-Original Message-
From: John Kale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Vlans - maximum
]
Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
If I remember correctly, each VLAN is it's own subnet.
And therefore, if each vlan is it's own subnet, you
can only have 254 devices attached to each subnet.
You may wanna check that on CCO.
--- John Kale wrote:
hi all,
I read somewhere
supports the often
stated opinion on this list that many of the exams have errors.
Kevin Wigle
- Original Message -
From: William E. Gragido
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 13 June, 2001 19:16
Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
Each Vlan can accomadate 254 with each switch
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Hire, Ejay
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network
deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain
hi all,
I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of 254 devices in a vlan.
I'm currently redesigning a network that would have a vlan containing about
300 devices. Is the 254 restriction a design one? Please can someone
enlighting me on this issue.
regards,
Tunde
The theory behind it is this. Would you, in a preplanned network
deployment, put over 250 devices in the same Broadcast domain?
-Original Message-
From: John Kale [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Vlans - maximum no of devices
I'm gonna take a wild stab at this but I believe 500 ethernet devices is
Cisco reccomended amount per VLan. Take that number and confirm it please.
Bryan
- Original Message -
From: John Kale
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 5:45 AM
Subject: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
hi
To all,
In Cisco's BCMSN class, they make the comment of 254. I think that Cisco
chose this number is because that most people use a /24 mask for
subnetting. In BOTH of Cisco's design classes, this is the recommendation:
* IP= 500
* IPX = 300
* AT = 200
* Mixed = 200
I think
many
problems. But 300 is not too high.
From: John Kale
Reply-To: John Kale
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 05:45:24 -0400
hi all,
I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of 254 devices in a vlan.
I'm currently
If I remember correctly, each VLAN is it's own subnet.
And therefore, if each vlan is it's own subnet, you
can only have 254 devices attached to each subnet.
You may wanna check that on CCO.
--- John Kale wrote:
hi all,
I read somewhere that there can only be a maximum of
254 devices in
Chris Haller wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
If I remember correctly, each VLAN is it's own subnet.
And therefore, if each vlan is it's own subnet, you
can only have 254 devices attached to each subnet.
Wrong!
What about this? 172.16.2.0 255.255.254.0--this
Haller
To:
Sent: Tuesday, 12 June, 2001 19:45
Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
If I remember correctly, each VLAN is it's own subnet.
And therefore, if each vlan is it's own subnet, you
can only have 254 devices attached to each subnet.
You may wanna check that on CCO
by it.
***
-Original Message-
From: Richard Deal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 09:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7
responder say this mask would have 512 address available
minus network and broadcast address = 510 host addresses.
From: Kevin Wigle
Reply-To: Kevin Wigle
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 20:20:32 -0400
that may be true if your
: Vlans - maximum no of devices [7:8128]
Why not? you can assign an IP address on a logical interface and mask it
just like a physical interface.
You can have this:
interface vlan 12
ip address 172.11.10.0 255.255.254.0
or
interface fastethernet 1/0.1
encapsulation isl 12
ip address
19 matches
Mail list logo
